發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-18 16:14

  本文選題：從化地區(qū) + 傳統(tǒng)村落��； 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在當(dāng)今的世界背景中，全球化進(jìn)程與地域性文化保護(hù)的相互影響讓人們在對待傳統(tǒng)村落的態(tài)度方面再次進(jìn)行了反思。宏觀的來看不難發(fā)現(xiàn)在歷史上曾經(jīng)多次出現(xiàn)類似于全球化進(jìn)程與地域文化之間的問題，這無非就是文化領(lǐng)域中的又一次文化交融與同化的過程。歷史上，作為過去人們歷代生息勞作的場所，傳統(tǒng)村落承載了太多的地域文化和歷史價(jià)值。因此越來越多的人已然認(rèn)清了全球化的進(jìn)程并不是要取代傳統(tǒng)村落所承載的地域文化，而是要使其在不斷地與異域文化的交融中更新和發(fā)展。 如今在從化，許多傳統(tǒng)具有嶺南特色的村落保留了下來，它們?yōu)檠芯繋X南地域文化提供了不可或缺的寶貴資料，然而在傳統(tǒng)村落保護(hù)的具體操作過程中卻難免存在著偏差。一方面是對于嶺南特色村落所包含的元素本身即顯性的村落語匯的研究不夠完善，，這是由于對村落整體風(fēng)貌語匯存在片面的認(rèn)知，將目光只停留在了某些單一層面，并沒有完整地認(rèn)識到能夠反映傳統(tǒng)生活方式和民俗文化的村落所有元素；另一方面是對于村落文化價(jià)值的認(rèn)知存在偏差，在把握經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化之間的尺度時(shí)眼光不夠長遠(yuǎn)，如某些傳統(tǒng)村落完全成為了帶來經(jīng)濟(jì)利潤的文化商品，開發(fā)商只注重了經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值，卻沒有挖掘其文化價(jià)值，這種情況正是由于對傳統(tǒng)村落帶給我們的潛在的非物質(zhì)形態(tài)層面的文化內(nèi)涵以及技術(shù)手法即隱性的村落語匯認(rèn)識不清，可以說對于構(gòu)成嶺南地域文化的語匯元素依舊沒有一個(gè)很系統(tǒng)的歸納和總結(jié)。因此本文將以從化市為例，對體現(xiàn)嶺南地域文化的傳統(tǒng)村落語匯進(jìn)行研究并最終梳理歸納構(gòu)成嶺南特色村落的元素體系。論文第一章對傳統(tǒng)村落保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀背景進(jìn)行概述并對所研究的具體村落對象的合理性進(jìn)行解釋；第二章詳細(xì)介紹從化市的歷史、自然、文化特征和典型傳統(tǒng)村落概況；第三章到第六章分別從村落空間格局、村落環(huán)境、村落建筑、村落隱性語匯四個(gè)大方面對從化的傳統(tǒng)村落的語匯進(jìn)行研究分析和階段性小結(jié)；第七章對所有研究成果進(jìn)歸納梳理和總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:In the current world background, the interaction of the globalization process and the regional cultural protection makes people rethink their attitude towards the traditional village again. In the macroscopic view, it is not difficult to find that the problems that have appeared between the process of globalization and the regional culture have appeared many times in the history, which is nothing more than the cultural field. A process of cultural blending and assimilation. Historically, as a place where people used to work for generations in the past, traditional villages carry too much regional culture and historical value. Therefore, more and more people have already recognized the process of globalization not to replace the local culture carried by the traditional villages, but to make them constantly and foreign countries. The integration of culture is updated and developed.
Nowadays, in Conghua, many villages with traditional south of the Five Ridges characteristics have been preserved. They provide indispensable valuable information for the study of regional culture in south of the Five Ridges. However, there are some deviations in the specific operation of the traditional village protection. On the one hand, the elements of the village of south of the Five Ridges are the dominant village words. The study of the remittance is not perfect. This is due to the one-sided cognition of the whole village style and appearance, and the attention only to some single level, and it does not fully realize the village all the elements that can reflect the traditional way of life and the folk culture; on the other hand, there is a deviation in the cognition of the cultural value of the village. The yardstick between economy and culture is not long enough. For example, some traditional villages have completely become cultural goods that bring economic profits. Developers only pay attention to the economic value, but do not dig their cultural values. This is the result of the cultural connotations and technical hands of the potential non material form to the traditional villages. The recessive village language vocabulary is not understood clearly. It can be said that there is still no systematic summary and summary of the vocabulary elements that constitute the regional culture of South of the Five Ridges. Therefore, this article will take Conghua as an example to study the traditional village fall vocabulary which embodies the regional culture of South of the Five Ridges and finally sort out the element system of the village of South of the Five Ridges. In the first chapter, the background of the traditional village protection is summarized and the rationality of the specific village object is explained. The second chapter introduces the history, nature, cultural characteristics and typical traditional villages in Conghua; the third to the sixth chapters are from the village spatial pattern, village environment, village building and village recessive language, respectively. In the four chapter, the research and analysis of the vocabulary of Conghua's traditional villages are summarized and summarized. The seventh chapter summarizes and summarizes all the research results.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU982.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉沛林;論中國歷史文化村落的“精神空間”[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1996年01期

2 張大玉,歐陽文;傳統(tǒng)村鎮(zhèn)聚落環(huán)境中人之行為活動與場所的分析研究[J];北京建筑工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

3 陳友龍,劉沛林;古村落文化及其載體的互動發(fā)展研究[J];船山學(xué)刊;2005年03期

4 劉沛林;湖南傳統(tǒng)村鎮(zhèn)感應(yīng)空間規(guī)劃研究[J];地理研究;1999年01期

5 程建軍;;嶺南古建筑脊飾探源[J];古建園林技術(shù);1988年04期

6 林忠禮,羅勇;客家與風(fēng)水術(shù)[J];贛南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年04期

7 羅意云;;淺議嶺南民居封火墻[J];中華建設(shè);2011年07期

8 楊星星;賴瑛;;從化呂田地區(qū)圍屋平面布局研究[J];華中建筑;2008年04期

9 陳勛;村落家族文化公共空間的嬗變[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會發(fā)展;2004年03期

10 潘瑩;施瑛;;湘贛民系、廣府民系傳統(tǒng)聚落形態(tài)比較研究[J];南方建筑;2008年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李立敏;村落系統(tǒng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展及其綜合評價(jià)方法研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2011年

本文編號：1906518