磷添加和非農(nóng)植物多樣性對(duì)土壤線蟲(chóng)群落的影響
本文選題:土壤線蟲(chóng) + 施肥。 參考:《河南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文
【摘要】:隨著我國(guó)人口不斷的增加和人們對(duì)糧食的需求越來(lái)越大,提高土壤肥力和防治農(nóng)田雜草是增加農(nóng)作物產(chǎn)量至關(guān)重要途徑。磷肥是農(nóng)作物生長(zhǎng)的必要元素之一,近年來(lái)農(nóng)田磷肥施用量迅速增加。因此,施磷肥和除草引起的植物多樣性下降對(duì)土壤健康的影響,成為生態(tài)學(xué)研究的重要課題。土壤線蟲(chóng)作為土壤中數(shù)量和物種多樣性最多的無(wú)脊椎動(dòng)物之一,是土壤生物群落重要組成部分,而且線蟲(chóng)動(dòng)物區(qū)系能夠?qū)ι镞M(jìn)程提供獨(dú)特的評(píng)價(jià)。因此,線蟲(chóng)被認(rèn)為是鑒定土壤質(zhì)量的指示生物。本研究采用盆栽模擬實(shí)驗(yàn),設(shè)施肥和非農(nóng)植物多樣性雙因素處理。磷肥作為第一個(gè)因子,分為不施磷肥(P-)和添加磷肥(P+),每個(gè)施肥處理設(shè)36個(gè)重復(fù);非農(nóng)植物多樣性作為第二個(gè)因子,處理分為4個(gè)部分,包括無(wú)非農(nóng)植物(NW),1種非農(nóng)植物(OW),2種非農(nóng)植物(TW)和4種非農(nóng)植物(FW)共4個(gè)處理。于冬小麥孕穗期取樣,土壤線蟲(chóng)采用貝爾曼濕漏斗法提取,鑒定到屬;谕寥谰蟲(chóng)的多度、豐度、營(yíng)養(yǎng)類群、功能團(tuán)指數(shù)、生態(tài)指數(shù)以及線蟲(chóng)動(dòng)物區(qū)系分析數(shù)據(jù),用來(lái)評(píng)估磷添加和非農(nóng)植物多樣性對(duì)冬小麥孕穗期土壤線蟲(chóng)群落構(gòu)成的影響及作用機(jī)制,闡明磷添加和非農(nóng)植物多樣性下土壤線蟲(chóng)群落結(jié)構(gòu)的趨勢(shì)變化。得出以下主要結(jié)果:1、群落構(gòu)成:冬小麥孕穗期,共分離鑒定28592頭線蟲(chóng),2個(gè)綱,7個(gè)目,16個(gè)科,30個(gè)屬,其中食細(xì)菌線蟲(chóng)13417頭、11個(gè)屬,食真菌線蟲(chóng)1680頭、2個(gè)屬,植食性線蟲(chóng)11128頭、10個(gè)屬,雜捕性線蟲(chóng)2364頭、7個(gè)屬,優(yōu)勢(shì)類群為小桿屬(18%)、短體屬(17%)和矮化屬(10%)。磷添加和非農(nóng)植物多樣性處理中,P+多度值大于P-,在P+種植TW非農(nóng)植物和P-種植NW非農(nóng)植物時(shí)線蟲(chóng)多度值最高。P添加土壤線蟲(chóng)總多度(F=12.513,P=0.001)顯著增加,總豐度(F=14.837,P=0.000)顯著增加,P+對(duì)比P-處理中,多度增幅為0.574;豐度增加值為2.167;非農(nóng)植物多樣性土壤線蟲(chóng)總多度(F=0.273,P=0.845)和總豐度(F=2.346,P=0.081)均沒(méi)有出現(xiàn)顯著性。P添加和非農(nóng)植物多樣性交互土壤線蟲(chóng)總多度(F=0.210,P=0.889)和總豐度(F=1.325,P=0.274)均沒(méi)表現(xiàn)出顯著性。2、生態(tài)參數(shù):P+的處理中,線蟲(chóng)生態(tài)指數(shù)雜比植、香農(nóng)多樣性指數(shù)、均勻度指數(shù)、豐富度指數(shù)、自由生活線蟲(chóng)成熟度指數(shù)的值均隨非農(nóng)植物多樣性的增加而增高,且種植NW和FW非農(nóng)植物時(shí),香農(nóng)多樣性指數(shù)、均勻度指數(shù)出現(xiàn)顯著性差異。P-處理中,線蟲(chóng)生態(tài)指數(shù)雜比植、香農(nóng)多樣性指數(shù)、豐富度指數(shù)、自由生活線蟲(chóng)成熟度指數(shù),相對(duì)于其它3種非農(nóng)植物多樣性的處理中,種植TW非農(nóng)植物的值最高,且豐富度指數(shù)出現(xiàn)了顯著性差異。雙因素方差分析表明,線蟲(chóng)總數(shù)和營(yíng)養(yǎng)類群中食細(xì)菌線蟲(chóng)多度、植食性線蟲(chóng)多度以及功能團(tuán)指數(shù)中Ba1、Fu2、Pp5、OP5在施肥處理作用中均有顯著性,但P+和非農(nóng)植物多樣性交互方差分析中均沒(méi)有出現(xiàn)顯著性。線蟲(chóng)區(qū)系分析結(jié)果表明,P+處理和非農(nóng)植物多樣性交互下富集指數(shù)和結(jié)構(gòu)指數(shù)均在50-100之間變化,位于B象限,表明該土壤中所含養(yǎng)分量較高,并且受到外界干擾程度較小,表明食物網(wǎng)處于穩(wěn)定成熟階段。3、土壤理化性質(zhì)與土壤線蟲(chóng)相關(guān)、回歸分析結(jié)果顯示:土壤有機(jī)碳與線蟲(chóng)總數(shù)(R2=0.293,P0.001)、食細(xì)菌線蟲(chóng)多度(R2=0.259,P0.001)、植食性線蟲(chóng)多度(R2=0.272,P0.001)、植食性功能團(tuán)cp=5的值(R2=0.259,P0.001)、富集指數(shù)(R2=0.134,P0.001)均顯著正相關(guān);但與自由生活線蟲(chóng)成熟度指數(shù)(R2=0.159,P0.001)、通道指數(shù)(R2=0.130,P0.001)呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān)。速效磷與線蟲(chóng)總數(shù)(R2=0.180,P0.001)、食細(xì)菌線蟲(chóng)多度(R2=0.222,P0.001)、植食性線蟲(chóng)多度(R2=0.148,P0.001)、富集指數(shù)(R2=0.151,P0.001)均呈顯著正相關(guān);與總線蟲(chóng)豐度(R2=0.122,P0.05)、自由生活線蟲(chóng)成熟度指數(shù)(R2=0.152,P0.001)、結(jié)構(gòu)指數(shù)(R2=0.122,P0.05)、通道指數(shù)(R2=0.155,P0.001)呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān)。銨態(tài)氮與結(jié)構(gòu)指數(shù)(R2=0.087,P0.05)、通道指數(shù)(R2=0.130,P0.05)呈顯著正相關(guān);但與線蟲(chóng)總數(shù)(R2=0.145,P0.05)、食細(xì)菌線蟲(chóng)多度(R2=0.167,P0.001)、植食性線蟲(chóng)多度(R2=0.125,P0.05)、總線蟲(chóng)豐度(R2=0.160,P0.001)、均勻度指數(shù)(R2=0.041,P0.05)、富集指數(shù)(R2=0.153,P0.001)均顯著負(fù)相關(guān)。