本文關(guān)鍵詞： 鋼絲繩 金相實(shí)驗(yàn) 檢測(cè)實(shí)驗(yàn) 斷絲 信號(hào)分析　出處：《江西理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：由于鋼絲繩具有強(qiáng)度高、彈性好、自重輕及撓性好等優(yōu)點(diǎn),被廣泛的應(yīng)用于煤炭、冶金、石油、建筑、機(jī)械制造、交通運(yùn)輸、林業(yè),港口等行業(yè)。一直以來,因鋼絲繩斷絲而引發(fā)的事故頻頻發(fā)生,究其原因是現(xiàn)階段市場(chǎng)上尚缺乏有力可靠的檢測(cè)手段,人們無法掌握鋼絲繩的損傷程度與檢測(cè)信號(hào)之間的確切關(guān)系,因而無法確定在役鋼絲繩的損傷與剩余強(qiáng)度的定量關(guān)系。因此,采用可靠的檢測(cè)設(shè)備對(duì)鋼絲繩的損傷程度進(jìn)行檢測(cè),有效地提取檢測(cè)信號(hào),深入分析檢測(cè)信號(hào)特征,為定量確定鋼絲繩損傷與剩余強(qiáng)度的關(guān)系提供可靠的依據(jù)已經(jīng)顯得尤為重要。本文利用光譜儀和金相顯微鏡對(duì)72A、82B、304、316鋼絲進(jìn)行了光譜實(shí)驗(yàn)和金相實(shí)驗(yàn),得到了它們的化學(xué)成分,觀察了金相組織形貌、晶粒種類等。分析了這四種鋼絲的化學(xué)成分、金相組織與其強(qiáng)度、塑性、韌性等性能的關(guān)系,并對(duì)四種鋼絲性能的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了比較,得到結(jié)論:72A和82B鋼絲在強(qiáng)度和組織性能上較304和316更適合作為制作鋼絲繩的材料。依據(jù)漏磁原理,利用從波蘭進(jìn)口的MD120B鋼絲繩探傷儀器進(jìn)行模擬實(shí)驗(yàn),對(duì)72A鋼絲繩不同的斷絲損傷進(jìn)行檢測(cè)。提取檢測(cè)信號(hào),分析檢測(cè)信號(hào)的波峰、波寬與不同斷絲數(shù)目、不同斷絲間距、不同鋼絲直徑等斷絲損傷參數(shù)之間的關(guān)系。通過對(duì)檢測(cè)信號(hào)的數(shù)據(jù)整理和分析,得到了檢測(cè)信號(hào)波峰、波寬與斷絲數(shù)目、斷絲間距、鋼絲直徑等鋼絲繩斷絲損傷參數(shù)之間的關(guān)系曲線。鋼絲繩檢測(cè)要從多方位對(duì)鋼絲繩進(jìn)行全面損傷檢測(cè),本文主要研究了鋼絲繩的斷絲損傷檢測(cè)信號(hào)與其斷絲損傷參數(shù)之間的關(guān)系,為實(shí)現(xiàn)鋼絲繩在役檢測(cè)提供數(shù)據(jù)支撐,同時(shí)為定量判斷鋼絲繩損傷與剩余強(qiáng)度的關(guān)系提供參考依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Because of its advantages of high strength, good elasticity, light weight and good flexibility, steel wire rope has been widely used in coal, metallurgy, petroleum, construction, machinery manufacturing, transportation, forestry, port and other industries. Accidents caused by wire rope breaking occur frequently. The reason is that there is still a lack of strong and reliable detection means in the market at present. People can not grasp the exact relationship between the damage degree of wire rope and the detection signal. Therefore, it is impossible to determine the quantitative relationship between the damage and the residual strength of the wire rope in service. Therefore, the damage degree of the wire rope is detected by reliable testing equipment, and the detection signal is extracted effectively, and the characteristics of the detection signal are deeply analyzed. It is very important to provide reliable basis for quantitative determination of the relationship between the damage of wire rope and the residual strength. In this paper, spectroscopic and metallographic experiments have been carried out on 72A1-82BC304316steel wire, and their chemical compositions have been obtained. The morphology and grain types of metallographic structure were observed. The chemical composition of the four steel wires and the relationship between the metallographic structure and their strength, plasticity, toughness, etc., were analyzed, and the advantages and disadvantages of the four kinds of steel wire properties were compared. It is concluded that: 72A and 82B steel wires are more suitable for making wire rope than 304 and 316 steel wires in strength, structure and properties. According to magnetic flux leakage principle, the MD120B wire rope inspection instrument imported from Poland is used to carry out simulation experiment. The different broken wire damage of 72A wire rope was detected. The detection signal was extracted, and the wave peak, wave width and number of broken wires, and the distance between broken wires were analyzed. The relationship between the damage parameters of wire breakage with different wire diameters. The wave peak, wave width, the number of broken wire and the distance between broken wires are obtained through the data processing and analysis of the detection signal. The relationship curve between the damage parameters of wire rope such as wire diameter and so on. This paper mainly studies the relationship between the damage detection signal of wire rope and its broken wire damage parameters, which provides data support for the in-service detection of wire rope, and provides a reference basis for quantitatively judging the relationship between the damage of wire rope and the residual strength.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TD532

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 袁方;胡斌梁;周知進(jìn);;在役鋼絲繩缺陷檢測(cè)方法的研究現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)與制造;2010年02期

2 竇毓棠,楊旭,竇伯莉;鋼絲繩(纜)全息定量無損檢測(cè)[J];礦山機(jī)械;2001年05期

3 吳賓義;ISO/DIS4309(ISO/TC96)起升機(jī)構(gòu)鋼絲繩的檢查方法和報(bào)廢標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(要點(diǎn))[J];起重運(yùn)輸機(jī)械;1981年05期

4 迪·澤弗林;以鋼絲繩試驗(yàn)研究成果為主要依據(jù)的鋼絲繩計(jì)算與選用[J];起重運(yùn)輸機(jī)械;1983年10期

5 褚建新，，顧偉;鋼絲繩電磁無損探傷研究的現(xiàn)狀及進(jìn)展[J];上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年02期

6 顧偉,褚建新;一種磁通門型鋼絲繩缺陷檢測(cè)傳感器[J];無損檢測(cè);1997年08期

7 宋大雷,張東來,徐殿國,王炎;鋼絲繩無損檢測(cè)技術(shù)的歷史、現(xiàn)狀及趨勢(shì)[J];無損檢測(cè);1999年05期

8 張東來,徐殿國;基于小波神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的鋼絲繩斷絲定性和定量檢測(cè)[J];儀器儀表學(xué)報(bào);2002年S2期

9 褚建新,顧偉;鋼絲繩缺陷漏磁場(chǎng)的磁通門檢測(cè)法[J];儀器儀表學(xué)報(bào);1997年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周郁明;基于磁阻傳感器的鋼絲繩斷絲信號(hào)的提取及處理[D];華中科技大學(xué);2004年

本文編號(hào)：1553418