從建構(gòu)的視角出發(fā)探討結(jié)構(gòu)策略與建筑形態(tài)的相關(guān)性研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞:從建構(gòu)的視角出發(fā)探討結(jié)構(gòu)策略與建筑形態(tài)的相關(guān)性研究 出處:《南京工業(yè)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文 論文類(lèi)型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 建構(gòu) 結(jié)構(gòu)策略 建筑形態(tài) 空間
【摘要】:伴隨著建筑學(xué)的發(fā)展,對(duì)人文性與技術(shù)性的探討一直是人們廣泛關(guān)注的重要課題。建構(gòu)理論的出現(xiàn),在一定程度上解釋了建筑中技術(shù)與藝術(shù)、結(jié)構(gòu)與形式的相關(guān)性。在當(dāng)下創(chuàng)新意識(shí)向生產(chǎn)效率妥協(xié)的行業(yè)背景中,對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)要素的思考趨向于選擇性的模式化,偏離了結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)的本質(zhì)。因此,本文試圖從建構(gòu)理論的視角出發(fā),通過(guò)對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)基本原理和相關(guān)概念的深刻剖析,在思想和手法層面探討出結(jié)構(gòu)策略的創(chuàng)新潛力;同時(shí)選取具有代表性的建筑師和結(jié)構(gòu)工程師,對(duì)他們所持的觀點(diǎn)、作品以及合作方式進(jìn)行總結(jié)歸納,以期在學(xué)科分離的當(dāng)代語(yǔ)境下,為設(shè)計(jì)師提出一種具有可操作性的實(shí)踐方式,并呼吁整體性的結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)策略。 文章以結(jié)構(gòu)的力學(xué)原理為分析切入點(diǎn),繼而引出結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)的本質(zhì),即力流的改向。通過(guò)對(duì)結(jié)構(gòu)與空間相關(guān)性的思考,打破了結(jié)構(gòu)僅作為構(gòu)造要素的單一屬性,強(qiáng)調(diào)了美學(xué)要求和構(gòu)造要素的一致性,,并以對(duì)傳統(tǒng)思維中結(jié)構(gòu)合理性的再詮釋?zhuān)卣沽私Y(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)的概念邊界,把結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)要求重新放置回大的建筑概念中,同其他設(shè)計(jì)要素并置,得出一種整體性的結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)策略。在實(shí)踐層面,通過(guò)對(duì)設(shè)計(jì)過(guò)程中建筑師和結(jié)構(gòu)工程師具體工作方式的總結(jié),反思了雙方對(duì)待結(jié)構(gòu)問(wèn)題時(shí)所持的消極態(tài)度,基于得出的理論結(jié)果,呼吁設(shè)計(jì)師在工作中更為積極的交流配合,以細(xì)致靈活的態(tài)度實(shí)現(xiàn)技藝交融的整體性建筑。文章最后對(duì)全文在思想和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)層面的論述進(jìn)行總結(jié),消解了慣性的結(jié)構(gòu)思維定式從而拓寬了結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)邊界,并指出正因?yàn)樵诮ㄖ亩嘣w系中,一種追求創(chuàng)新和詩(shī)意表達(dá)的建筑類(lèi)型存在,客觀的證明了建筑與結(jié)構(gòu)學(xué)科知識(shí)體系再融合的必要性和趨向性。
[Abstract]:Along with the development of architecture, to explore the humanities and technology has been an important topic of concern. The construction of the theory, to a certain extent, explains the technology and architecture art, relationship between structure and form. The production efficiency to compromise industry background in the current sense of innovation, mode of thinking of the structure elements tend to be selective, deviate from the essence of the structural design. Therefore, this thesis tries to construct the theory, through the profound analysis to the basic principle and structure of the related concepts, discusses the structure of strategy innovation potential in the thought and technique level; and selecting representative architects and structural engineers, for their the viewpoints of work and cooperation are summarized, in the contemporary context of disciplinary separation for the designer to put forward a feasible way to practice, And call for a holistic structure design strategy.
Based on the principle of structural mechanics for the analysis of the starting point, and then leads to the nature of the structural design, namely the flow of force to change. By thinking on the structure and spatial correlation, break the structure only as a single attribute of structural elements, emphasizing the consistency of the aesthetic requirements and structural elements, and the structure of the traditional thinking again the interpretation of rationality, extends the concept of boundary structure design, the structure design requirements back onto the large building concept, with other design elements that juxtaposition, a holistic structure design strategy. In practice, the architects and structural engineers in the design process of the specific work summary, reflects their the two sides treat structure issues of negative attitude, theoretical results based on the appeal of a designer at work more actively cooperate with with meticulous attitude to achieve flexible blend of the whole art The body of the building. In the final part of the paper discusses two aspects of theory and practice summary, digestion of the structure of the inertia of thinking pattern so as to broaden the structural design boundary, and pointed out that because of the diversification of system building, there is an expression of the pursuit of innovation and poetic architectural type, objectively proved the necessity of system the construction and structure of subject knowledge and fusion and tendency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:TU201
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 虞剛;表皮·類(lèi)型·空間——紐特林和李迪克事務(wù)所作品印象[J];華中建筑;2003年04期
2 趙彬;覃小燕;;美國(guó)捷得國(guó)際建筑師事務(wù)所:場(chǎng)所制造與體驗(yàn)性設(shè)計(jì)——上海久百城市廣場(chǎng)述評(píng)[J];華中建筑;2006年01期
3 王青;胡辭;;構(gòu)成派、白色派、解構(gòu)派——20世紀(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)主義思想的建筑實(shí)踐[J];華中建筑;2006年03期
4 俞傳飛;韓崗;;從圖解到影像——當(dāng)代數(shù)字媒介對(duì)建筑設(shè)計(jì)表現(xiàn)的影響及其應(yīng)用[J];城市建筑;2010年06期
5 王昌寧;場(chǎng)所與環(huán)境空間的制造──美國(guó)“捷得”商業(yè)建筑設(shè)計(jì)理念[J];建筑創(chuàng)作;2002年Z1期
6 虞剛;圖解的力量——閱讀格雷格·林恩的《形式表達(dá)——建筑設(shè)計(jì)中圖解的原-功能潛力》[J];建筑師;2004年04期
7 李翔寧;圖像、消費(fèi)與建筑[J];建筑師;2004年04期
8 徐衛(wèi)國(guó);;非線(xiàn)性建筑設(shè)計(jì)[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);2005年12期
9 任相松;崔博;;淺析公共建筑中庭的空間設(shè)計(jì)[J];建筑設(shè)計(jì)管理;2011年02期
10 愛(ài)德華·F·塞克勒;凌琳;;結(jié)構(gòu),建造,建構(gòu)[J];時(shí)代建筑;2009年02期
本文編號(hào):1389567
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/sgjslw/1389567.html