東江湖鉛鋅礦渣堆場(chǎng)土壤重金屬污染評(píng)價(jià)及治理方法研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞:東江湖鉛鋅礦渣堆場(chǎng)土壤重金屬污染評(píng)價(jià)及治理方法研究 出處:《湘潭大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 土壤 重金屬污染 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià) 淋洗 穩(wěn)定化
【摘要】:重金屬污染土壤對(duì)東江湖生態(tài)環(huán)境造成嚴(yán)重威脅,本研究沿東江湖鉛鋅礦渣堆場(chǎng)共布置71個(gè)具有代表性的采樣點(diǎn),對(duì)土壤中的Pb、Zn、Cu、Cd和As五種重金屬含量及其pH進(jìn)行了測(cè)定分析,并選用地積累指數(shù)法、環(huán)境容量法和潛在生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)法對(duì)渣場(chǎng)分別進(jìn)行土壤重金屬污染風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)。在此基礎(chǔ)上,針對(duì)重金屬污染土壤進(jìn)行淋洗處理和穩(wěn)定化的小試研究,采用草酸、檸檬酸、EDTA和茶皂素進(jìn)行土壤重金屬淋洗實(shí)驗(yàn),確定最佳淋洗劑、淋洗濃度、淋洗時(shí)間和液土比。同時(shí),采用骨炭、氧化鈣、硫化鈉、過(guò)磷酸鈣、二乙基二硫代氨基甲酸鈉、硫酸亞鐵等不同類型的穩(wěn)定劑進(jìn)行土壤重金屬穩(wěn)定化實(shí)驗(yàn),考察單一穩(wěn)定劑和組配穩(wěn)定劑對(duì)土壤重金屬的穩(wěn)定效果,并確定最佳單一穩(wěn)定劑及其投加量、最佳組配穩(wěn)定劑及其組配比例。研究所得主要結(jié)果如下:(1)東江湖鉛鋅礦渣堆場(chǎng)土壤中各重金屬平均含量分別為湖南省土壤背景值的64、3.6、5.5、18.5、7.6倍;根據(jù)超標(biāo)倍數(shù)排序?yàn)镻bCdAsCuZn,對(duì)地積累指數(shù)平均值進(jìn)行排序?yàn)镻bCdAsCuZn,對(duì)環(huán)境容量評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果平均值進(jìn)行排序?yàn)?PbCdAsCuZn,對(duì)潛在生態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)平均值進(jìn)行排序?yàn)?CdPbAsCuZn。堆場(chǎng)土壤重金屬污染最為嚴(yán)重區(qū)域主要集中在礦渣原堆放點(diǎn),即堆場(chǎng)的東北部、中部和西南部。(2)實(shí)驗(yàn)得到草酸為最佳淋洗劑,其對(duì)Pb、Zn、Cu、Cd和As均有較好的淋洗效果。最佳淋洗條件為:淋洗濃度為0.2 mol/L、淋洗時(shí)間為10h、淋洗液土比為25:1。在優(yōu)化實(shí)驗(yàn)條件下,對(duì)Pb、Zn、Cu、Cd和As等重金屬的去除率分別為38.45%、39.33%、39.66%、34.61%、35.24%。(3)根據(jù)單一穩(wěn)定劑綜合穩(wěn)定率可知,氧化鈣的綜合穩(wěn)定效果最好,其投加量為3g/100g時(shí),土壤中Pb、Zn、Cu、Cd和As的穩(wěn)定率分別為73.82%、38.11%、75.00%、42.94%和57.69%。(4)根據(jù)組配穩(wěn)定劑綜合穩(wěn)定率可知,最佳組配穩(wěn)定劑為穩(wěn)定劑A(骨炭、硫化鈉),其最佳組配比例為3:1,對(duì)土壤中的Pb、Zn、Cu、Cd和As均有良好的穩(wěn)定效果,其穩(wěn)定效率分別為99.05%、84.41%、64.29%、81.76%和11.54%。SEM表征結(jié)果表明,處理后土壤表面相對(duì)粗糙并出現(xiàn)部分結(jié)晶體,且形成了針狀或棒狀結(jié)晶,從而使得重金屬離子難以浸出,形成穩(wěn)定的固態(tài)體。
[Abstract]:The soil heavy metal pollution poses a serious threat to the ecological environment of the eastern lakes, rivers and lakes along the east yard layout is lead-zinc slag 71 representative samples, the soil Pb, Zn, Cu, Cd and As five kinds of heavy metal content and pH were analyzed, and the accumulation index method, environmental capacity and the potential ecological risk method of slag field is used to evaluate the risk of heavy metal pollution of soil. On the basis of laboratory study, washing treatment and stabilization for heavy metal contaminated soil using oxalic acid, citric acid, EDTA and tea saponin of soil heavy metal leaching experiment, determine the optimal eluent, elution concentration, leaching time and liquid soil. At the same time, the use of bone char, calcium oxide, sodium sulfide, calcium superphosphate, two ethyl two sodium dithiocarbamate stabilizer, ferrous sulfate and other different types of heavy metals in the soil of experimental stability, stable single study The effect of stabilizer and stability with stabilizer on heavy metals in the soil, and to determine the optimal single stabilizer and its dosage, the best combination of