本文關(guān)鍵詞： 空間格局 多中心網(wǎng)絡(luò) 中原城市群　出處：《河南大學》2013年博士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著全球經(jīng)濟和科技的快速發(fā)展，現(xiàn)代城市的功能逐步向更大的區(qū)域范圍拓展，城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展的區(qū)域化態(tài)勢呈現(xiàn)，城市與城市之間的相互聯(lián)系和影響日益密切，一定地域范圍內(nèi)的諸多大、中、小城市相互交織成的城市群，在全球城鎮(zhèn)體系中日益占據(jù)重要的樞紐地位，成為國家參與全球競爭與國際分工的全新地域單元。各國政府和專家學者都非常重視城市群的科學研究。黨的十八大報告明確提出的“科學規(guī)劃城市群規(guī)模和布局”任務(wù)，，那么，在中原城市群地區(qū)，其空間格局是如何演化的？是單中心引領(lǐng)還是多中心發(fā)展？中原城市群最適宜的空間發(fā)展模式是什么？這些都是中原城市群發(fā)展過程中亟待解決的應用性研究課題。 本文前三章由緒論、文獻綜述、理論基礎(chǔ)與分析框架等構(gòu)成。該部分主要界定研究對象和研究內(nèi)容，梳理理論基礎(chǔ)，確定分析框架。第四章主要對中原城市群空間格局演變進行了深入分析。第五章從產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展與空間關(guān)聯(lián)角度對中原城市群的多中心性進行了論證。第六章基于“流”視角進一步探討了中原城市群的網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間。在此基礎(chǔ)上，第七章對中原城市群多中心網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間發(fā)展模式及其建構(gòu)進行了辨識。第八章是總結(jié)與展望，總結(jié)主要研究結(jié)論，并提出進一步研究的方向。研究的主要結(jié)論如下： （1）透過城市人口要素、經(jīng)濟要素、產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展、社會發(fā)展等指標，再現(xiàn)了中原城市群的空間格局及演變過程，并在此基礎(chǔ)上形成了對中原城市群空間發(fā)展格局的新認識。一方面，中原城市群的碎化式空間布局特征，為城市群城市功能性的多中心發(fā)展奠定了重要的基礎(chǔ)和條件。另一方面，中原城市群的“中心-外圍”結(jié)構(gòu)日益顯著，其空間發(fā)展的“去單核化”特征和“多中心性”比較顯著，二三產(chǎn)業(yè)空間發(fā)展也同樣呈現(xiàn)明顯的多中心結(jié)構(gòu)。再一方面，中原城市群在人口和產(chǎn)業(yè)的空間循環(huán)運動方面具有非均衡發(fā)展和極化發(fā)展的特征，但在整體空間發(fā)展上處于均質(zhì)發(fā)展狀態(tài)。值得關(guān)注的是，鄭州市在中原城市群乃至中原經(jīng)濟區(qū)的極核地位尚未完全形成，仍處于“弱核帶動”的發(fā)展狀態(tài)，而一些具有發(fā)展?jié)撃芮铱焖偌郯l(fā)展的中心城市正在形成，這為中原城市群多中心并存發(fā)展的態(tài)勢和發(fā)展路徑提供了現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ)和可能性。 （2）基于產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展和空間關(guān)聯(lián)視角發(fā)現(xiàn)，中原城市群在空間發(fā)展上具有顯著的多中心性。一方面，以工業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)為主的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚區(qū)，在中原城市群的區(qū)域空間上呈現(xiàn)出多中心的發(fā)展格局。另一方面，中原城市群主導產(chǎn)業(yè)的圈層結(jié)構(gòu)比較明顯。以此為基礎(chǔ)，在中原城市群區(qū)域，貫穿主要中心城市的產(chǎn)業(yè)軸帶基本形成，形成一條北至中原城市群的最北部，覆蓋新鄉(xiāng)、焦作和濟源的大部分地區(qū)，南至許昌、平頂山和漯河市部分區(qū)域的南北條帶狀產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)域。另外，本文還發(fā)現(xiàn)，中原城市群城市間經(jīng)濟聯(lián)系強度在不斷提升，圍繞鄭州、洛陽、許昌三個中心城市正在形成三大核心發(fā)展區(qū)域，這是中原城市群多中心性特征的一個重要體現(xiàn)。 （3）基于“流”的視角發(fā)現(xiàn)，通過道路交通網(wǎng)絡(luò)和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)，中原城市群正在日益呈現(xiàn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)式空間發(fā)展。一方面，在中原城市群公路里程穩(wěn)步增長的背景下，中原城市群的區(qū)域交通網(wǎng)絡(luò)已經(jīng)形成，圍繞鄭州、洛陽和許昌等三個中心城市正構(gòu)建起一個貫通其他城市的中原城市群交通網(wǎng)絡(luò)。另一方面，根據(jù)高速網(wǎng)絡(luò)交通流量、四級公路網(wǎng)絡(luò)交通流量和鐵路流量的分析，進一步凸顯了鄭州、洛陽、許昌在中原城市群網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間結(jié)構(gòu)中的中心樞紐地位。再一方面，從貨流量、客流量和城際公交客流量看，以鄭州為單一中心的網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)正在轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橐脏嵵荨⒙尻�、許昌為多中心的網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)。 （4）嘗試性提出中原城市群的空間發(fā)展模式——多中心網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展模式，以及“多中心內(nèi)聚”和“網(wǎng)絡(luò)式外聯(lián)”的深度整合途徑。一方面，辨析了中原城市群多中心網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間發(fā)展模式的科學性和合理性。另一方面，提出了中原城市群多中心網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間發(fā)展模式的構(gòu)成，認為中原城市群多中心網(wǎng)絡(luò)式空間發(fā)展模式中主要包含鄭州市、洛陽市和許昌市三個中心，并可劃分出圍繞三個中心城市形成的“中心-外圍”發(fā)展區(qū)域，即以鄭州市為中心的“鄭州-開封-新鄉(xiāng)-焦作”菱形核心發(fā)展區(qū)域；以洛陽市為中心的“洛陽-濟源”核心發(fā)展區(qū)域；以許昌為中心的“許昌-平頂山-漯河”三角形核心發(fā)展區(qū)域。尤其是，本文進一步拓展了城市群深度整合理論“內(nèi)聚-外聯(lián)”的內(nèi)涵和外延，提出中原城市群可通過“多中心內(nèi)聚”和“網(wǎng)絡(luò)式外聯(lián)”實現(xiàn)深度整合。 在此基礎(chǔ)上，本文有兩個新的發(fā)現(xiàn)： （1）通過再現(xiàn)中原城市群的空間格局及演變過程發(fā)現(xiàn)，以鄭州為單核的中原城市群空間發(fā)展格局正在發(fā)生變化，逐漸從“弱核帶動”向“多中心格局”轉(zhuǎn)變，這為重新辨識中原城市群的空間發(fā)展模式提供了認識論基礎(chǔ)。另一方面，中原城市群城市人口的碎化式空間發(fā)展、新興中心城市的日益凸顯、城市人口與產(chǎn)業(yè)空間循環(huán)行為的非均衡發(fā)展和極化發(fā)展、各節(jié)點城市的均質(zhì)和碎化式發(fā)展，以及鄭州在中原城市群和中原經(jīng)濟區(qū)的弱核牽引地位，對重新認識中原城市群的空間發(fā)展模式提供了重要的現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ)。 （2）在城市群的空間發(fā)展模式上，進一步拓展了城市群深度整合理論，尤其是拓展了“內(nèi)聚-外聯(lián)”的內(nèi)涵和外延，提出中原城市群在空間發(fā)展模式上可通過“多中心內(nèi)聚”和“網(wǎng)絡(luò)式外聯(lián)”實現(xiàn)深度整合。中原城市群的深度整合，既需要“多中心內(nèi)聚”，圍繞鄭州、洛陽和許昌三個中心城市進行有序內(nèi)聚或分區(qū)域內(nèi)聚發(fā)展，又需要“網(wǎng)絡(luò)式外聯(lián)”，把“網(wǎng)絡(luò)式外聯(lián)”作為中原城市群強化和提升內(nèi)聚發(fā)展及聯(lián)動發(fā)展的重要策略。尤為重要的是，通過“多中心內(nèi)聚”和“網(wǎng)絡(luò)式外聯(lián)”相輔相成，同步發(fā)展和深度整合，中原城市群將成為一個“多中心內(nèi)聚”和“網(wǎng)絡(luò)式外聯(lián)”協(xié)同互補的有機整體。