基于捐贈(zèng)土壤種子庫(kù)的植被近自然恢復(fù)技術(shù)研究
本文選題:土壤種子庫(kù) + 捐贈(zèng)種子 ; 參考:《河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文
【摘要】:冀北山地沙化程度日益嚴(yán)重,其生態(tài)系統(tǒng)功能的發(fā)揮受到嚴(yán)重制約,植被自然恢復(fù)是提高其生態(tài)系統(tǒng)功能的有效途徑。然而,由于該地區(qū)土壤養(yǎng)分和水分含量低、土壤種子庫(kù)中種子數(shù)量少、物種單一,采用人工造林或封育措施很難實(shí)現(xiàn)植被的自然恢復(fù);诰栀(zèng)土壤種子庫(kù)的植被近自然恢復(fù)技術(shù),是以捐贈(zèng)土壤種子庫(kù)為基礎(chǔ),以提高土壤種子庫(kù)種子發(fā)芽、生長(zhǎng)能力為目的,以天然種子庫(kù)種子收集、種子發(fā)芽與生長(zhǎng)基質(zhì)配比技術(shù),以及發(fā)芽保護(hù)等系列技術(shù)構(gòu)成。該技術(shù)能夠更大程度的利用相似臨近地域的天然種子庫(kù),使植被的更新演替得到有效保證,又可以實(shí)現(xiàn)植被的近自然恢復(fù),確保物種遺傳多樣性。由此可見(jiàn),該技術(shù)可以克服沙化山地土壤種子庫(kù)中種子數(shù)量少、水分、養(yǎng)分不足的缺點(diǎn),從而實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)沙化山地的近自然植被恢復(fù),與人工造林或利用封育措施自然恢復(fù)技術(shù)相比,具有明顯的優(yōu)越性,應(yīng)用前景廣闊。因此,本文以冀北沙化山地為研究對(duì)象,在了解和掌握植被恢復(fù)前沙化山地和捐贈(zèng)土壤種子庫(kù)林地土壤種子庫(kù)特征、土壤理化性質(zhì)及地上植被狀況的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)比較土壤種子庫(kù)土壤不同收集方式的效率和成本,研究種子發(fā)芽基質(zhì)中添加木本植物種子種類和比例、保水劑和土壤粘合劑的施用量及防寒措施的必要性,總結(jié)土壤種子庫(kù)收集技術(shù)、種子發(fā)芽基質(zhì)配比技術(shù)和種子發(fā)芽保護(hù)技術(shù),并利用此技術(shù)對(duì)沙化山地進(jìn)行植被恢復(fù)后的效益進(jìn)行分析,為今后退化山地的植被近自然恢復(fù)提供參考和技術(shù)支持,主要研究結(jié)果如下:1.相對(duì)于人工收集方式,機(jī)械收集土壤種子庫(kù)的效率高、成本低,對(duì)林地土層破壞性小。機(jī)械收集土壤種子庫(kù)的效率為人工收集的8倍,而成本要比人工收集方式低4.8倍。2.添加保水劑后植被生物量和木本植物的數(shù)量均明顯高于未添加保水劑處理,隨著保水劑施用量的增加,植被生物量和木本植物的幼苗數(shù)量顯著增加。當(dāng)保水劑施用量達(dá)到250 kg/m3吸足水的保水劑時(shí),植被生物量和木本植物幼苗的數(shù)量最多,但與施用200 kg/m3保水劑的處理間差異不顯著。表明每m3母土中加入200 Kg吸足水的保水劑就能滿足植物種子萌發(fā)和生長(zhǎng)的需要。3.未經(jīng)任何防寒措施處理的幼苗成活率僅為9.6%,經(jīng)過(guò)覆土的木本植物幼苗成活率為89%,是無(wú)防護(hù)措施的9倍。由此可以說(shuō)明覆土防寒措施的必要性。4.植被恢復(fù)后的造林地土壤種子庫(kù)物種數(shù)量比恢復(fù)前的沙荒地增加11種,以多年生草本植物居多;土壤種子庫(kù)間相似性系數(shù)表現(xiàn)為恢復(fù)后造林地與恢復(fù)前沙荒地相似性系數(shù)為0.32,與捐贈(zèng)土壤種子庫(kù)林地相似性系數(shù)增加到0.44,相似性有所增加。5.恢復(fù)后的地上植被中出現(xiàn)2種常綠喬木及多種灌木樹(shù)種,并增加了豆科植物,多年生草本以及一二年生草本物種數(shù)量增加明顯;地上植被間相似性系數(shù)表現(xiàn)為恢復(fù)后造林地與恢復(fù)前沙荒地相似性系數(shù)為0.30,與捐贈(zèng)土壤種子庫(kù)林地相似性系數(shù)增加到0.54。6.恢復(fù)后的土壤容重達(dá)到良好水平,持水量增加,p H值接近中性,有機(jī)質(zhì)、全N、全P、有效K、堿解N及速效P含量變化趨勢(shì)基本一致,都是在0-10cm土壤深度時(shí)含量較高,隨著土層深度增加含量有所減少,恢復(fù)后造林地較恢復(fù)前沙荒地土壤各種養(yǎng)分含量均顯著提高。
[Abstract]:The degree of desertification in the mountainous region of northern Hebei is becoming more and more serious, and the function of its ecosystem is seriously restricted. The natural restoration of vegetation is an effective way to improve the function of its ecosystem. However, because of the low soil nutrient and water content, the number of seeds in the soil seed bank is low and the species is single, it is difficult to achieve planting by artificial afforestation or seal breeding. The natural restoration technology of the vegetation based on the donated soil seed bank is based on the donation of the soil seed bank, in order to improve the seed germination of the soil seed bank, and