綜上所述,施磷肥能增加土壤養(yǎng)分和土壤線蟲(chóng)多度,改變土壤線蟲(chóng)對(duì)有機(jī)質(zhì)分解途徑,減少稀有種類。通過(guò)增加非農(nóng)植物多樣性能夠減緩施肥對(duì)土壤線蟲(chóng)群落的負(fù)面效應(yīng),提高了食物網(wǎng)的復(fù)雜程度。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果能夠?yàn)檗r(nóng)田施肥和除草措施制定、農(nóng)田生物多樣性保護(hù)和農(nóng)田土壤健康發(fā)展提理論基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:With the increasing population of our country and the increasing demand for grain, improving soil fertility and controlling weeds is an important way to increase crop yield. Phosphate fertilizer is one of the essential elements of crop growth. In recent years, the amount of phosphate fertilizer applied in farmland has increased rapidly. Therefore, the plant diversity caused by phosphate fertilizer and weed removal has decreased. Soil nematode, one of the most important species of invertebrates in soil and species diversity, is an important part of the soil community, and the nematode fauna can provide a unique assessment of biological processes. Indicator organisms. This study uses a potted plant simulation experiment, a dual factor treatment of plant fertilizer and non-agricultural plant diversity. As the first factor, phosphate fertilizer is divided into no phosphate fertilizer (P-) and phosphate fertilizer (P+), each fertilization treatment is set up 36 repetitions; non agricultural plant diversity is divided into 4 parts, including no non - non - non - agricultural plant (NW), and 1 kinds of non - agricultural plants. 2 nonagricultural plants (OW), 2 nonagricultural plants (TW) and 4 non-agricultural plants (FW) were treated. The soil nematode was extracted by Behrman wet leakage method and identified in the booting stage of winter wheat. The influence and mechanism of agro plant diversity on the composition of soil nematode community at the booting stage of winter wheat, and clarified the trend of soil nematode community structure under the addition of phosphorus and non agro plant diversity. The following main results were as follows: 1, the community composition: 28592 nematodes, 2 classes, 7 orders, 16 families and 30 genera were isolated and identified in the booting stage of winter wheat. 13417 heads, 11 genera, 1680 heads and 2 genera of nematode, 11128, 10, 2364, 7 genus of phytophagous nematodes, the dominant group of 7 genera, the dominant group of small genus (18%), the short body (17%) and the dwarf (10%). The P+ value is greater than the P-, and the TW non-agricultural plants and the P- plant NW non-agricultural plants in P+. The highest.P added to the nematode abundance (F=12.513, P=0.001) increased significantly, and the total abundance (F=14.837, P=0.000) increased significantly. In the P+ contrast P- treatment, the increase was 0.574 and the abundance was 2.167; the total abundance (F=0.273, P=0.845) and the total abundance (F=2.346, P=0.081) of the non-agricultural diversity soil nematodes were not present. The total abundance (F=0.210, P=0.889) and total abundance (F=1.325, P=0.274) of the significant.P addition and non agricultural intercourse nematode diversity (F=1.325, P=0.274) did not show significant.2. The ecological parameters: the ecological index heterozygosity of the nematode, the Shannon diversity index, the evenness index, the richness index, and the value of the maturity index of free living nematode all follow the non The