本文選題：城市效率 + DEA　； 參考：《西北師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：城市是區(qū)域乃至國家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要增長極，而城市效率又直接決定城市發(fā)展的質(zhì)量，提高城市效率是實(shí)現(xiàn)城市“又好又快”發(fā)展的必要途徑。改革開放以來，中國的城市發(fā)展取得了巨大成就，城市化進(jìn)程不斷加快，城市規(guī)模日益擴(kuò)大，城市經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)增長。然而，中國的城市效率普遍較低，城市發(fā)展中的“高消耗、高污染、低產(chǎn)出”現(xiàn)象明顯，這導(dǎo)致了大量的資源耗費(fèi)，也降低了城市的發(fā)展質(zhì)量。城市效率也逐漸與城市GDP和城市化率一起，成為衡量城市發(fā)展水平的重要指標(biāo)，引起各界的廣泛關(guān)注。 本論文研究內(nèi)容主要包括以下三個(gè)方面：一是建立中國地級及以上城市效率評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系與評價(jià)方法；二是揭示中國地級及以上城市效率在時(shí)間和空間上的演變特征；三是分析中國地級及以上城市效率的影響因素，尋求區(qū)域視角下提高城市效率的現(xiàn)實(shí)路徑。全文共分為五章：第一章為緒論，提出了本次研究的背景、意義、內(nèi)容、思路和方法。第二、三、四章是核心部分，第二章運(yùn)用DEA模型對中國地級及以上城市效率進(jìn)行了測算和評價(jià)。第三章分析了2001~2010年中國地級及以上城市效率的時(shí)空演變特征，并運(yùn)用ESDA探索性空間數(shù)據(jù)分析研究了城市效率的依賴作用和空間溢出效應(yīng)。第四章從資源稟賦、人力資本、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和政策制度等方面分析了城市效率的影響因素，并從區(qū)域視角探討了提高中國城市效率的對策建議。最后，第五章歸納了本文的結(jié)論和創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)，并對不足之處進(jìn)行了討論。本文主要結(jié)論如下： （1）近10年來，中國地級及以上城市效率普遍不高，且城市效率呈現(xiàn)出波動發(fā)展的趨勢，，而中國GDP和城市化率則呈現(xiàn)出逐年遞增的態(tài)勢。中國城市的“發(fā)展”是“高消耗、高污染、低產(chǎn)出”的粗放型增長，只注重地區(qū)GDP和城市化率的提高，而忽視了城市效率的提高。 （2）中國三大地帶間城市效率差異顯著，呈現(xiàn)出東、中、西“階梯型”遞減的分布格局，中國城市效率的分布與三大地帶的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展格局相一致。東部地區(qū)城市效率水平高于全國平均水平，也遠(yuǎn)高于中部和西部地區(qū)，而中部和西部地區(qū)則在全國平均水平以下。城市效率不僅存在空間依賴作用，還存在較強(qiáng)的空間溢出效應(yīng)。 （3）從行政級別來看，中國城市效率分布格局與城市行政級別相一致，城市行政級別越高，城市效率就越高�？傮w來看，2001~2010年中國城市效率呈現(xiàn)出按直轄市、省會和副省級市、地級市“階梯型”遞減的分布態(tài)勢，僅在2001和2007年略有變化。從城市規(guī)模來看，中國城市效率分布格局與城市規(guī)模等級一致，城市規(guī)模等級越高，城市效率就越高。從城市職能來看，中國地級及以上城市效率表現(xiàn)為綜合性城市與專業(yè)型城市之間的差異，綜合性城市的平均城市效率高于專業(yè)型城市的平均城市效率。 （4）技術(shù)效率和規(guī)模效率是制約城市綜合效率的主要方面，但規(guī)模效率的影響要大于技術(shù)效率。中國城市普遍尚未突破“規(guī)模瓶頸”，規(guī)模效率仍是當(dāng)前制約城市綜合效率的主要方面。中國大多數(shù)城市仍處于“成長型”階段，投入相對不足，城市體系多為規(guī)模收益遞增。僅有少部分城市的發(fā)展水平處于較高階段，城市體系達(dá)到了規(guī)模收益不變或規(guī)模收益遞減。 （5）資源稟賦、人力資本、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和政策制度等是造成中國城市效率差異的主要方面。中國三大地帶間城市效率的差異啟示城市在發(fā)展過程中應(yīng)深化改革，加強(qiáng)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和規(guī)模調(diào)整；努力打破區(qū)劃界限，形成合理的區(qū)域發(fā)展格局；打造經(jīng)濟(jì)增長極，發(fā)揮群聚效應(yīng)和輻射效應(yīng)。由此努力提高城市效率，縮小東、中、西部城市發(fā)展差距，形成“東部繁榮、中部崛起、西部開發(fā)”的良好區(qū)域發(fā)展格局。
[Abstract]:City is the important growth pole of regional and national economic development, and urban efficiency directly determines the quality of urban development. Improving urban efficiency is a necessary way to realize the "good and fast" development of the city. Since the reform and opening up, China has made great achievements in urban development, the process of Urbanization is accelerating and the scale of the city is expanding increasingly. Urban economy continues to grow. However, China's urban efficiency is generally low. The phenomenon of "high consumption, high pollution and low production" is obvious in urban development, which leads to a large amount of resource consumption and reduces the quality of urban development. The urban efficiency has gradually become an important point to measure the level of urban development with the urban GDP and urbanization rate. The standard has attracted wide attention from all walks of life.
The research content of this paper mainly includes the following three aspects: first, to establish the index system and evaluation method of Chinese level and above urban efficiency evaluation; two to reveal the evolution characteristics of China's level and above urban efficiency in time and space; three to analyze the factors affecting the efficiency of China's local level and above city and to seek a regional perspective The full text is divided into five chapters. The full text is divided into five chapters: the first chapter is the introduction, which puts forward the background, significance, content, ideas and methods of this study. Second, third, the four chapter is the core part, and the second chapter uses the DEA model to calculate and evaluate the efficiency of Chinese prefecture level and above city. The third chapter analyses the Chinese land in 2001~2010. The spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of urban efficiency at the level and above are studied, and the dependence and spatial spillover effects of urban efficiency are studied by ESDA exploratory spatial data analysis. The fourth chapter analyzes the influence factors of urban efficiency from the aspects of resource endowment, human capital, industrial structure and policy system, and discusses the improvement of China city from a regional perspective. Finally, the fifth chapter summarizes the conclusions and innovations of this paper, and discusses the shortcomings. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1) in recent 10 years, the efficiency of Chinese cities and cities is generally not high, and the urban efficiency has shown a trend of fluctuation and development, while the GDP and urbanization rate in China is increasing year by year. The "development" of Chinese cities is "high consumption, high pollution, low output", and it pays attention to the increase of regional GDP and urbanization rate. The improvement of urban efficiency is ignored.
(2) the difference of urban efficiency between the three regions of China is significant, showing the distribution pattern of the eastward, middle and Western "ladder" decreasing distribution. The distribution of urban efficiency in China is consistent with the economic development pattern of the three regions. The urban efficiency level in the eastern region is higher than the national average level, and is far higher than that in the central and western regions, while the central and western regions are in the central and western regions. Below the national average level, urban efficiency not only has spatial dependence, but also has a strong spatial spillover effect.
(3) from the administrative level, the distribution pattern of urban efficiency in China is in accordance with the urban administrative level, the higher the urban administrative level, the higher the urban efficiency. In general, the urban efficiency of China in 2001~2010 shows the distribution trend of the decline of "ladder type" in the provincial capital City, provincial capital and sub provincial city, and the level city "ladder type", only slightly changed in 2001 and 2007. From the scale of city, the distribution pattern of urban efficiency in China is the same as the scale of urban scale. The higher the urban scale is, the higher the urban efficiency is. From the view of city function, the efficiency of China's level and above is the difference between the comprehensive city and the professional city, and the average urban efficiency of the comprehensive city is higher than that of the professional city. The average city efficiency.
(4) technical efficiency and scale efficiency are the main factors that restrict the comprehensive efficiency of the city, but the impact of scale efficiency is more than technical efficiency. In Chinese cities, the "scale bottleneck" has not been broken out, and the scale efficiency is still the main aspect of restricting the comprehensive efficiency of the city. Only a few cities have a higher level of development, and the urban system has reached the same scale of income or diminishing returns to scale.
(5) resource endowment, human capital, industrial structure and policy system are the main aspects that cause the difference of urban efficiency in China. The difference of urban efficiency among the three regions of China suggests that the city should deepen the reform in the process of development, strengthen the technological innovation and scale adjustment, make efforts to break the boundary of the zoning, and form a reasonable regional development pattern; create a rational regional development pattern; create a reasonable regional development pattern; create a reasonable regional development pattern; create a reasonable regional development pattern; create a reasonable regional development pattern; create a reasonable regional development pattern; create a reasonable regional development pattern; build In order to improve the efficiency of the city and reduce the gap between the East, middle and western cities, a good regional development pattern of "Eastern prosperity, the rise of the central region and the western development" is formed.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU984.2;F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余敦;付永琦;;江西省城市經(jīng)濟(jì)效率分異研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2007年06期

