倫理學容量與農業(yè)文明發(fā)展的史學啟示
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-12 14:08
【摘要】：倫理學容量意指社會倫理觀對各類社會組分的系統(tǒng)性包容,藉以保持社會穩(wěn)定。社會在系統(tǒng)耦合中發(fā)生系統(tǒng)進化,釋放生產潛力,推動社會進步。系統(tǒng)耦合與系統(tǒng)相悖并發(fā)。前者釋放生產潛力,為社會進步的正值,后者反之,為系統(tǒng)進步的負值。中國農業(yè)社會為城鄉(xiāng)二元結構,其系統(tǒng)耦合所生產正值,即社會效益,絕大部分為社會強勢的城市占有,是為社會發(fā)展的受益方;而系統(tǒng)相悖發(fā)生的負值,則由社會弱勢方農村全部承擔,所獲社會發(fā)展效益甚少,或根本不得效益,是為社會發(fā)展的少受益方,或受害方。因而城市與鄉(xiāng)村形成利益對立的雙方。以往對社會進化弱勢群體關注不足,或阻礙社會發(fā)展,或發(fā)展為社會亂源。在皇權社會的農耕文明,勉強保持了倫理學容量的脆弱穩(wěn)定。但在后工業(yè)化的今天,社會系統(tǒng)多元化迅速發(fā)展,多重系統(tǒng)耦合與系統(tǒng)相悖并存,其社會矛盾遠非原來的農耕文明倫理容量所能包容。中國農民從西周以來所背負的不公正待遇,引發(fā)系列社會問題,嚴重阻礙社會發(fā)展。當前全球一體化的大潮下,社會發(fā)展勢不可擋,實現農業(yè)現代化勢所必然,與之相適應的倫理學容量勢必巨大擴容,新的農業(yè)倫理學已經曙光初現。
[Abstract]:Ethical capacity refers to the systematic tolerance of social ethics to various social components in order to maintain social stability. In the system coupling, the society evolves systematically, releases the productive potential, and promotes the social progress. System coupling is incompatible with system concurrency. The former releases the potential of production for the positive value of social progress, whereas the latter is negative for the progress of the system. China's agricultural society is urban-rural dual structure, its system coupling production positive, namely social benefits, most of the strong social urban occupation, is the beneficiary of social development; However, the negative value of the system will be borne by the socially disadvantaged rural areas, and the social development benefits will be very little or no benefit at all. It is the less beneficiary or the aggrieved party of the social development. As a result, cities and villages form the interests of the two opposing sides. In the past, insufficient attention was paid to the social evolution of vulnerable groups, or hindered social development, or developed into a source of social disorder. In the imperial society, the farming civilization managed to maintain the fragile stability of ethical capacity. However, in the post-industrialization era, the social system is developing rapidly, and the coupling of multiple systems and the contradiction of the system coexist, and the social contradiction is far from the original ethical capacity of agricultural civilization. The unfair treatment of Chinese farmers since the Western Zhou Dynasty has caused a series of social problems and seriously hindered social development. Under the current tide of global integration, the social development is unstoppable, the realization of agricultural modernization is inevitable, the corresponding capacity of ethics is bound to be greatly expanded, and the new agricultural ethics has emerged at the dawn.
【作者單位】： 中國草業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究中心草地農業(yè)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)國家重點實驗室農業(yè)部草牧業(yè)創(chuàng)新重點實驗室;蘭州大學哲學社會學院;
【基金】：中國工程院重點咨詢項目“中國草業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究” 2016年國家社科基金西部項目“生態(tài)文明戰(zhàn)略視域中的‘中國農業(yè)倫理學’研究”(16XZX013)
【分類號】：S-09
本文編號：2374713
[Abstract]:Ethical capacity refers to the systematic tolerance of social ethics to various social components in order to maintain social stability. In the system coupling, the society evolves systematically, releases the productive potential, and promotes the social progress. System coupling is incompatible with system concurrency. The former releases the potential of production for the positive value of social progress, whereas the latter is negative for the progress of the system. China's agricultural society is urban-rural dual structure, its system coupling production positive, namely social benefits, most of the strong social urban occupation, is the beneficiary of social development; However, the negative value of the system will be borne by the socially disadvantaged rural areas, and the social development benefits will be very little or no benefit at all. It is the less beneficiary or the aggrieved party of the social development. As a result, cities and villages form the interests of the two opposing sides. In the past, insufficient attention was paid to the social evolution of vulnerable groups, or hindered social development, or developed into a source of social disorder. In the imperial society, the farming civilization managed to maintain the fragile stability of ethical capacity. However, in the post-industrialization era, the social system is developing rapidly, and the coupling of multiple systems and the contradiction of the system coexist, and the social contradiction is far from the original ethical capacity of agricultural civilization. The unfair treatment of Chinese farmers since the Western Zhou Dynasty has caused a series of social problems and seriously hindered social development. Under the current tide of global integration, the social development is unstoppable, the realization of agricultural modernization is inevitable, the corresponding capacity of ethics is bound to be greatly expanded, and the new agricultural ethics has emerged at the dawn.
【作者單位】： 中國草業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究中心草地農業(yè)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)國家重點實驗室農業(yè)部草牧業(yè)創(chuàng)新重點實驗室;蘭州大學哲學社會學院;
【基金】：中國工程院重點咨詢項目“中國草業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究” 2016年國家社科基金西部項目“生態(tài)文明戰(zhàn)略視域中的‘中國農業(yè)倫理學’研究”(16XZX013)
【分類號】：S-09
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前3條
1 李鎮(zhèn)清，，任繼周;能網自組織與生態(tài)系統(tǒng)耦合[J];草業(yè)學報;1995年02期
2 萬里強,李向林;系統(tǒng)耦合及其對農業(yè)系統(tǒng)的作用[J];草業(yè)學報;2002年03期
3 李奇睿;王繼軍;;退耕背景下安塞縣商品型生態(tài)農業(yè)系統(tǒng)耦合關系[J];農業(yè)工程學報;2011年09期
本文編號：2374713
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/nykj/2374713.html
最近更新
教材專著