stabilizer and its combination ratio. The experimental results were summarized as follows: (1) the average content of heavy metals in soil in Dongjiang Lake lead-zinc slag yard were 64,3.6,5.5,18.5,7.6 times of the soil background value of Hunan province; according to the exceed the standard multiple ranked PbCdAsCuZn, the accumulation index average of the order of PbCdAsCuZn, ranking for average value of environmental capacity evaluation results: PbCdAsCuZn, as a sort of average value of the potential ecological risk of soil heavy metal pollution: CdPbAsCuZn. yard is the most serious areas are mainly concentrated in the original slag stacking yard, namely the northeast, central and the southwest. (2) the best oxalic acid as eluent, the Pb, Zn, Cu, Cd and As have better effect. The optimum conditions for leaching leaching: leaching concentration For 0.2 mol/L, the leaching time is 10h, the eluent is 25:1. ratio under the optimized experimental conditions, the Pb, Zn, Cu, Cd and As and other heavy metal removal rates were 38.45%, 39.33%, 39.66%, 34.61%, 35.24%. (3) according to the comprehensive stability rate of single stabilizer, the best comprehensive stabilization effect of calcium oxide, the dosage of 3g/100g, Pb in soil, Zn, Cu, Cd and As stable rates were 73.82%, 38.11%, 75%, 42.94% and 57.69%. (4) according to the group with stable rate of the integrated stabilizer stabilizer, A is the best combination of stabilizer (char, sodium sulfide), the best group the ratio of 3:1 to Pb in soil, Zn, Cu, Cd and As have good effect of stability, the stable rate was 99.05%, 84.41%, 64.29%, 81.76% and 11.54%.SEM. The results showed that after treatment, the soil surface is relatively rough and some crystals, and the formation of a needle or rod shape, which makes the from the heavy metal The seed is difficult to leach to form a stable solid.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:X53;X825
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 邢艷帥;喬冬梅;朱桂芬;齊學(xué)斌;;土壤重金屬污染及植物修復(fù)技術(shù)研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2014年17期
2 周鳴;湯紅妍;朱書法;葛兵兵;胡劍;;EDTA強(qiáng)化電動(dòng)力學(xué)修復(fù)重金屬?gòu)?fù)合污染土壤[J];環(huán)境工程學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期
3 石紅蕾;周啟星;;生物炭對(duì)污染物的土壤環(huán)境行為影響研究進(jìn)展[J];生態(tài)學(xué)雜志;2014年02期
4 劉崇敏;黃益宗;于方明;徐峰;孫曉鏵;伍文;鐘敏;;改性沸石對(duì)土壤鉛、鋅賦存形態(tài)的影響[J];環(huán)境工程學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期
5 王浩;潘利祥;張翔宇;李萌;宋寶華;;復(fù)合穩(wěn)定劑對(duì)砷污染土壤的穩(wěn)定研究[J];環(huán)境科學(xué);2013年09期
6 宋偉;陳百明;劉琳;;中國(guó)耕地土壤重金屬污染概況[J];水土保持研究;2013年02期
7 黃益宗;郝曉偉;雷鳴;鐵柏清;;重金屬污染土壤修復(fù)技術(shù)及其修復(fù)實(shí)踐[J];農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期
8 梁金利;蔡煥興;段雪梅;戴玄吏;余益軍;;有機(jī)酸土柱淋洗法修復(fù)重金屬污染土壤[J];環(huán)境工程學(xué)報(bào);2012年09期
9 孫銳;舒帆;孫衛(wèi)玲;郝偉;李麗;;典型鉛鋅礦區(qū)水稻土重金屬污染特征及其與土壤性質(zhì)的關(guān)系[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年01期
10 王利;李永華;姬艷芳;楊林生;李海蓉;張秀武;虞江萍;;羥基磷灰石和氯化鉀聯(lián)用修復(fù)鉛鋅礦區(qū)鉛鎘污染土壤的研究[J];環(huán)境科學(xué);2011年07期
,本文編號(hào):1400235
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/huanjinggongchenglunwen/1400235.html