基于生產(chǎn)者責任延伸的建筑廢棄物管理研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-01-12 03:28
本文關(guān)鍵詞:基于生產(chǎn)者責任延伸的建筑廢棄物管理研究 出處:《大連理工大學》2015年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 建筑廢棄物 生產(chǎn)者責任延伸 建筑廢棄物管理 EPR機制
【摘要】:隨著城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)和經(jīng)濟發(fā)展,不可避免地產(chǎn)生大量建筑廢棄物,然而傳統(tǒng)的建設(shè)方式和管理模式不符合我國循環(huán)經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展理念,政府單方面的努力也難以應(yīng)對目前“垃圾圍城”的困境,因此運用新的理念構(gòu)建管理模式至關(guān)重要,生產(chǎn)者責任延伸(Extended Producer Responsibilities,簡稱EPR)作為發(fā)展循環(huán)經(jīng)濟的重要原則,為建筑廢棄物管理提供了新的思路。本論文通過對建筑廢棄物管理體系的研究,辨析了建筑廢棄物的定義、了解建筑廢棄物的組成、從宏觀、中觀和微觀角度總結(jié)了建筑廢棄物產(chǎn)量的影響因素;綜合國內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻、參閱歐盟、日本等政府行業(yè)報告、國內(nèi)外相關(guān)法規(guī)政策,調(diào)查了解國內(nèi)外建筑廢棄物管理現(xiàn)狀,對比研究日本和我國的管理制度,分析總結(jié)我國建筑廢棄物管理存在的問題,諸如管理層次低、管理主體和對象不明確、缺乏回收體系、監(jiān)管成本高,違法成本低等。在上述分析的基礎(chǔ)上,本文針對我國建筑廢棄物管理現(xiàn)狀,結(jié)合經(jīng)濟合作組織、歐盟、加拿大等國對生產(chǎn)者責任延伸的研究和實施狀況,提出將生產(chǎn)者責任延伸應(yīng)用于建筑廢棄物管理。本文根據(jù)經(jīng)合組織的研究成果,論證EPR應(yīng)用于建筑廢棄物管理的適用性,闡述建筑廢棄物EPR管理的優(yōu)勢,通過對EPR的深入研究,總結(jié)出EPR應(yīng)用機制的核心要素是責任主體、產(chǎn)品對象和責任模式、EPR實施工具這三方面。闡釋建筑廢棄物管理運行機制,從供應(yīng)鏈角度定義建筑廢棄物的“生產(chǎn)者”,認為對供應(yīng)鏈最具影響力的建設(shè)單位和直接產(chǎn)生建筑廢棄物的承包單位是聯(lián)合共同生產(chǎn)者;依據(jù)加拿大環(huán)境部的判斷矩陣定義EPR責任產(chǎn)品是混凝土骨料、木材、瀝青,結(jié)合產(chǎn)品屬性和行業(yè)特點確定生產(chǎn)者承擔集體回收責任模式;分析EPR實施工具對管理系統(tǒng)的影響,得出“回收要求”是基本的政策工具、“生產(chǎn)者”是連接上下游的關(guān)鍵,大多數(shù)EPR工具需要配合使用等,最后綜合構(gòu)建建筑廢棄物管理新模式并提出相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:With the construction of urbanization and economic development, it is inevitable to produce a large number of construction wastes. However, the traditional construction mode and management mode do not conform to the concept of circular economy development in China. The government's unilateral efforts are also difficult to cope with the current "garbage siege" plight, so the use of new ideas to build a management model is crucial. Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is an important principle of developing circular economy. Through the study of the construction waste management system, this paper analyzes the definition of construction waste, understand the composition of construction waste, from the macro perspective. The factors influencing the production of construction waste were summarized from the view of meso and micro. Comprehensive literature at home and abroad, refer to the European Union, Japan and other government industry reports, domestic and foreign relevant laws and policies, investigation and understanding of domestic and foreign construction waste management status, comparative study of Japan and China's management system. This paper analyzes and summarizes the existing problems of construction waste management in China, such as low management level, unclear management subject and object, lack of recovery system, high supervision cost, low illegal cost, etc. On the basis of the above analysis. This paper aims at the current situation of construction waste management in China, combined with the Economic Cooperation Organization, the European Union, Canada and other countries on the extension of producer responsibility research and implementation. According to the research results of OECD, this paper demonstrates the applicability of EPR in construction waste management. This paper expounds the advantages of construction waste EPR management, through the in-depth study of EPR, summarizes that the core elements of EPR application mechanism are responsible subject, product object and responsibility mode. This paper explains the operation mechanism of construction waste management and defines the "producer" of construction waste from the point of view of supply chain. It is considered that the construction units which have the most influence on the supply chain and the contractors that produce construction wastes directly are joint producers. According to the judgment matrix of Environment Canada, EPR liability products are defined as concrete aggregate, wood, asphalt, combined with product attributes and industry characteristics to determine the collective recovery responsibility model of producers; By analyzing the impact of EPR implementation tools on management system, it is concluded that "recovery requirement" is the basic policy tool, "producer" is the key to connect upstream and downstream, and most EPR tools need to be used together. Finally, a new model of construction waste management is constructed and some relevant suggestions are put forward.
【學位授予單位】:大連理工大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:X799.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 譚曉寧;;建筑廢棄物減量化管理運行新模式研究[J];建筑經(jīng)濟;2011年04期
2 張仕廉;李騰;;基于PPP模式的建筑垃圾資源化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[J];建筑經(jīng)濟;2011年10期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 吳澤洲;建筑垃圾量化及管理策略研究[D];重慶大學;2012年
,本文編號:1412505
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/huanjinggongchenglunwen/1412505.html
最近更新
教材專著