發(fā)布時間：2018-03-28 15:28

  本文選題：當(dāng)代西方建筑　切入點：建筑符號　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：在“第二媒介時代”的創(chuàng)作視域下，當(dāng)代建筑已演化成一種抽象的隱喻符號，并藉由其兼具信息、交流、敘事、批判與多元化的媒介新屬性，進(jìn)而在當(dāng)代建筑領(lǐng)域中引發(fā)一場以媒介符號為審美主體的“圖形學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向”。而作為對這種新興創(chuàng)作趨勢的研究，本文則以符號化的“建筑語言”為切入點，，并通過探討建筑藝術(shù)與語言的相似性，以及對新型技術(shù)策略與美學(xué)觀念的考量，從而建構(gòu)一種以“語言學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向”影響下所出現(xiàn)的“符號學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向”與“美學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向”為哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)、數(shù)字化建構(gòu)及復(fù)雜性科學(xué)為技術(shù)與理論基礎(chǔ)的當(dāng)代西方建筑符號審美研究體系，并借此分析在后工業(yè)社會、數(shù)字化建造以及后現(xiàn)代哲學(xué)的現(xiàn)實語境中，引發(fā)這種新興建筑思潮的深層原因，以及基于新型創(chuàng)作理念下所出現(xiàn)的各項美學(xué)規(guī)律與審美活動。 在此基礎(chǔ)上，本文采用語言學(xué)分析語言的方式，分析建筑符號的語言系統(tǒng)所具備的美學(xué)品質(zhì)，從而以元美學(xué)作為技術(shù)路線，試圖藉由美學(xué)原理、對象描述、藝術(shù)技巧描述、心理描述以及審美評價的邏輯建構(gòu)，對當(dāng)代西方建筑符號的審美體系進(jìn)行概念界定，并以此選用當(dāng)代語言哲學(xué)中語體學(xué)、語匯學(xué)、語構(gòu)學(xué)、語義學(xué)與語用學(xué)五項理論分支，不但強調(diào)結(jié)合符號學(xué)能指、所指和意指的美學(xué)概念，探討建筑符號所應(yīng)遵循的美學(xué)原理，而且還建構(gòu)起包括描述構(gòu)件元素形式的建筑語匯符號、描述構(gòu)件組織關(guān)系的建筑語構(gòu)符號、描述構(gòu)件觀念內(nèi)容的建筑語義符號，以及描述構(gòu)件存在現(xiàn)象的建筑語用符號在內(nèi)的當(dāng)代西方建筑符號語言系統(tǒng)及其在藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作中所開展的諸項審美活動。 作為對上述四種建筑符號類型發(fā)生審美活動所呈現(xiàn)美學(xué)特征的分析，本文則借助藝術(shù)符號美學(xué)與現(xiàn)象學(xué)中表象、意象、幻像及本象的美學(xué)概念，從而不但指出建筑語匯符號與元素形式的物象表現(xiàn)、建筑語構(gòu)符號與組織關(guān)系的意象表現(xiàn)、建筑語義符號與觀念內(nèi)容的幻像表現(xiàn)、建筑語用符號與存在現(xiàn)象的本象表現(xiàn)之間具備的對應(yīng)關(guān)系，而且還藉此分析與梳理建筑語匯符號物象表現(xiàn)、建筑語構(gòu)符號意象表現(xiàn)、建筑語義符號幻像表現(xiàn)以及建筑語用符號本象表現(xiàn)所指代的新興美學(xué)特征，并在此基礎(chǔ)上，實現(xiàn)對當(dāng)代西方建筑符號審美體系及其藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作的美學(xué)表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)建構(gòu)與理性表達(dá)。
[Abstract]:In the field of creation of the second Media Age, contemporary architecture has evolved into an abstract metaphorical symbol, with its new attributes of information, communication, narration, criticism and pluralism. In the field of contemporary architecture, it leads to a "graphic turn" in which the media symbol is the aesthetic subject. As a study of this new creative trend, this paper takes the symbolic "architectural language" as the breakthrough point. By discussing the similarity between architectural art and language, as well as the consideration of new technical strategies and aesthetic concepts, we can construct a kind of philosophical foundation based on the "semiotic turn" and "aesthetic turn" under the influence of "linguistic turn". The modern western architectural symbol aesthetic research system based on digital construction and complexity science is analyzed in the realistic context of post-industrial society, digital construction and postmodern philosophy. The deep causes of this new architectural trend of thought, as well as various aesthetic laws and aesthetic activities based on the new creative concept. On this basis, this paper analyzes the aesthetic quality of the language system of architectural symbols by means of linguistic analysis of language, thus taking meta-aesthetics as the technical route, trying to use the principles of aesthetics, object description, and artistic skills to describe. Based on the logical construction of psychological description and aesthetic evaluation, this paper defines the aesthetic system of contemporary western architectural symbols, and selects five theoretical branches of contemporary language philosophy, such as stylistics, lexicology, lexicology, semantics and pragmatics. It not only emphasizes the aesthetic concepts of semiotics signifier, signified and implied, but also discusses the aesthetic principles to be followed by architectural symbols, and constructs architectural lexical symbols including the description of element forms of components. The architectural construction symbols that describe the organizational relationship of components, the architectural semantic symbols that describe the contents of component concepts, And the contemporary western architectural symbol language system including architectural pragmatic symbols which describe the existence of components and its aesthetic activities in artistic creation. As an analysis of the aesthetic characteristics of the aesthetic activities of the four architectural symbols, this paper makes use of the aesthetic concepts of representation, image, illusion and original image in art symbol aesthetics and phenomenology. Thus it not only points out the representation of objects in the form of architectural lexical symbols and elements, the image expression of the relationship between architectural construction symbols and organization, the illusion of architectural semantic symbols and the contents of ideas. The corresponding relationship between architectural pragmatic symbols and the original manifestation of existential phenomena is also analyzed and combed, and the expression of architectural symbols is analyzed and combed, as well as the expression of architectural syntactic symbols. On the basis of the new aesthetic features referred to by the phantom representation of architectural semantic symbols and the original representation of architectural pragmatic symbols, To realize the systematic construction and rational expression of the aesthetic system of contemporary western architectural symbols and their artistic creation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU-80

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 虞英;虛空·流動·時間——立體主義之于建筑空間革命的諸多啟示[J];安徽建筑;2004年01期

2 程良友;;論拼貼是后現(xiàn)代主義的創(chuàng)作核心[J];安陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年03期

3 于全有;;關(guān)于“語匯”與“詞匯”稱名之爭問題[J];遼東學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期

4 張欽楠;建筑的“非物質(zhì)化”和“暫息化”[J];讀書;2000年03期

5 崔蕾;;虛擬現(xiàn)實技術(shù)及其應(yīng)用綜述[J];福建電腦;2008年05期

6 馮四清;朱偉偉;;建筑的“非功能”空間設(shè)計[J];工程與建設(shè);2011年02期

7 孔文靜;;文化建筑空間形式的語用學(xué)分析[J];廣西城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè);2011年06期

8 林莆程;;建筑形態(tài)學(xué)與結(jié)構(gòu)主義對建筑設(shè)計的啟示[J];建材世界;2012年01期

9 趙睿;;建筑光環(huán)境設(shè)計中的心理學(xué)因素[J];工業(yè)建筑;2007年S1期

10 朱淑姣;吳衛(wèi);;同質(zhì)異構(gòu)和異質(zhì)同構(gòu)在圖形創(chuàng)意中的符號學(xué)解析[J];河南商業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2008年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張向?qū)?當(dāng)代復(fù)雜性建筑形態(tài)設(shè)計研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1676913