本文選題：農(nóng)業(yè)水價 + 節(jié)水補償�。� 參考：《西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：針對目前我國農(nóng)業(yè)水價嚴重偏低,無法有效促進農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水的情況,分析農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格的提高對農(nóng)業(yè)用水的影響,為合理制定水價提供依據(jù)�？紤]到農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶的水價承受能力和國家糧食安全,提高農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格的同時應(yīng)輔以農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)用水補償,即結(jié)合政府補貼、水權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓費及虛擬水補償費對灌區(qū)進行綜合補償。采用雙層規(guī)劃方法,以灌區(qū)管理單位收益和各用水戶收益最大為模型的上、下層優(yōu)化目標,建立雙層優(yōu)化模型。討論農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格改革和農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)用水補償對促進農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水的可行性,利用罰函數(shù)法優(yōu)化農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格及與其相對應(yīng)的補償標準。在此基礎(chǔ)上,以河套灌區(qū)2012年各部門用水數(shù)據(jù)和收益情況為例來檢驗農(nóng)業(yè)水價定價與生產(chǎn)用水補償耦合模型的應(yīng)用效果。獲得的主要結(jié)果如下:(1)合理提高農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格有利于促進農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶自發(fā)節(jié)水。通過分析我國目前水資源壓力和農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水困境的原因,指出農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格過低,往往會導(dǎo)致農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶節(jié)水意識淡薄,農(nóng)業(yè)灌溉用水浪費嚴重。合理提高農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格,農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶取水量隨著農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格的提高而減少,有利于促進農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水。(2)綜合考慮灌區(qū)節(jié)水各參與方利益,應(yīng)對農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)用水進行補償。從農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶的利益角度分析了農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶節(jié)水積極性差的主要原因,單純發(fā)展農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水會出現(xiàn)“負效益”現(xiàn)象;從灌區(qū)管理單位角度來說,農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水造成管理單位所收水費下降而不愿節(jié)水。提出在提高農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格促進農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水的情況下,應(yīng)結(jié)合政府補貼、農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水投入、水權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓費及虛擬水補償費對灌區(qū)進行綜合補償。調(diào)節(jié)補償分配的比例和額度,在有利于國家總體利益的情形下,實現(xiàn)灌區(qū)節(jié)水主體通過節(jié)水實現(xiàn)雙方共贏的局面。(3)建立了農(nóng)業(yè)水價定價和農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)用水補償?shù)鸟詈夏Ｐ�。農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格改革有利于促進灌區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水,但價格提高會提高農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)成本,傷害農(nóng)戶利益威脅農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn);采用補償措施,能夠在農(nóng)戶發(fā)展節(jié)水的情況下,不增加農(nóng)戶用水的成本,甚至可能出現(xiàn)節(jié)水后收入增加的情況。建立了農(nóng)業(yè)水價定價和生產(chǎn)用水補償耦合模型,模型中農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶和灌區(qū)管理單位共同作為受償主體,通過農(nóng)產(chǎn)品輸出和水權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓獲得收益。同時,灌區(qū)管理單位和農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶之間也存在博弈的過程,水權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓、虛擬水補償和灌區(qū)節(jié)水投入均需要二者共同參與,投入和收益的分攤比例是二者博弈的主要內(nèi)容。(4)河套灌區(qū)案例分析表明,優(yōu)化后灌區(qū)管理單位、農(nóng)業(yè)、工業(yè)和生活用水戶收益均能得到一定提高。對河套灌區(qū)2012年各部門生產(chǎn)用水、作物產(chǎn)量、社會經(jīng)濟等方面進行優(yōu)化。優(yōu)化顯示2012年河套灌區(qū)最優(yōu)農(nóng)業(yè)用水價格為0.65元/m3,農(nóng)業(yè)節(jié)水量也就是水市場中水權(quán)交易量為1.2億m3,轉(zhuǎn)讓給工業(yè)和生活用水戶的水權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓價格為3.3元/m3,對農(nóng)業(yè)用水戶的節(jié)水補償為4.65元/m3。優(yōu)化后,灌區(qū)管理單位,農(nóng)業(yè)、工業(yè)和生活用水戶收益均得到提高,實現(xiàn)了社會整體利益的增加。
[Abstract]:In view of the serious low agricultural water price in our country, we can not effectively promote the agricultural water saving, analyze the influence of the increase of agricultural water price on the agricultural water use, and provide the basis for the rational water price. Considering the water price bearing capacity of the agricultural users and the national food security, the agricultural water price should be supplemented with agricultural production. Water compensation, that is, combined with government subsidy, water rights transfer fee and virtual water compensation fee to make comprehensive compensation for irrigation area, the double layer optimization model is established by using the double layer planning method, which takes the income of irrigation district management unit and the maximum income of each water user as the model, and establishes a double layer optimization model. A penalty function method is used to optimize the agricultural water price and its corresponding compensation standard. Based on this, the results of the coupling model of agricultural water price pricing and production water compensation are tested on this basis. The main results are as follows: (1) the main results are as follows: (1) the results are as follows: Raising the price of agricultural water use helps to promote the spontaneous water saving of agricultural water users. Through the analysis of the current water resources pressure and the reasons for the difficulties of agricultural water saving, it is pointed out that the low price of agricultural water use often leads to the weak water saving consciousness of the agricultural users and the serious waste of agricultural irrigation water. The water quantity decreases with the increase of agricultural water price and helps to promote the agricultural water saving. (2) considering the interests of all the participants in the irrigation area, we should compensate the water for agricultural production. From the angle of the agricultural water users, the main reasons for the poor enthusiasm of the agricultural water users are analyzed, and the "negative benefits" will appear in the simple development of agricultural water saving. From the point of view of the management unit of the irrigation district, the water saving of the management unit caused by the agricultural water saving is not willing to save water. In the case of raising the price of agricultural water to promote the agricultural water saving, it should be combined with the government subsidies, agricultural water saving investment, water rights transfer fee and virtual water compensation fee to make comprehensive compensation to the irrigation area. In the case of the overall interests of the country, in the case of the overall interests of the country, the water-saving main body of the irrigation area can realize the win-win situation of both sides through water saving. (3) the coupling model of agricultural water price pricing and agricultural production water compensation is established. The reform of agricultural water price is beneficial to the promotion of agricultural water saving in irrigation area, but the increase in price will increase the cost of agricultural production and injury. The farmers' interests threaten the agricultural production, and the compensation measures can not increase the cost of the farmers' water use and even increase the income after the water saving. The coupling model of the agricultural water price pricing and the production water compensation is established, and the agricultural water users and the irrigation district management units are paid together as compensation in the model. The main body, through the output of agricultural products and the transfer of water rights to obtain income. At the same time, there is a game between the irrigation district management unit and the agricultural water users. Water rights transfer, virtual water compensation and irrigation area water saving input are all two parties involved. The proportion of investment and income sharing is the main content of the two party game. (4) the case analysis of the Hetao Irrigation Area The optimized irrigation area management unit, agricultural, industrial and household income can be improved to a certain extent. The production water, crop yield and social economy in Hetao Irrigation Area in 2012 were optimized. The optimal agricultural water price in the Hetao Irrigation Area in 2012 was 0.65 yuan /m3, and the agricultural water saving amount was the water right in the water market. The easy amount is 120 million m3, the transfer price of water right transfer to industrial and living water users is 3.3 yuan /m3, and the water saving compensation for agricultural water users is 4.65 yuan /m3., the irrigation district management unit, agricultural, industrial and living water users' income are all improved, and the social overall interest is increased.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F323.213;F726