to improve the growth ability. It is composed of a series of techniques, such as the seed collection of the natural seed bank, the seed germination and the growth matrix ratio technique, and the germination protection. Using natural seed banks with similar adjacent regions to a greater extent, the renewal and succession of vegetation can be effectively guaranteed, and the near natural restoration of vegetation can be realized, and the genetic diversity of species can be ensured. Thus, this technique can overcome the disadvantages of small number of seeds, water and insufficient nutrients in the sandy soil seed bank of the desertification mountain area, thus realizing the desertification of desertification. The restoration of near natural vegetation in the mountain area has obvious advantages and wide application prospects compared with artificial afforestation or natural restoration techniques using seal breeding measures. Therefore, this paper takes the sandy desertification mountains in northern Hebei as the research object, and understands and grasps the characteristics of the soil seed bank of the sandy land and the donated soil seed bank before the vegetation restoration, and the soil physicochemical properties. On the basis of qualitative and aboveground vegetation conditions, by comparing the efficiency and cost of different soil collection methods in soil seed bank, the species and proportion of seeds added to the seed germination matrix, the application amount of water retention agent and soil binder and the necessity of cold prevention measures were studied, and the collection technology of soil seed bank and the ratio of seed germination matrix were summarized. Technology and seed germination protection techniques are used to analyze the benefits of vegetation restoration in sandy mountain areas, and provide reference and technical support for the near natural restoration of vegetation in degraded mountainous areas. The main results are as follows: 1. relative to artificial collection, mechanical collection of soil seed banks has high efficiency, low cost, and forest land. The soil layer is less destructive. The efficiency of the soil seed bank by mechanical collection is 8 times that of the artificial collection, and the cost of the plant is 4.8 times lower than the artificial collection method. The vegetation biomass and the number of woody plants are significantly higher than that of the non added water preserver. With the increase of the dosage of the water retention agent, the biomass of vegetation and the number of the seedlings of woody plants are increased. There was a significant increase in the amount of vegetation biomass and the number of seedlings of woody plants when the dosage of water retention agent reached 250 kg/m3 of foot water, but the difference was