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the global economy and technology, the function of modern city and gradually expand to the wider region, showing the regional trend of urbanization development, between the city and the city of mutual connection and influence is increasingly close, in a certain geographical area, many large and small city interwoven into the city, become an important hub in the global urban system, has become a country in the new geographical unit of global competition and the international division of labor. Governments and experts and scholars have attached great importance to scientific research city group. The eighteen Party's report clearly put forward the "scientific planning of city group size and layout task, then, in the group of city of Central Plains area. The spatial pattern is how evolution? Is the monocentric or polycentric development? What is the most suitable space of Zhongyuan city cluster development model? These are the Central Plains city group development The application research topic that needs to be solved urgently in the process.
The first three chapters of the thesis consists of introduction, literature review, theoretical basis and analysis framework. This part mainly defines the research object and the research content, theoretical basis, determine the analytical framework. The fourth chapter of the group of city of Central Plains spatial pattern evolution is analyzed. The fifth chapter has carried on the proof to the multi center of central China city group from the perspective of industrial development and spatial correlation. The sixth chapter is based on the "flow" perspective to further explore the city group of Central Plains network space. On this basis, the seventh chapter development mode and construction of the Central Plains city group center network space for identification. The eighth chapter is the summary and outlook, summarized the main research conclusions, and proposes further research the direction of the main research results are as follows:
(1) through the city population factors, economic factors, industrial development, social development and other indicators, reproduce the spatial pattern and evolution process of city group of Central Plains, and on the basis of the formation of a new understanding of the spatial development pattern of city group of Central Plains. On the one hand, the fragmentation of space layout characteristics of central China city group, established the city is an important foundation and conditions of functional groups of multi center city development. On the other hand, the Central Plains city group "center - periphery" structure is increasing, the development of space "to core" characteristic and "multi center" is significant, the two or three industry development space also presents multi center structure. In another aspect, Zhongyuan city group in the space circulation of population and industry has the characteristics of non balanced development and polarization development, but in the homogeneous development in the whole space development. The concern is that Zhengzhou Core city in Central China city group and the Central Plains Economic Zone has not yet fully formed, is still in the "development of the weak nuclear drive", and some have development potential and fast cluster development center of the city is being formed, which provides the realistic foundation and possibility for the center of Zhongyuan city cluster coexist development trend and development path.
(2) found that the industrial development and spatial correlation based on the perspective of Zhongyuan city group in the development of multi center space has significant. On the one hand, the industry dominated the industrial gathering area, showing the development of the regional spatial pattern of multi center in Central China city group. On the other hand, the leading group of city of Central Plains circle structure the industry is obvious. On this basis, in the group of city of Central Plains area, with the basic formation of the main shaft through the industrial center of the city, the formation of a central city to the north of the northern group, covering Xinxiang, Jiaozuo and most of Jiyuan, south of Xuchang, North and South Strip industrial areas of Pingdingshan and Luohe area. In addition, we also found that the strength of economic ties between the city group of city of Central Plains rising, around Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Xuchang three center city is the formation of the three core development area, which is the Central Plains city group An important embodiment of the centrality.
