本文選題：層次分析法 + 逼近理想解排序法　； 參考：《金屬礦山》2017年01期

【摘要】：針對(duì)目前"經(jīng)驗(yàn)類比法"確定采礦方法過分依賴采礦人員的經(jīng)驗(yàn),無法定量分析等問題,以四方金礦為工程背景,利用層次分析法(AHP)和逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)建立AHP-TOPSIS采礦方法優(yōu)選模型,對(duì)初選的4種采礦方法進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)判,4種采礦方法與理想解的貼進(jìn)度分別為0.266,0.479,0.421,0.533,確定第4種采礦方法(無底柱分段崩落法)最優(yōu)。評(píng)判結(jié)果與礦山目前采用的采礦方法一致,表明AHP-TOPSIS采礦方法優(yōu)選模型能有效地用于工程實(shí)踐,同時(shí)也表明無底柱分段崩落法開采高價(jià)值礦種也是合適的,拓展了此采礦方法的運(yùn)用范圍。
[Abstract]:In view of the problems of "experience analogy" in determining the mining method relying too much on the experience of the miners and not in quantitative analysis, the paper takes Sifang Gold Mine as the engineering background. The optimal selection model of AHP-TOPSIS mining method is established by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and approximate ideal solution ranking method (TopSISs). This paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of the four primary mining methods and the attachment progress of the four mining methods and the ideal solution are 0.266g / 0.479 / 0.421/ 0.533, respectively. It is determined that the fourth mining method (sublevel caving method without bottom pillar) is the best. The result of evaluation is consistent with the mining method used at present, which shows that the optimal selection model of AHP-TOPSIS mining method can be used effectively in engineering practice, and that the sublevel caving method without bottom pillar is also suitable for mining high value minerals. The range of application of this mining method is expanded.
【作者單位】： 西安建筑科技大學(xué)材料與礦資學(xué)院;紫金礦業(yè)集團(tuán)股份有限公司;
【分類號(hào)】：TD863

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王新民;秦健春;張欽禮;陳五九;陳憲龍;;基于AHP-TOPSIS評(píng)判模型的姑山駐留礦采礦方法優(yōu)選[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2013年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 常穎;基于AHP-TOPSIS的Z物流公司核心競爭力評(píng)價(jià)及提升策略[D];華南理工大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1989816