煙氣排放連續(xù)監(jiān)測系統(tǒng)不確定度分析
[Abstract]:(CEMS), a continuous monitoring system for flue gas emissions, is a continuous monitoring equipment for organized emissions of fixed pollution sources in China, especially for pollution sources in thermal power plants. At present, the relevant environmental protection departments have taken CEMS monitoring data as the basis of emission verification, sewage charge and other related work. Therefore, the accuracy of CEMS monitoring data is of great significance to environmental monitoring. Since 2000, the performance of CEMS has been tested in China, also known as applicability testing. In this paper, the uncertainty of the monitoring data of CEMS equipment in a thermal power plant in Lanzhou is evaluated, and the data quality is further verified by the quality control chart. The data dispersion and equipment stability of CEMS are explained from an uncertain point of view. The monitoring data of 7 CEMS monitoring daily statements were selected as the monitoring results. First of all, it is found that the particle concentration uncertainty of No. 1, No. 2 and No. 7 monitoring reports is large and the data dispersion is large. Combined with the quality control chart, it can be seen that the quality control charts of the three monitoring reports are out of control. It is proved that the quality of the data is poor. The uncertainty of the monitoring statements No. 4, No. 5 and No. 6 is small, which indicates that the dispersion of the data is small. Combined with the quality control chart, it can be seen that the data quality of the three monitoring reports is higher. In the process of analyzing each component, it can be seen that the repeatability of measurement contributes greatly to it, and the accuracy and error of the instrument itself are relatively small. The half width of confidence interval and the half width of allowable interval are also analyzed for particulate matter monitoring system, in which the half width of confidence interval is 7.47%, and the half width of allowable interval is 21.52%, all of which meet the performance requirements of continuous automatic monitoring instrument of particulate matter. For the gaseous pollutant monitoring system of the equipment, the monitoring data of SO2 concentration and NOx concentration are analyzed in this paper. The uncertainty analysis of SO2 concentration monitoring data shows that the uncertainty of SO2 concentration data of No. 1 and No. 3 monitoring reports is higher, which indicates that the dispersion of the data is large, and the corresponding quality control chart is out of control. It is proved that the data quality is poor. The uncertainty of SO2 concentration data in No. 4 monitoring report is the smallest, which indicates that the data dispersion is small, and the corresponding quality control chart shows that the data quality is the best, which proves that the reliability of the data is high. The uncertainty analysis of NOx concentration monitoring data shows that the uncertainty of NOx concentration monitoring data in daily report No. 1 is the largest, which indicates that the dispersion of the data is large, and the quality control chart corresponding to the report is out of control, which proves that the data quality is poor. The reliability is low. The uncertainty of NOx concentration monitoring data in report No. 4 is the smallest, and the quality performance of the corresponding quality control chart is the best, which proves that the reliability of the data is high. The results show that although the same measurement principle is used for the two pollutants, the uncertainty of SO2 concentration is obviously greater than that of NOx concentration. Through the analysis of its uncertainty component, it can be seen that the uncertainty of SO2 concentration is mainly introduced by the repeatability of measurement, which indicates that the measurement process has a great influence on the monitoring of SO2 concentration. When the uncertainty analysis of CEMS is carried out, the measurement model is not unique, and if different measurement methods or programs are adopted, the analysis model of uncertainty is also different. In this paper, according to the CEMS equipment of a thermal power plant in Lanzhou, the corresponding preliminary analysis model is established, and the source of uncertainty is not omitted as far as possible, and the uncertainty of each system is obtained by calculation. It provides a reference for the uncertainty analysis in the field of automatic monitoring of enterprise flue gas. The important academic value and practical significance of uncertainty analysis in environmental monitoring are further explained.
【學位授予單位】:蘭州交通大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:X84
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉婧艷;;脫硫煙氣連續(xù)在線多污染物監(jiān)測技術(shù)分析[J];中國高新技術(shù)企業(yè);2014年29期
2 丁小霞;;淺談環(huán)境監(jiān)測中的測量不確定度[J];化學工程與裝備;2014年07期
3 韋利杭;洪正f ;;環(huán)境監(jiān)測領(lǐng)域測量不確定度的評估[J];環(huán)境科學與技術(shù);2014年05期
4 張青松;;測量不確定度的研究及應(yīng)用進展[J];中國建材科技;2013年04期
5 連鑫;;CEMS比對監(jiān)測數(shù)據(jù)偏差研究[J];環(huán)境保護與循環(huán)經(jīng)濟;2013年06期
6 謝曄輝;;測量不確定度在工程試驗檢測數(shù)據(jù)處理中的應(yīng)用[J];中國新技術(shù)新產(chǎn)品;2013年08期
7 王建明;;測量結(jié)果及其不確定度評定[J];中國科教創(chuàng)新導刊;2012年31期
8 王曉香;王文佳;崔曉慶;劉娟;施超歐;;離子色譜儀器的不確定度比對[J];中國無機分析化學;2012年03期
9 韓玲莉;張福元;;天然氣能量計量不確定度評定方法[J];中國計量學院學報;2012年02期
10 歐陽松華;;PM_(2.5)在線監(jiān)測技術(shù)概述[J];中國環(huán)保產(chǎn)業(yè);2012年04期
,本文編號:2483393
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/huanjinggongchenglunwen/2483393.html