本文關(guān)鍵詞： 比較觀點(diǎn) 在線評(píng)論 情感分析　出處：《現(xiàn)代圖書情報(bào)技術(shù)》2016年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：【目的】對(duì)比較觀點(diǎn)挖掘和相關(guān)研究的主流研究方法和步驟進(jìn)行綜述,為相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的未來研究提供指導(dǎo)�！疚墨I(xiàn)范圍】從Wo S,Google Scholar,CNKI中以"比較觀點(diǎn)(Comparative Opinion)"、"比較句識(shí)別(Comparative Sentence)"、"比較關(guān)系(Comparative Relation)"等為檢索詞篩選獲得55篇相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)�！痉椒ā炕谖墨I(xiàn)調(diào)研,介紹比較范疇的劃分、比較句識(shí)別、比較關(guān)系抽取和比較觀點(diǎn)情感分析等研究進(jìn)展�！窘Y(jié)果】由于有限的序列規(guī)則,比較觀點(diǎn)的識(shí)別難以進(jìn)一步提高,對(duì)隱形比較觀點(diǎn)的識(shí)別研究鮮有提及,并且現(xiàn)有的抽取技術(shù)難以很好地提取比較要素。此外,比較觀點(diǎn)缺乏細(xì)粒度的情感分析�！揪窒蕖咳狈�(duì)現(xiàn)有比較觀點(diǎn)識(shí)別方法的對(duì)比分析。【結(jié)論】本文提出的研究框架可以為未來進(jìn)一步研究提供參考。此外,未來的工作重點(diǎn)應(yīng)關(guān)注通過比較觀點(diǎn)識(shí)別追蹤潛在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手,分析產(chǎn)品競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,以及提供不同商品的對(duì)比分析等。
[Abstract]:[objective] to review the main research methods and procedures of comparative point of view mining and related research, To provide guidance for future research in related fields. [methods] 55 relevant articles were obtained from Wo Sj Google Scholarn CNKI by comparative opinion, comparative sentence identification and comparative comparison relationship. [methods] based on literature research, 55 relevant articles were obtained from the screening of key words, such as "Comparative relationship", "Comparative relationship", and "Comparative comparison relationship". [methods] based on literature research, we obtained 55 relevant articles from "comparative opinion", "comparative sentence identification", "comparative comparative relationship", and "comparative comparative relationship". This paper introduces the classification of comparative categories, the recognition of comparative sentences, the extraction of comparative relations and the affective analysis of comparative views. [results] because of the limited sequence rules, it is difficult to improve the recognition of comparative views. The research on the recognition of invisible comparative views is seldom mentioned, and the existing extraction techniques are difficult to extract the comparative elements well. The comparative viewpoint lacks fine-grained affective analysis. [limitations] there is a lack of comparative analysis of existing comparative viewpoint recognition methods. [conclusion] the research framework proposed in this paper can provide a reference for further research. Future work should focus on identifying potential competitors through a comparative perspective, analyzing product competitiveness, and providing comparative analysis of different products.
【作者單位】： 同濟(jì)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院;上海通用汽車銷售有限公司;華僑大學(xué)工商管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“在線評(píng)論對(duì)商家銷售業(yè)績的影響:情感分析視角”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):71371144);國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“中文語境下基于模糊本體的用戶在線評(píng)論的情感分析”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):70971099) 上海市哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃課題(一般項(xiàng)目)“在線消費(fèi)者評(píng)論對(duì)商家銷售業(yè)績的影響:情感分析的視角”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):2013BGL004)的研究成果之一
【分類號(hào)】：TP391.1
，

本文編號(hào)：1510364