2 舒強(qiáng);王秀云;;江蘇省城市效率差異特征分析[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2007年21期

3 余修斌,任若恩;全要素生產(chǎn)率、技術(shù)效率、技術(shù)進(jìn)步之間的關(guān)系及測算[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2000年02期

4 蔣莉,陳治諫,沈興菊,郭娜;生態(tài)足跡影響因子的定量分析——以中國各省(區(qū)市)1999年生態(tài)足跡為例[J];長江流域資源與環(huán)境;2005年02期

5 許鋒;周一星;;科學(xué)劃分我國城市的職能類型 建立分類指導(dǎo)的擴(kuò)大內(nèi)需政策[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2010年02期

6 宋樹龍,孫賢國,單習(xí)章;論珠江三角洲城市效率及其對城市化影響[J];地理學(xué)與國土研究;1999年03期

7 楊開忠,謝燮;中國城市投入產(chǎn)出有效性的數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析[J];地理學(xué)與國土研究;2002年03期

8 李郇,徐現(xiàn)祥,陳浩輝;20世紀(jì)90年代中國城市效率的時(shí)空變化[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

9 馬榮華;顧朝林;蒲英霞;馬曉冬;朱傳耿;;蘇南沿江城鎮(zhèn)擴(kuò)展的空間模式及其測度[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2007年10期

10 郭騰云;徐勇;王志強(qiáng);;基于DEA的中國特大城市資源效率及其變化[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

本文編號：1844875