(3) based on the "flow" of the view that, through the road traffic network and the Internet, are increasingly showing the city group of Central Plains network space development. On the one hand, the steady growth in the highway mileage of Zhongyuan city group under the background of the regional traffic network of Zhongyuan city group has been formed, around Zhengzhou, Luoyang and Xuchang three center city is to build a city through the other group of city of Central Plains traffic network. On the other hand, according to the high-speed network traffic analysis, four highway network traffic and railway traffic, and further highlights the Zhengzhou, Luoyang, in the city group of Central Plains Network Spatial Structure in the center of the hub of Xuchang. On the other hand, from the cargo traffic, traffic and intercity bus traffic, network structure in Zhengzhou as the single center is moving to Zhengzhou, Luoyang, is a multi center network structure in Xuchang.
(4) put forward Zhongyuan city group space development mode, the development mode of network multi center, the depth of integration and "polycentric cohesion" and "network outreach". On the one hand, the scientific analysis of the group of city of Central Plains polycentric spatial development pattern and rationality. On the other hand, is put forward a multi center network of Zhongyuan city group development model, that the space group of multi center network of central city development model mainly includes the city of Zhengzhou, the three center of Luoyang city and Xuchang City, and can be divided into three centers around the city to form a "center periphery" development area in Zhengzhou City as the center "Zhengzhou - Xinxiang - Jiaozuo - Kaifeng" diamond core development area; taking Luoyang city as the center of the "Luoyang - Jiyuan" core development area; with Xuchang as the center of the "Xuchang - Pingdingshan - Luohe triangle nuclear heart In particular, this paper further expands the connotation and extension of the theory of cohesive outreach in the theory of deep integration of urban agglomeration, and points out that Zhongyuan urban agglomeration can achieve deep integration through "multi center cohesion" and "network external connection".
On this basis, this article has two new discoveries:
(1) by reproducing the spatial pattern and evolution of Zhongyuan city group, with Zhengzhou as the central city space single core group development pattern is changing gradually from the "weak nuclear drive" to "multi center" pattern of change, which provides the epistemological foundation for the re identification of Zhongyuan city group space development mode on the other hand, fragmentation of space city population of central China city group development center, new city has become increasingly prominent, non balanced development and development of city population and the industrial spatial polarization of cyclic behavior, each node of city of homogeneous and fragmentation type development, and Zhengzhou city clusters in the Central Plains and the Central Plains Economic zone weak nuclear the traction position, provide a realistic basis for re understanding the important group of city of Central Plains spatial development pattern.
(2) in the group of city space development model, to further expand the depth of integration of city group theory, particularly the expansion of the connotation and extension of "cohesion outreach", the group of city of Central Plains in the space development mode through the "polycentric cohesion" and "network outreach" to realize the depth of integration. The depth of integration Zhongyuan city group, not only need to "polycentric cohesion", around Zhengzhou, Luoyang and Xuchang three center city orderly cohesion or subregional cohesion and development, need to "network outreach", "network outreach" as an important strategy to strengthen and enhance the cohesion of Zhongyuan city group development and joint development is particularly important. Is that the "polycentric cohesion" and "network outreach" complement each other, and the synchronous development of the depth of integration, the Central Plains city group will become a "polycentric cohesion" and "network outreach" complementary with CO The whole machine.