increase of agricultural plant diversity increased, and when NW and FW non-agricultural plants were planted, the Shannon diversity index and the evenness index showed significant difference in.P- treatment, the nematode ecological index heterozygosity, the Shannon diversity index, the richness index, the free living nematode maturity index, compared with the other 3 non-agricultural plant diversity. The value of TW non-agricultural plants was the highest and the richness index showed significant differences. Two factor variance analysis showed that the number of nematodes, the abundance of nematode eating nematodes, the abundance of herbivorous nematodes, and the Ba1, Fu2, Pp5, and OP5 in the functional group index were significant in the fertilization treatment, but the diversity intercourse variance analysis between P+ and non-agricultural plants was analyzed. The results showed that the mutual enrichment index and structure index of P+ treatment and non agricultural intercourse varied between 50-100 and B quadrants, indicating that the nutrient components in the soil were higher and were less disturbed by the outside world, indicating that the food network was in a stable and mature stage of.3 and soil physicochemical. The properties of soil nematode were related to soil nematode. The results of regression analysis showed that soil organic carbon and total R2=0.293 (P0.001), R2=0.259 (P0.001), R2=0.272, P0.001, R2=0.259, P0.001 (R2=0.134, P0.001) were both significant positive correlation, but with free living nematodes, but with free living nematodes. The R2=0.159 (P0.001) and the R2=0.130 (P0.001) showed significant negative correlation. The available phosphorus and the total number of nematodes (R2=0.180, P0.001), the abundance of the nematode eating nematode (R2=0.222, P0.001), the abundance of herbivorous nematodes (R2=0.148, P0.001), and the enrichment index (R2=0.151, P0.001) were all significant positive correlation. The nematode maturity index (R2=0.152, P0.001), structure index (R2=0.122, P0.05), channel index (R2=0.155, P0.001) showed significant negative correlation. The ammonium nitrogen and structural index (R2=0.087, P0.05), channel index (R2=0.130, P0.05) showed significant positive correlation, but with the total number of nematodes (R2=0.145, P0.05), bacterial nematode abundance, and phytophagous nematode abundance. (R2=0.125, P0.05), R2=0.160 (P0.001), evenness index (R2=0.041, P0.05), enrichment index (R2=0.153, P0.001) are all significantly negative correlation. In summary, phosphate fertilizer can increase soil nutrients and soil nematode abundance, change soil nematode to the organic decomposition pathway, reduce rare species. By increasing non-agricultural diversity can be reduced. The negative effects of slow fertilization on soil nematode community increased the complexity of the food network. The experimental results could provide a theoretical basis for farmland fertilization and weed control measures, the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the healthy development of farmland soil.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:S154.386
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 華建峰;姜勇;梁文舉;;植被覆蓋對(duì)土壤線蟲(chóng)營(yíng)養(yǎng)類群空間分布的影響[J];應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期