not significant with the treatment of the 200 kg/m3 water retention agent. It was indicated that the addition of 200 Kg absorbent water in each M3 mother soil could satisfy the needs of the plant seed germination and growth of.3.. The survival rate of the seedlings treated with no cold measures was only 9.6%, and the survival rate of the seedlings was 89%, which was 9 times as high as that of the non protective measures. Therefore, it could be explained that the necessity of the soil cold proof measures was necessary. The number of species in the soil seed bank after the restoration of.4. vegetation was increased by 11 species in the sandy land before the restoration, with the majority of perennial herbaceous plants. The similarity coefficient between the soil seed banks showed that the similarity coefficient between the reforestation and the pre recovery sand wasteland was 0.32, and the similarity coefficient increased to 0.44 with the donated soil seed bank, and the similarity increased with 2 evergreen trees and a variety of shrub species in the aboveground vegetation after.5. restoration, and increased the leguminous plants and perennial herbs. The number of one or two year old herbaceous species increased obviously. The similarity coefficient between the aboveground vegetation showed that the similarity coefficient between the reforestation and the pre recovery sand wasteland was 0.30. The similarity coefficient of the soil seed bank forestland increased to a good level after the 0.54.6. recovery, the water holding capacity increased, the p H value was close to neutral, organic matter, All N, all P, effective K, alkali solution N and quick acting P content change trend basically consistent, all is in the 0-10cm soil depth content is higher, with the soil depth increase content decreases somewhat, after recovery, the soil nutrient content of the forested land before recovery is significantly increased.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:S154
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 童秀英,寇建村,楊文權(quán);土壤種子庫(kù)研究現(xiàn)狀[J];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)科技;2005年10期
2 王俊;白瑜;;土壤種子庫(kù)研究的幾個(gè)熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題[J];生態(tài)環(huán)境;2006年06期
3 李寧;馮固;田長(zhǎng)彥;;塔克拉瑪干沙漠北緣土壤種子庫(kù)特征及動(dòng)態(tài)[J];中國(guó)科學(xué).D輯:地球科學(xué);2006年S2期
4 孫紅召;王萌;代莉;;土壤種子庫(kù)的研究進(jìn)展[J];河南林業(yè)科技;2007年02期
5 劉旭;程瑞梅;肖文發(fā);;土壤種子庫(kù)研究進(jìn)展[J];世界林業(yè)研究;2008年01期
6 馮偉;汪小進(jìn);宣力;丁增發(fā);;森林土壤種子庫(kù)研究方法綜述[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2008年09期
7 酒云龍;;土壤種子庫(kù)的研究及其展望[J];山西林業(yè)科技;2008年02期
8 袁莉;周自宗;王震洪;;土壤種子庫(kù)的研究現(xiàn)狀與進(jìn)展綜述[J];生態(tài)科學(xué);2008年03期
9 趙凌平;程積民;萬(wàn)惠娥;;土壤種子庫(kù)研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)水土保持科學(xué);2008年05期
