【摘要】：論文主要針對我國石油、化工、輕工、交通、食品、制藥、冶金、紡織等傳統(tǒng)部門所需的過程設(shè)備的關(guān)鍵部件-壓力容器進(jìn)行研究。 壓力容器可分解為筒體、封頭、支座、開孔接管、密封裝置、安全附件等，而封頭的作用是提供所需的承壓空間，根據(jù)幾何形狀的不同，封頭可以分為球形、橢圓形、蝶形、球冠形、錐殼和平蓋等幾種，其中球形、橢圓形、蝶形和球冠形封頭又統(tǒng)稱為凸形封頭。目前運(yùn)用較為廣泛的凸形封頭是球形封頭和橢圓形封頭，球形封頭因單位容積的表面積小，且在直徑、壁厚和工作壓力相同的條件下應(yīng)力最小，兩向薄膜應(yīng)力相等，而且沿經(jīng)線是均勻分布的。如果和壁厚相等的筒體連接，邊緣附近的最大應(yīng)力與薄膜應(yīng)力并無明顯不同等優(yōu)點(diǎn)被廣泛用于壓力較高、直徑較大的高壓容器和特殊需要的場合；而橢圓形封頭經(jīng)線曲率變化平滑連續(xù)，故應(yīng)力分布比較均勻，而橢圓形封頭深度較半球形封頭小得多，易于沖壓成型，，是目前中、低壓容器中應(yīng)用較多的封頭。由于壓力容器在社會(huì)各行各業(yè)的生產(chǎn)、儲存、運(yùn)輸?shù)确矫婢哂胁豢扇〈牡匚�，因此，為保證壓力容器工作時(shí)的安全，對球形封頭和橢圓形封頭進(jìn)行應(yīng)力分析及測定課題的研究是十分必要的。 目前應(yīng)力分析方法有解析方法、數(shù)值方法、實(shí)驗(yàn)應(yīng)力方法。隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展，新的實(shí)驗(yàn)應(yīng)力測定及分析方法不斷涌現(xiàn)，如電測法、光彈法、全息光彈法、全息干涉法、云紋法、散斑法等，目前應(yīng)用最廣泛的是電測法和光彈法。而本次研究將以解析法、電測法、有限元分析法分別進(jìn)行應(yīng)力分析，這種實(shí)驗(yàn)與理論相結(jié)合，用實(shí)驗(yàn)來驗(yàn)證理論分析的正確性，并借助計(jì)算機(jī)進(jìn)行分析的方法，當(dāng)前被廣泛使用。 本文研究的是壓力容器的球形封頭和橢圓形封頭的應(yīng)力測定及分析。該研究采用的是解析法、電測法、有限元分析法，首先在這些不同方法下分別獲得各自的結(jié)果，并將所得的結(jié)果進(jìn)行比較分析，指出兩種形式的封頭在實(shí)際應(yīng)用中應(yīng)注意的問題。最后將兩種形式的封頭的受力狀況和結(jié)構(gòu)特性進(jìn)行比較，說明兩種形式的封頭在壓力容器設(shè)計(jì)中被廣泛使用的原因，即球形封頭具有受力均勻、應(yīng)力較小的優(yōu)點(diǎn)，但深度大，整體沖壓成型較為困難；橢圓形封頭深度較淺，易于沖壓成型，且受力狀況僅次于球形封頭，而比其他封頭好。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly focuses on the research of pressure vessel, which is the key component of process equipment in traditional departments such as petroleum, chemical industry, light industry, transportation, food, pharmacy, metallurgy, textile and so on. The pressure vessel can be decomposed into the cylinder, the head, the support, the opening nozzle, the sealing device, the safety accessory, etc. The function of the head is to provide the required pressure space, according to the different geometry, the head can be divided into spherical, elliptical, butterfly, etc. The spherical, elliptical, butterfly and spherical crown heads are also known as convex heads. At present, the widely used convex head is spherical head and elliptical head. Because of the small surface area per unit volume, the spherical head has the smallest stress under the same diameter, wall thickness and working pressure, and the stress of the film is equal in both directions. And it is evenly distributed along the meridian. If the cylinder is connected with the wall thickness, the maximum stress near the edge and the film stress are not obviously different from each other. They are widely used in high pressure vessels with high pressure and large diameters and special needs. However, the curvature of the elliptical head is smooth and continuous, so the stress distribution is more uniform, and the depth of the elliptical head is much smaller than that of the hemispherical head, so it is easy to be punched. At present, the elliptical head is widely used in low pressure vessels. Since pressure vessels have an irreplaceable position in the production, storage and transportation of various sectors of society, in order to ensure the safety of pressure vessels, It is necessary to study the stress analysis and measurement of spherical head and elliptical head. At present, there are analytical method, numerical method and experimental stress method. With the development of science and technology, new experimental stress measurement and analysis methods have been emerging, such as electrometric method, photoelastic method, holographic interferometry, moire method, speckle method, etc. At present, the most widely used methods are electrometric method and photoelastic method. In this study, stress analysis will be carried out by analytical method, electric measurement method and finite element analysis method respectively. This kind of experiment is combined with theory to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis, and the method of computer analysis is used to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis. It is now widely used. The stress measurement and analysis of spherical and elliptical head of pressure vessel are studied in this paper. In this study, analytical method, electric measurement method and finite element analysis method are used. First of all, the respective results are obtained under these different methods, and the results obtained are compared and analyzed. The problems that should be paid attention to in practical application of two kinds of head are pointed out. Finally, by comparing the mechanical condition and structural characteristics of the two types of head, the reasons why the two types of head are widely used in the design of pressure vessel are explained, that is, the spherical head has the advantages of uniform force, small stress, but high depth. The whole stamping is difficult; The elliptical head is shallow in depth and easy to be punched, and its stress condition is second only to that of spherical head, which is better than that of other heads.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TH49