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇永新;甘肅中部地區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)水價與用水量分析[J];甘肅水利水電技術(shù);2003年03期

2 木子;震宇;;農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革研討班在西安舉辦[J];價格與市場;2011年06期

3 云育兵;;推進農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革座談會在成都召開[J];價格與市場;2013年04期

4 ;河南省2013年度農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革示范工作全面展開[J];河南水利與南水北調(diào);2013年17期

5 劉艷陽;秦永霞;任永紅;;農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革探討[J];內(nèi)蒙古水利;2013年04期

6 王健宇;;對深化農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革的對策建議[J];水利發(fā)展研究;2013年10期

7 劉斌;論農(nóng)業(yè)水價[J];價格月刊;1999年08期

8 ;水利部:進步推進農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革[J];農(nóng)村工作通訊;2014年04期

9 姜文來;農(nóng)業(yè)水價承載力研究[J];中國水利;2003年11期

10 ;農(nóng)業(yè)水價將逐步調(diào)整[J];中國農(nóng)村小康科技;2003年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前4條

1 馬東春;;北京農(nóng)業(yè)水價政府管理與公共政策研究[A];中國水利學(xué)會2010學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集（上冊）[C];2010年

2 楊斌;閆樺;;基于粗糙集理論的農(nóng)業(yè)水價承受能力研究[A];第十一屆中國管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2009年

3 李德信;劉元廣;魯海娟;;建立農(nóng)業(yè)水價補償機制,促進灌溉事業(yè)良性發(fā)展[A];中國水利學(xué)會2010學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集（上冊）[C];2010年

4 藺曉明;;對灌區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)水價現(xiàn)狀的分析與思考[A];中國水利學(xué)會2010學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集（上冊）[C];2010年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 王宋平　通訊員 劉喜芬;我市農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革步步推進[N];張家口日報;2013年

2 記者 歐陽光;四川：積極推進農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革[N];中國水利報;2008年

3 鄒渠;我省啟動農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革[N];四川日報;2008年

4 記者 陳銳;扎實推進農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革試點[N];中國水利報;2008年

5 馮金蓮;我市大力推進灌區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革[N];石家莊日報;2008年

6 記者 陳銳;水利部總結(jié)農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革試點工作[N];中國水利報;2008年

7 記者 柳德新;農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革試點順利[N];湖南日報;2009年

8 嚴婷婷 賈紹鳳 劉希勝 中國科學(xué)院地理科學(xué)與資源研究所;提高農(nóng)業(yè)水價承受能力的建議[N];中國水利報;2010年

9 記者 薄燕妮 通訊員 劉璇;樹林子村農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革節(jié)水改造試點項目進展順利[N];巴彥淖爾日報(漢);2010年

10 邵遠亮 任小靜 湖北省水利廳;湖北省農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革調(diào)查[N];人民長江報;2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王建平;內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)水價研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 景金勇;德州市現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)水價節(jié)水補償激勵機制研究[D];山東理工大學(xué);2015年

2 蔡舒晨;基于非線性農(nóng)業(yè)水價模型的高郵市農(nóng)業(yè)灌溉用水水價研究[D];揚州大學(xué);2016年

3 王宏燁;農(nóng)業(yè)水價綜合改革對農(nóng)戶節(jié)水意愿的影響研究[D];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2017年

4 李鵬;可持續(xù)發(fā)展的農(nóng)業(yè)水價理論與改革[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2008年

5 田元君;山東省引黃灌區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)水價研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

6 趙曉坤;內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)節(jié)水農(nóng)業(yè)水價問題研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2002年

，

本文編號：1915570