2 吳東輝;張柏;陳鵬;;長(zhǎng)春市不同土地利用生境的土壤線蟲(chóng)群落結(jié)構(gòu)特征[J];應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期
3 毛小芳;胡鋒;陳小云;Griffiths Bryan;李輝信;;土壤食細(xì)菌線蟲(chóng)的原位富集培養(yǎng)方法[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期
4 邵元虎;傅聲雷;;試論土壤線蟲(chóng)多樣性在生態(tài)系統(tǒng)中的作用[J];生物多樣性;2007年02期
5 阮維斌;吳建波;張欣;李晶;許華;趙念席;陳磊;段玉璽;陳立潔;高玉葆;;內(nèi)蒙古中東部大針茅群落土壤線蟲(chóng)多樣性研究[J];應(yīng)用與環(huán)境生物學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
6 周際海;陶軍;陳小云;胡鋒;李輝信;;安徽農(nóng)藥廠廠區(qū)及周邊農(nóng)田土壤線蟲(chóng)數(shù)量特征[J];生物多樣性;2008年06期
7 劉艷軍;張喜林;高中超;劉穎;馬星竹;周寶庫(kù);;長(zhǎng)期施肥對(duì)土壤線蟲(chóng)群落結(jié)構(gòu)的影響[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2011年21期
8 劉貝貝;葉成龍;虞麗;焦加國(guó);劉滿強(qiáng);胡鋒;李輝信;;不同植被類型的灘涂濕地土壤線蟲(chóng)群落特征[J];應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2012年11期
9 林琳;王琳;張雪萍;李景科;;不同施肥處理方式下土壤線蟲(chóng)群落結(jié)構(gòu)的研究[J];國(guó)土與自然資源研究;2013年03期
10 韓志泉;;土壤線蟲(chóng)與人類關(guān)系[J];生物學(xué)通報(bào);1992年09期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 梁文舉;李琪;姜勇;;農(nóng)田土壤線蟲(chóng)多樣性研究進(jìn)展[A];中國(guó)生態(tài)學(xué)會(huì)2006學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文薈萃[C];2006年
2 吳紀(jì)華;陳慧麗;;外來(lái)植物互花米草對(duì)土壤線蟲(chóng)群落的影響及其機(jī)制[A];第四次全國(guó)土壤生物和生物化學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2007年
3 陳國(guó)康;陳讓;朱致豫;肖崇剛;;重慶煙草根際土壤線蟲(chóng)及其群落結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)查分析[A];中國(guó)植物病理學(xué)會(huì)2012年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前7條
1 胡靖;青藏高原東緣高寒草甸土壤線蟲(chóng)群落對(duì)施肥和放牧的響應(yīng)研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年
2 李玉娟;云南哀牢山土壤線蟲(chóng)對(duì)植物群落改變及地上/地下資源輸入的響應(yīng)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年
3 李輝信;土壤線蟲(chóng)對(duì)養(yǎng)分循環(huán)和作物生長(zhǎng)的影響及機(jī)理[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);1998年
4 劉艷斌;南疆果糧間作系統(tǒng)土壤線蟲(chóng)群落結(jié)構(gòu)特征及與土壤食物網(wǎng)的關(guān)系[D];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年
5 侯雪坤;不同耕作方式下土壤耕層理化性狀和生物學(xué)特性時(shí)空分布研究[D];黑龍江八一農(nóng)墾大學(xué);2011年
6 董錫文;科爾沁沙地沙丘植物恢復(fù)進(jìn)程中土壤肥力變化及線蟲(chóng)群落空間分布特征研究[D];沈陽(yáng)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年
7 支德娟;沙坡頭人工固沙區(qū)線蟲(chóng)群落對(duì)其棲居環(huán)境指示作用研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 劉志典;土壤線蟲(chóng)培養(yǎng)方法與毒性試驗(yàn)研究[D];沈陽(yáng)大學(xué);2013年
2 王靜;施肥對(duì)青藏高原東部高寒草甸土壤線蟲(chóng)群落組成的影響[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年
3 李烏日吉木斯;不同放牧強(qiáng)度對(duì)典型草原土壤線蟲(chóng)群落的影響[D];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年
4 李懋;田間模擬條件下氣候變化對(duì)農(nóng)田土壤線蟲(chóng)群落結(jié)構(gòu)和酶活性的影響[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年
5 陳思宇;磷添加和非農(nóng)植物多樣性對(duì)土壤線蟲(chóng)群落的影響[D];河南大學(xué);2015年
6 凌斌;云南省高黎貢山土壤線蟲(chóng)群落結(jié)構(gòu)及多樣性研究[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2008年
7 寶音溫都蘇;不同種植模式下苜蓿地土壤線蟲(chóng)群落結(jié)構(gòu)的變化[D];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年
8 劉貝貝;江蘇省幾種不同土地利用方式下土壤線蟲(chóng)的群落特征研究[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年
9 谷旭;遼東半島海岸帶不同植被類型中土壤線蟲(chóng)群落特征[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2013年
10 王可洪;三江平原濕地墾殖過(guò)程中農(nóng)藥對(duì)土壤線蟲(chóng)多樣性的影響[D];中國(guó)科學(xué)院研究生院(東北地理與農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)研究所);2014年
,本文編號(hào):1818631
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/nykj/1818631.html