1PE裝置使用超二十年壓力容器評估研究
[Abstract]:This paper aims at the evaluation of pressure vessel which has been used for more than 20 years in 1PE plant. The whole work includes data collection and analysis, field inspection and RBI evaluation of 1PE equipment. The corrosion of 89 pressure vessels in the inner and outer walls after 20 years of operation has been studied by analyzing the inspection data in the past years, and the corrosion rate of the pressure vessels has been calculated. Some pressure vessels have been modified during service, such as jacket structure, sealing structure of heat exchanger and so on. Based on the information provided by the Plastics Department to understand the process and corrosion of the plant, the information and data provided by API 581, referring to the failure analysis data of similar devices, and listening to the advice of materials and corrosion experts, After comprehensive analysis, it is determined that the main damage mechanisms of 1PE equipment failure include internal corrosion thinning, external damage (atmospheric corrosion and under-insulation corrosion). In this paper, the API 581 method is used to evaluate the risk of the pressure vessel of the 1PE plant, to determine the possible factors and potential consequences of each equipment risk, and to determine the risk level of each equipment. Based on this, the equipment inspection suggestion is put forward, and the factory arranges the equipment inspection. In this study, the strength of 4 ultra-high pressure vessels and 22 high-pressure vessels were checked according to the wall thickness of the current equipment, and the minimum wall thickness was calculated to ensure the safe operation of these high-pressure vessels during extended service. Due to the high purity of the medium stored in the 1PE plant, mainly ethylene, low corrosive impurity content, low average corrosion rate and reasonable material selection of the equipment, In 89 pressure vessels, the heat exchangers are prone to corrosion due to the presence of cooling water or high temperature steam, so it is necessary to strengthen the monitoring or replacement of stainless steel materials. Since the equipment is out of service for many years, the possibility of failure of the device increases year by year, and the risk distribution range is relatively large, so the strength of detection should be increased.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:TH49
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 常光忠;施哲雄;蔣曉東;;基于RBI方法的儲罐風(fēng)險評價技術(shù)研究與軟件開發(fā)[J];腐蝕科學(xué)與防護(hù)技術(shù);2009年03期
2 張光翔;;壓力容器失效分析與安全評定技術(shù)現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];中國公共安全(學(xué)術(shù)版);2008年Z1期
3 陳登豐;;在役承壓設(shè)備風(fēng)險管理技術(shù)的發(fā)展[J];化工設(shè)備與管道;2006年04期
4 黃賢濱,李延淵,蘭正貴;新一代設(shè)備管理技術(shù)——基于風(fēng)險的檢驗(yàn)[J];化工設(shè)備與防腐蝕;2004年03期
5 石超;張圣柱;羅艾民;多英全;;基于可靠度理論的RBI修正模型研究[J];中國安全生產(chǎn)科學(xué)技術(shù);2010年05期
6 馬連驥;趙建平;;多工況條件下高溫蠕變失效因子的計算方法[J];南京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2010年06期
7 劉小輝;吳惜偉;;煉油裝置腐蝕適應(yīng)性評價[J];安全、健康和環(huán)境;2006年11期
8 楊鐵成 ,陳學(xué)東 ,魏安安 ,王冰 ,胡久韶 ,陳誼民 ,楊琪新;基于半定量風(fēng)險分析的加氫裝置安全評估[J];壓力容器;2002年12期
9 陳學(xué)東,王冰,楊鐵成,艾志斌,闞強(qiáng)生,譚英培,B.Valette,顧望平,韓建宇,朱曉東;基于風(fēng)險的檢測(RBI)在中國石化企業(yè)的實(shí)踐及若干問題討論[J];壓力容器;2004年08期
10 陳學(xué)東;艾志斌;楊鐵成;王冰;顧望平;;基于風(fēng)險的檢測(RBI)中以剩余壽命為基準(zhǔn)的失效概率評價方法[J];壓力容器;2006年05期
,本文編號:2450698
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/jixiegongcheng/2450698.html