本文選題：和而不同 + 園林　； 參考：《南京工業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在人類不可逆轉(zhuǎn)的“現(xiàn)代化、全球化”的進(jìn)程中，代表世界先進(jìn)文明的“西方景觀文化”長期以來一直影響著中國園林景觀設(shè)計(jì)。中國園林景觀文化在遭受西方景觀文化的強(qiáng)勢攻擊和自身文化繼承上缺失和衰落的雙重打擊下已處在非常危險(xiǎn)的歷史境況。因此，本課題期望通過對中西園林景觀設(shè)計(jì)思想比較研究，使得中國的景觀設(shè)計(jì)在傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代、民族與世界的歷史交匯點(diǎn)上，探索出一條既具有時代精神，又具有民族特色與西方“和而不同”的景觀設(shè)計(jì)之路。 本課題核心概念是“和而不同”，，“和”即統(tǒng)一，和諧，它是抽象的，內(nèi)在的；“不同”是具體的，外在的。容“不同”，才能達(dá)到“和”的境界。“和而不同”就是在堅(jiān)持原則的基礎(chǔ)上，不強(qiáng)求一致，承認(rèn)、包容乃至尊重差異,以達(dá)共存共榮。本課題以“和而不同”的哲學(xué)觀結(jié)合中西園林景觀的發(fā)展歷史對中西園林景觀的設(shè)計(jì)思想進(jìn)行了比較研究。 本課題的研究主體內(nèi)容分為兩個方面四個部分： 兩個方面：一是以“和而不同”的視角對中西傳統(tǒng)園林發(fā)展階段以及設(shè)計(jì)思想進(jìn)行比較分析；二是對中西現(xiàn)代景觀“同而不和”現(xiàn)象的研究與批判。 四個部分：1）從中西傳統(tǒng)園林的發(fā)展看“和而不同”； 2）對中西傳統(tǒng)園林設(shè)計(jì)思想的“和”與“不同”進(jìn)行解析； 3）對西方現(xiàn)代景觀“同而不和”的現(xiàn)象批判； 4）在西方現(xiàn)代景觀設(shè)計(jì)影響下，對中國園林景觀與西方現(xiàn)代景觀“同”與“不和”的現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行解析與批判。 本課題結(jié)論：歷史是循環(huán)式向上發(fā)展的，中西方園林景觀在經(jīng)歷了否定之否定發(fā)展過程后，終將重歸“和而不同”的景觀設(shè)計(jì)之路。
[Abstract]:In the irreversible process of "modernization and globalization" of mankind, the "western landscape culture" representing the advanced civilization of the world has long been affecting the landscape design of Chinese gardens. The Chinese garden landscape culture has been under the double attack of the strong attack of Western landscape culture and the lack and decline of its own cultural succession. Therefore, this subject is expected to explore a road of landscape design with both the spirit of the times and the "harmony but different" of the western countries through the comparative study of Chinese and Western landscape design ideas, making Chinese landscape design at the intersection of traditional and modern, national and world history.
The core concept of the subject is "harmony and difference", and "harmony" is unity and harmony. It is abstract and internal; the "difference" is specific, and the external. "Different" can reach the realm of "harmony". "Harmony but different" is on the basis of adhering to the principle, not seeking consistency, recognition, tolerance is the supreme difference, in order to achieve coexistence together glory. In this topic, the philosophy of "harmony but difference" is applied to combine the development history of Chinese and Western landscape architecture.
The main contents of this research are divided into two parts and four parts:
The two aspects: one is to make a comparative analysis of the development stage and design thought of traditional Chinese and Western gardens in the perspective of "harmony and difference", and the two is to study and criticize the phenomenon of "the same but not" in the modern Chinese and Western landscape.
The four part: 1) look at "harmony but difference" from the development of Chinese and western traditional gardens.
2) analyze the "harmony" and "difference" between Chinese and western traditional garden design ideas.
3) criticize the phenomenon of "disharmony" between the western modern landscape.
4) under the influence of western modern landscape design, the phenomenon of "same" and "disharmony" between Chinese landscape and modern western landscape is analyzed and criticized.
The conclusion of the thesis is that history is a circular upward development. The landscape of Chinese and Western gardens will eventually return to the road of "harmony but different" landscape design after the negative negative development process.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU986

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王貴祥;中西文化中自然觀比較(上)[J];重慶建筑;2002年01期

2 王貴祥;中西文化中自然觀比較(下)[J];重慶建筑;2002年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 孫宗美;道家思想與中國園林藝術(shù)精神[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

2 熊瑤;中國傳統(tǒng)園林的現(xiàn)代意義[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

3 邱冰;中國現(xiàn)代園林設(shè)計(jì)語言的本土化研究[D];南京林業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1825592