10 李有志;張燦明;林鵬;;土壤種子庫(kù)評(píng)述[J];草業(yè)科學(xué);2009年03期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 李洪遠(yuǎn);;土壤種子庫(kù)在植被恢復(fù)綠化中的應(yīng)用研究[A];加入WTO和中國(guó)科技與可持續(xù)發(fā)展——挑戰(zhàn)與機(jī)遇、責(zé)任和對(duì)策(上冊(cè))[C];2002年
2 王巍;馬克平;高賢明;;土壤種子庫(kù)與植被的關(guān)系[A];生物多樣性與人類未來(lái)——第二屆全國(guó)生物多樣性保護(hù)與持續(xù)利用研討會(huì)論文集[C];1996年
3 吳統(tǒng)貴;吳明;蕭江華;;土壤種子庫(kù)在退化生態(tài)系統(tǒng)恢復(fù)中的作用研究[A];城市生態(tài)建設(shè)與植被恢復(fù)、重建技術(shù)交流研討會(huì)論文集[C];2007年
4 袁玉欣;王穎;;不同土地利用狀況下土壤種子庫(kù)與地表植被變化特征[A];中國(guó)林學(xué)會(huì)2004年年會(huì)論文集[C];2004年
5 沈有信;趙春燕;;中國(guó)近期不同植被類型的土壤種子庫(kù)研究:成就與挑戰(zhàn)[A];中國(guó)植物學(xué)會(huì)七十五周年年會(huì)論文摘要匯編(1933-2008)[C];2008年
6 閆巧玲;劉志民;馬君玲;;科爾沁沙地沙丘土壤種子庫(kù)的時(shí)空格局[A];中國(guó)生態(tài)學(xué)會(huì)2006學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文薈萃[C];2006年
7 邵琪;顧衛(wèi);許映軍;;土壤種子庫(kù)在工程創(chuàng)面生態(tài)恢復(fù)中的應(yīng)用[A];工程綠化理論與技術(shù)進(jìn)展——全國(guó)工程綠化技術(shù)交流研討會(huì)論文集[C];2008年
8 施翔;張道遠(yuǎn);王建成;劉會(huì)良;潘伯榮;;準(zhǔn)噶爾無(wú)葉豆土壤種子庫(kù)特征及其對(duì)種子萌發(fā)的影響[A];第三屆全國(guó)植物生態(tài)學(xué)前沿論壇第三屆全國(guó)克隆植物生態(tài)學(xué)研討會(huì)論文摘要匯編[C];2009年
9 鄭華;歐陽(yáng)志云;王效科;彭廷柏;李振新;趙同謙;李錫泉;;紅壤丘陵區(qū)不同森林恢復(fù)類型土壤種子庫(kù)特征研究[A];生態(tài)學(xué)與全面·協(xié)調(diào)·可持續(xù)發(fā)展——中國(guó)生態(tài)學(xué)會(huì)第七屆全國(guó)會(huì)員代表大會(huì)論文摘要薈萃[C];2004年
10 葉其剛;陳樹(shù)森;;三峽庫(kù)區(qū)異地重返自然瀕危植物群落土壤種子庫(kù)研究[A];第五屆全國(guó)生物多樣性保護(hù)與持續(xù)利用研討會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2002年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 記者 李新龍 通訊員 劉穎;土壤種子庫(kù)研究獲進(jìn)展[N];湖北日?qǐng)?bào);2011年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 趙凌平;黃土高原土壤種子庫(kù)與植被恢復(fù)研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2011年
2 王國(guó)棟;農(nóng)業(yè)活動(dòng)對(duì)三江平原濕地土壤種子庫(kù)的影響研究[D];中國(guó)科學(xué)院研究生院(東北地理與農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)研究所);2014年
3 尚占環(huán);江河源區(qū)退化高寒草地土壤種子庫(kù)及其植被更新[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 張濤;干旱礦區(qū)廢棄地土壤種子庫(kù)特征研究[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2009年
2 黃紅慧;巖溶區(qū)不同地球化學(xué)背景下的土壤種子庫(kù)研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2007年
3 陳云龍;古爾班通古特沙漠三種立地類型梭梭土壤種子庫(kù)研究[D];石河子大學(xué);2015年
4 桑潮;高寒草地退化與圍欄封育對(duì)土壤種子庫(kù)及其與地上植被關(guān)系的影響[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年
5 賀夢(mèng)璇;基質(zhì)添加對(duì)土壤種子庫(kù)特征的影響研究[D];南開(kāi)大學(xué);2015年
6 邢旭明;古爾班通古特沙漠生物土壤結(jié)皮對(duì)土壤種子庫(kù)多樣性與分布特征的影響[D];新疆師范大學(xué);2016年
7 伏凱;北京山區(qū)自然邊坡土壤種子庫(kù)特征研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2016年
8 霍麗娟;黃土丘陵區(qū)天然草地土壤種子庫(kù)萌發(fā)對(duì)水氮條件的響應(yīng)[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2016年
9 力志;天鵝洲退化濕地土壤種子庫(kù)的特征及其在不同水分條件下的群落更新研究[D];中國(guó)科學(xué)院研究生院(武漢植物園);2016年
10 張淼;三峽庫(kù)區(qū)消落帶土壤種子庫(kù)的形成特征及其對(duì)植被恢復(fù)的作用[D];三峽大學(xué);2016年
,本文編號(hào):1969063
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/nykj/1969063.html