CMM面向形位測量任務(wù)的不確定度評定
[Abstract]:The purpose of measurement is to obtain the measured value accurately. Because of the influence of unknown system error and random error in the process of measurement, the measurement result has uncertainty. The uncertainty of measurement represents the dispersion of the measured values and is an important parameter to be included in the measurement results. Coordinate measuring machine (CMM) is an important precision measuring instrument in the field of mechanical measurement. In theory, it can be used to measure any size and geometric error conveniently and quickly. In the aspect of shape and position error measurement, although the measurement accuracy of most CMM is less than that of roundness instrument, autocollimator and other special instruments or measuring tools, it has the advantages of diversity and convenience of measuring function, so it is more widely used in the field of modern industrial manufacturing. In this paper, CMM is chosen as the research object, and the evaluation of measurement uncertainty under the task of shape and position measurement is emphatically studied. This paper focuses on solving the measurement uncertainty evaluation modeling of CMM shape and position measurement task and the quantization of each uncertainty component. A complete and universal evaluation procedure of uncertainty of CMM shape and position measurement is presented. The main research work includes: firstly, based on the thought of black-box model, the evaluation model of uncertainty of CMM shape and position measurement based on quantitative characteristic index method is proposed, and the source of uncertainty of CMM measurement is analyzed. According to the characteristics of CMM shape and position measurement and relevant theoretical basis, this paper proposes quantifying the uncertainty components of shape and position measurement task by using maximum allowable detection error (MPEP,), maximum allowable indication error (MPEE), respectively. In this paper, the evaluation of measurement uncertainty by Monte Carlo method is studied in detail. Two methods of combining the uncertainty components of Monte Carlo method and adaptive Monte Carlo method are given, and compared with the traditional GUM method. The limitation of GUM method is analyzed. Finally, CMM flatness and parallelism are selected as experimental objects. The experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively solve the measurement uncertainty evaluation problem of CMM for shape and position measurement task. Because the uncertainty component introduced by the indication error occupies the advantage in the synthesis and does not accept the normal distribution, it is more scientific and reasonable to use the Monte Carlo method to synthesize the uncertainty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:TG83
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 徐磊;陳曉懷;程銀寶;姜瑞;李紅莉;;CMM機構(gòu)誤差引入的空間點不確定度評定[J];電子測量與儀器學(xué)報;2016年12期
2 程銀寶;陳曉懷;王漢斌;吳軍;李紅莉;徐磊;;CMM尺寸測量的不確定度評定模型研究[J];計量學(xué)報;2016年05期
3 方興華;宋明順;顧龍芳;陳意華;;基于自適應(yīng)蒙特卡羅方法的測量不確定度評定[J];計量學(xué)報;2016年04期
4 蘇長青;孫業(yè)翔;屈力剛;葉柏超;陳靖樂;;基于三坐標(biāo)測量機的采樣點數(shù)及其分布策略研究[J];中國工程機械學(xué)報;2015年06期
5 王東霞;宋愛國;;基于三坐標(biāo)測量機的圓度誤差不確定度評估[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2014年05期
6 石照耀;張斌;林家春;張華;;坐標(biāo)測量技術(shù)半世紀(jì)——演變與趨勢[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年05期
7 王金星;戴文靜;蔣向前;;直線度與平面度坐標(biāo)測量的不確定度計算[J];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2010年03期
8 程亮;童玲;;最大熵原理在測量數(shù)據(jù)處理中的應(yīng)用[J];電子測量與儀器學(xué)報;2009年01期
9 魏超;余曉芬;;平面度誤差的不確定度估計方法及取樣點數(shù)量的確定[J];計測技術(shù);2008年06期
10 王偉;宋明順;陳意華;顧龍方;陶靖軒;;蒙特卡羅方法在復(fù)雜模型測量不確定度評定中的應(yīng)用[J];儀器儀表學(xué)報;2008年07期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李紅莉;CMM尺寸測量不確定度模型與評定方法[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2015年
2 邵偉;蒙特卡洛方法及在一些統(tǒng)計模型中的應(yīng)用[D];山東大學(xué);2012年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 楊橋;CMM測量策略分析與不確定度評定[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2014年
2 董兆鵬;蒙特卡羅法在圓度誤差提取點數(shù)確定問題中的應(yīng)用[D];華僑大學(xué);2012年
3 連慧芳;形位誤差測量的不確定度評定[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號:2280024
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/jiagonggongyi/2280024.html