本文關(guān)鍵詞： 再更新 自組織 歷史街區(qū) 功能演變 空間演變　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)正處于經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展、城市化進(jìn)程加速時(shí)期，城市面臨全方位的深刻變革，歷史街區(qū)在城市中的地位及其發(fā)展正面臨極大挑戰(zhàn)。作為城市風(fēng)貌延續(xù)與特色經(jīng)營(yíng)的重要手段，各地城市也在努力探索適于本地發(fā)展條件的更新之路。國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者對(duì)歷史街區(qū)的保護(hù)與更新作出了巨大的理論與實(shí)踐的雙重貢獻(xiàn)，，但卻忽略一個(gè)嚴(yán)峻的問(wèn)題，那就是大量的歷史街區(qū)在經(jīng)過(guò)更新、改造、保護(hù)或破壞之后的如何實(shí)現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。尤其是遭到建設(shè)性破壞、保護(hù)性破壞之后的歷史街區(qū)如何實(shí)現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。從而創(chuàng)造性地提出一個(gè)新的研究話題——?dú)v史街區(qū)再更新。 通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外優(yōu)秀更新理論的研究分析，總結(jié)出眾多理論中的一個(gè)共性，即“有機(jī)性”，并結(jié)合歷史街區(qū)發(fā)展演變過(guò)程的“自發(fā)性”。為更系統(tǒng)地闡述歷史街區(qū)再更新，自組織理論作為研究的框架被引入。歷史街區(qū)再更新在組織方式上與自組織系統(tǒng)是一致的。自組織理論框架下，歷史街區(qū)再更新的原理包括歷史街區(qū)自組織再更新的形成機(jī)制和歷史街區(qū)自組織再更新的動(dòng)力機(jī)制，最終體現(xiàn)在街區(qū)功能體系的再更新和街區(qū)空間體系的再更新兩個(gè)方面。 為進(jìn)一闡述歷史街區(qū)自組織再更新，結(jié)合“再更新”定義的三類限定條件，總結(jié)出再更新的三種類型：功能轉(zhuǎn)換；功能填充；功能重構(gòu)。并選取湖南省會(huì)長(zhǎng)沙歷史街區(qū)再更新類型中三個(gè)各具代表性的歷史街區(qū)2004-2012年功能、空間的演化過(guò)程作為案例，研究歷史街區(qū)自下而上的演化機(jī)制。本研究通過(guò)實(shí)地調(diào)研、訪談、文獻(xiàn)查閱等工作手段，梳理還原了長(zhǎng)沙太平街、化龍池、樊西巷在2004年之后的演化歷程，總結(jié)出長(zhǎng)沙歷史自組織再更新的三類基本模式，即：“修舊合新、風(fēng)貌延續(xù)：太平街”；“存舊換新、文化融合：化龍池”；“破舊立新、文化重塑：樊西巷”。 通過(guò)對(duì)三個(gè)歷史街區(qū)再更新現(xiàn)象的剖析，表明小規(guī)模、民間自發(fā)的改造活動(dòng)對(duì)該歷史地段空間體系的演變產(chǎn)生了主導(dǎo)性的作用。歷史街區(qū)的自組織再更新有利于構(gòu)造城市公共環(huán)境豐富的空間層次以及大量的人文細(xì)節(jié)，實(shí)現(xiàn)歷史地段的動(dòng)態(tài)的，自適應(yīng)的可持續(xù)更新。但由于非理性因素的影響以及漲落周期的不確定，自發(fā)的、自組織的更新模式不能解決所有的城市問(wèn)題，仍需要合理的控制與引導(dǎo)，以適應(yīng)城市快速發(fā)展的需求。
[Abstract]:China is in a period of rapid economic development and urbanization, and cities are facing profound changes in all directions. The status and development of historic blocks in the city is facing great challenges. As an important means of the continuation of urban style and characteristic management. Local cities are also trying to explore the renewal of local development conditions. Domestic scholars have made great theoretical and practical contributions to the protection and renewal of historical blocks, but ignored a severe problem. That is how to achieve sustainable development after a large number of historic blocks have been renovated, renovated, protected or destroyed, especially by constructive destruction. How to realize the sustainable development of the historic district after the protective destruction, and then creatively put forward a new research topic-the renewal of the historical district. Through the research and analysis of the excellent renewal theory at home and abroad, the author summarizes one of the commonness of many theories, that is, "organic property". Combining with the "spontaneity" of the development and evolution process of the historical district, it is necessary to explain the renewal of the historical district more systematically. Self-organization theory is introduced as the framework of the research. The historical district renewal is consistent with the self-organization system in the organizational mode. The principle of historical district renewal includes the formation mechanism of historical district self-organization renewal and the dynamic mechanism of historical district self-organization renewal. Finally, it is reflected in the renewal of the function system of the block and the renewal of the space system of the block. In order to expound the self-organization renewal of the historical district, three types of renewal are summarized: function conversion; combined with the three kinds of qualified conditions defined in the definition of "reupdate"; Functional filling; Function reconstruction. And selected Hunan Hui Changsha historical district renewal type of three representative historical blocks 2004-2012 function, spatial evolution process as a case study. This study through field research, interviews, literature review and other working means, combing and restoring the Taiping Street in Changsha, Hualong Chi. The evolution of Fan Xi Xiang after 2004, summed up three basic models of Changsha history self-organization and renewal, namely: "repair old and new, style continuation: Taiping Street"; "storing the old for the new, cultural integration: Hua Longchi"; Breaking the Old and Building New, reshaping Culture: fan Xi Xiang. Through the analysis of the renewal of three historical blocks, it shows that the small scale. The self-organized renewal of the historical district is beneficial to the construction of the rich spatial level of urban public environment and a large number of humanistic details. . But due to the influence of irrational factors and the uncertainty of fluctuation cycle, spontaneous and self-organizing renewal model can not solve all urban problems. It still needs reasonable control and guidance to meet the needs of rapid development of the city.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：TU984.114

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋曉龍,黃艷;“微循環(huán)式”保護(hù)與更新——北京南北長(zhǎng)街歷史街區(qū)保護(hù)規(guī)劃的理論和方法[J];城市規(guī)劃;2000年11期

2 阮儀三,孫萌;我國(guó)歷史街區(qū)保護(hù)與規(guī)劃的若干問(wèn)題研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2001年10期

3 陳彥光;自組織與自組織城市[J];城市規(guī)劃;2003年10期

4 王景慧;城市歷史文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)的政策與規(guī)劃[J];城市規(guī)劃;2004年10期

5 陳彥光;;中國(guó)城市發(fā)展的自組織特征與判據(jù)——為什么說(shuō)所有城市都是自組織的?[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年08期

6 陳銘;廖慧;;武漢里分的自發(fā)改造問(wèn)題研究[J];華中建筑;2008年06期

7 李丹;魏春雨;;長(zhǎng)沙市太平街改造簡(jiǎn)介[J];山西建筑;2008年09期

8 劉伯英;黃靖;;成都寬窄巷子歷史文化保護(hù)區(qū)的保護(hù)策略[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

9 陳U

本文編號(hào)：1464562