本文選題：生態(tài)資本主義　切入點(diǎn)：環(huán)境管治　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2016年04期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：生態(tài)危機(jī)業(yè)已成為當(dāng)今學(xué)界無(wú)法回避的重要議題,盡管諸多學(xué)者對(duì)資本文明消解生態(tài)問(wèn)題始終心存幻想,但研析綠色技術(shù)法、自然資本化和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移論等頗具成效的治理方案表明,歐美國(guó)家的生態(tài)修復(fù)因存在制度性缺陷和非正義取向而不宜效仿。唯有破除永恒資本的符咒及經(jīng)濟(jì)理性的拘囿,尋求文明范式的轉(zhuǎn)換,才能有效化解人地沖突擺脫生存困境。這對(duì)于我們正確處理資本市場(chǎng)與環(huán)境保護(hù)、社會(huì)主義與生態(tài)文明的關(guān)系大有裨益。
[Abstract]:The ecological crisis has become an important topic that can not be evaded by the academic circles today. Although many scholars have always had illusions about the solution of the ecological problem of capital civilization, they have studied the law of green technology. Natural capitalization and risk transfer theory show that ecological restoration in Europe and America should not be imitated because of its institutional defects and unjust orientation. Only the charm of eternal capital and the restriction of economic rationality can be broken. Only by seeking the transformation of civilization paradigm can we effectively resolve the conflict between man and land and get rid of the dilemma of existence, which is of great benefit to us in correctly handling the relationship between capital market and environmental protection, and between socialism and ecological civilization.
【作者單位】： 江南大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“第二國(guó)際理論家關(guān)于資本主義及其發(fā)展趨勢(shì)的比較研究及當(dāng)代價(jià)值”(15BKS066) 中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專(zhuān)項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目“生態(tài)學(xué)馬克思主義的生態(tài)危機(jī)理論研究”(JVSRP11577)成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：X32
，

本文編號(hào)：1639407