【學位授予單位】：河南大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU982.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陸大道;;我國區(qū)域發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略、態(tài)勢及京津冀協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展分析[J];北京社會科學;2008年06期

2 韋亞平;趙民;;都市區(qū)空間結(jié)構(gòu)與績效——多中心網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)的解釋與應用分析[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年04期

3 仇保興;;緊湊度和多樣性——我國城市可持續(xù)發(fā)展的核心理念[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年11期

4 房慶方,楊細平,蔡瀛;區(qū)域協(xié)調(diào)和可持續(xù)發(fā)展──珠江三角洲經(jīng)濟區(qū)城市群規(guī)劃及其實施[J];城市規(guī)劃;1997年01期

5 王德忠,莊仁興;區(qū)域經(jīng)濟聯(lián)系定量分析初探——以上海與蘇錫常地區(qū)經(jīng)濟聯(lián)系為例[J];地理科學;1996年01期

6 方磊,劉宏;我國城市分類和城市發(fā)展問題的初步研究[J];地理學報;1988年01期

7 曹小曙,閻小培;經(jīng)濟發(fā)達地區(qū)交通網(wǎng)絡(luò)演化對通達性空間格局的影響——以廣東省東莞市為例[J];地理研究;2003年03期

8 王發(fā)曾;郭志富;劉曉麗;趙威;;基于城市群整合發(fā)展的中原地區(qū)城市體系結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化[J];地理研究;2007年04期

9 王發(fā)曾;王新濤;;我國城市群發(fā)展中的物流、信息流整合[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2010年03期

10 歐陽\

本文編號：1449797