本文選題：個人數(shù)據(jù)　切入點：個人數(shù)據(jù)安全　出處：《四川省社會科學院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著以云存儲、云計算為標志的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)不斷發(fā)展,海量數(shù)據(jù)所隱藏的價值被不斷挖掘,科學技術(shù)一方面充當著社會變革者的角色,另一方面打破了舊有社會形態(tài)和思維慣性。技術(shù)進步?jīng)_撞著倫理、道德、法律的藩籬,其中的積極因素可能被社會規(guī)則吸收,而消極因素往往就會引起新的社會問題和制度缺漏。我們驚嘆于數(shù)據(jù)在改善社會供需的精準預(yù)測和資源配置上發(fā)揮的巨大作用,然而數(shù)據(jù)引發(fā)的社會問題——尤其是個人數(shù)據(jù)安全的問題卻不斷成為人們生活中的擔憂。社會的演進總是處在“創(chuàng)新生產(chǎn)力”與“規(guī)避負面性”的漩渦之中,相應(yīng)的制度保護就應(yīng)運而生,也可以看做是技術(shù)創(chuàng)新而引起社會變革的邊際成本。一項制度并不是一個靜態(tài)的、封閉的概念預(yù)設(shè),它隨著技術(shù)進步、社會形態(tài)變遷而不斷演化。事實上技術(shù)化的數(shù)據(jù)應(yīng)用始終走在制度化的個人數(shù)據(jù)安全保護的前面,使得制度保護在后面疲于追趕,這里面有兩重因素,第一重因素是現(xiàn)有的個人數(shù)據(jù)安全保護理念依舊沒有跳出傳統(tǒng)模式,舊式思維已經(jīng)不能適應(yīng)現(xiàn)代社會形態(tài)的復(fù)雜性和易變性;第二重因素是即便能夠?qū)彆r度勢、創(chuàng)新個人數(shù)據(jù)安全保護的理念、思路,但在配套的制度設(shè)計、決策、執(zhí)行上停滯不前,造成個人數(shù)據(jù)安全保護在立法、監(jiān)管上的脫節(jié)。本文分為五個部分,第一部分作為基本概念介紹,對個人數(shù)據(jù)和個人數(shù)據(jù)安全分別做了界定和分析;第二部分對傳統(tǒng)個人數(shù)據(jù)安全理論進行解構(gòu),分析了個人數(shù)據(jù)安全法律保護的必要性,為個人數(shù)據(jù)安全制度的完善引領(lǐng)新的方向;第三部分分析了我國個人數(shù)據(jù)安全面臨的問題和原因;第四部分介紹了外國對相關(guān)問題的經(jīng)驗和對我國的啟發(fā);第五部分嘗試構(gòu)建我國個人數(shù)據(jù)安全保護的規(guī)制路徑。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of Internet technology marked by cloud storage and cloud computing, the hidden value of massive data is constantly being excavated. On the one hand, science and technology are acting as social revolutionaries. On the other hand, it breaks down the old social formation and the inertia of thinking. The technological progress bumps into the barriers of ethics, morality and law, and the positive factors among them may be absorbed by the social rules. Negative factors often lead to new social problems and institutional gaps. We marvel at the enormous role that data plays in improving accurate forecasting of social supply and demand and resource allocation. However, the social problems caused by data-especially the issue of personal data security-have been a constant concern in people's lives. The evolution of society is always in the whirlpool of "innovation productivity" and "avoiding negativity". The corresponding institutional protection arises at the historic moment, and can also be seen as the marginal cost of social change caused by technological innovation. An institution is not a static, closed conceptual presupposition. In fact, the technical data application has always been in front of the institutionalized personal data security protection, which makes the institutional protection tired of catching up. There are two factors in this. The first factor is that the existing concept of personal data security protection is still not out of the traditional mode, the old thinking can no longer adapt to the complexity and variability of modern social formation; the second factor is that even if the situation can be judged, Innovation of personal data security protection concept, ideas, but in supporting system design, decision-making, implementation of stagnation, resulting in personal data security protection in the legislative, regulatory disconnect. This paper is divided into five parts, The first part, as the basic concept, defines and analyzes the personal data and personal data security, the second part deconstructs the traditional personal data security theory, and analyzes the necessity of the legal protection of personal data security. The third part analyzes the problems and causes of personal data security in our country, the 4th part introduces the experiences of foreign countries and enlightens our country. Part 5th attempts to construct the regulation path of personal data security protection in China.
【學位授予單位】：四川省社會科學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.16;TP309

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳紅;;個人信息保護的法律問題研究[J];浙江學刊;2008年03期

2 劉s，

本文編號：1621230