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅一新;滾柱式單向離合器套環(huán)應(yīng)力集中系數(shù)的確定[J];汽車電器;1989年04期

2 江迎春;陳無畏;;基于ANSYS的轎車轉(zhuǎn)向節(jié)疲勞壽命分析[J];汽車科技;2008年03期

3 王桂姣;周建美;;節(jié)能車車架選型和輕量化設(shè)計(jì)[J];汽車科技;2008年05期

4 金增平;大應(yīng)變測量中擴(kuò)大應(yīng)變儀量程的幾種方法[J];青島化工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2001年01期

5 劉蕊;王謙源;楊臻;張紅;;“中油海5”鉆井平臺懸臂梁強(qiáng)度試驗(yàn)分析[J];青島理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

6 韓樹新;鄭翔宇;金志江;夏福勇;韋新華;王曉芳;;含未焊透缺陷工業(yè)壓力管道的安全性試驗(yàn)研究[J];輕工機(jī)械;2008年04期

7 別超;張亞新;;基于ANSYS軟件的壓力容器高頸法蘭強(qiáng)度分析[J];輕工機(jī)械;2009年05期

8 李斌斌;張亞新;石傳美;;基于有限元法的壓力容器壁厚優(yōu)化[J];輕工機(jī)械;2009年06期

9 林國慶;王茂廷;;基于ANSYS軟件對壓力容器開孔接管區(qū)的應(yīng)力與疲勞分析[J];輕工機(jī)械;2011年02期

10 景鵬飛;謝禹鈞;;高壓容器筒體與封頭連接區(qū)的疲勞計(jì)算[J];輕工機(jī)械;2011年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 劉肖;傘海生;陳旭遠(yuǎn);;固支梁結(jié)構(gòu)的電容式RF MEMS開關(guān)的機(jī)電耦合模擬[A];第九屆全國振動(dòng)理論及應(yīng)用學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2007年

2 馬宇山;金濤;;基于ANSYS的塔設(shè)備地震與風(fēng)載分析[A];第五屆中國CAE工程分析技術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

3 王彬;鄭小平;;急冷器管線系統(tǒng)焊縫泄漏問題的有限元分析[A];北京力學(xué)會(huì)第13屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

4 周緣;鄭蘭疆;張冬林;姜圣翰;;安全閥波紋管承壓組件焊接結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)改進(jìn)[A];中國核科學(xué)技術(shù)進(jìn)展報(bào)告——中國核學(xué)會(huì)2009年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（第一卷·第2冊）[C];2009年

5 吳巍;牛軍燕;沈春燕;;基于ANSYS的自動(dòng)換刀機(jī)械手的有限元分析[A];全國先進(jìn)制造技術(shù)高層論壇暨第九屆制造業(yè)自動(dòng)化與信息化技術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

6 朱彥聰;鄭津洋;盧玉斌;林秀鋒;李翔;董華章;陳德福;;鋼絲纏繞增強(qiáng)塑料復(fù)合管外壓失穩(wěn)數(shù)值模擬與試驗(yàn)研究[A];第三屆全國管道技術(shù)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議壓力管道技術(shù)研究進(jìn)展精選集[C];2006年

7 閻石;孫威;王麗娜;綦寶暉;;利用CFRP加固鋼結(jié)構(gòu)吊車梁靜載實(shí)驗(yàn)研究與FEM分析[A];第五屆全國FRP學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

8 呂智勇;趙景云;;聯(lián)軸器和矯直輥軸的裝配過盈量對應(yīng)力的影響[A];第七屆(2009)中國鋼鐵年會(huì)論文集（下）[C];2009年

9 陳明亞;劉洋;何元章;徐宏;;急冷廢熱鍋爐下封頭法蘭熱變形分析[A];2011全國壓力容器壓力管道技術(shù)發(fā)展與使用暨新技術(shù)新產(chǎn)品交流會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

10 劉寶慶;厲鵬;林興華;蔣家羚;;激光焊蜂窩夾套壓力鼓脹的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究與有限元分析[A];壓力容器設(shè)計(jì)技術(shù)研究——第七屆全國壓力容器設(shè)計(jì)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨第七屆中國機(jī)械工程學(xué)會(huì)壓力容器分會(huì)設(shè)計(jì)委員會(huì)委員會(huì)議論文集[C];2010年

本文編號：2419117