基于遙感與GIS的黃河三角洲生態(tài)建設(shè)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-07-01 13:51
【摘要】：人類社會經(jīng)濟(jì)活動的不斷發(fā)展導(dǎo)致生態(tài)環(huán)境問題日益嚴(yán)重，人口超載、資源過量開采、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)不合理和環(huán)境污染等使經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與生態(tài)環(huán)境的關(guān)系比以往更加敏感，生態(tài)敏感區(qū)或生態(tài)脆弱區(qū)的生態(tài)環(huán)境狀況變得更為嚴(yán)峻。改革開放以來，隨著黃河三角洲地區(qū)大規(guī)模開發(fā)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平高速增長，但同時也造成了當(dāng)?shù)厣鷳B(tài)環(huán)境狀況的迅速惡化，地區(qū)開發(fā)中后期脆弱的生態(tài)環(huán)境極大地制約了當(dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，使經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與生態(tài)環(huán)境相互依賴、相互作用的關(guān)系日益凸顯。黃河三角洲地區(qū)作為我國典型生態(tài)敏感區(qū)和特殊生態(tài)功能區(qū)，因其特殊的自然和區(qū)位條件，一方面表現(xiàn)出環(huán)境脆弱的生態(tài)特點(diǎn)，另一方面又顯示出具有良好經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展態(tài)勢的自然優(yōu)勢，成為影響全國生態(tài)安全的重要組成部分。黃河三角洲作為連接?xùn)|北地區(qū)、華北地區(qū)、華中地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要樞紐區(qū)，其生態(tài)建設(shè)不僅是促進(jìn)山東省社會經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)，而且對維護(hù)環(huán)渤海和黃河下游的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展、生態(tài)安全以及完善全國沿海經(jīng)濟(jì)布局、提升環(huán)渤海地區(qū)整體實力和競爭力具有非常深遠(yuǎn)的現(xiàn)實和歷史意義。 本研究選取黃河三角洲主體區(qū)域東營市和濱州市為研究對象，綜合運(yùn)用地理信息技術(shù)和多元統(tǒng)計分析，以利用2001年、2005年和2010年三期Landsat遙感影像提取的反映生態(tài)環(huán)境狀況的土地利用數(shù)據(jù)、植被覆蓋數(shù)據(jù)、水網(wǎng)密度數(shù)據(jù)和土地退化數(shù)據(jù)；環(huán)境污染柵格化數(shù)據(jù)及2001-2010年東營市、濱州市兩市社會經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展資料為主要數(shù)據(jù)源，從整體和區(qū)域差異角度，利用地理學(xué)、生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、遙感和GIS技術(shù)，系統(tǒng)地對東營市、濱州市2001-2010年生態(tài)環(huán)境狀況、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r進(jìn)行評價，并對研究區(qū)內(nèi)生態(tài)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動水平進(jìn)行定量分析，揭示研究區(qū)不同時期的生態(tài)環(huán)境、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展動態(tài)變化規(guī)律，探討建立研究區(qū)生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的互動模式。主要結(jié)論有： 1.2001-2010年間東營市、濱州市兩市總體生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量呈現(xiàn)上升趨勢，東營市生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量指數(shù)從2001年的0.395上升2010年的0.477；濱州市生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量指數(shù)從2001年的0.262上升到2010年的0.489。制約兩市生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量的主要因子為耕地面積、林地面積和污染物排放量。部分區(qū)縣生態(tài)環(huán)境狀況呈退化趨勢，其中無棣縣生態(tài)環(huán)境惡化情況最為嚴(yán)重，生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量指數(shù)為全區(qū)最低，并呈現(xiàn)持續(xù)衰退的趨勢；河口區(qū)的生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量衰退程度最大，十年間生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量指數(shù)退化了2.553。其余區(qū)縣的生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量發(fā)展平穩(wěn)，均表現(xiàn)出不同程度的上升趨勢，惠民縣生態(tài)環(huán)境狀況發(fā)展水平最好，2010年生態(tài)環(huán)境指數(shù)達(dá)到1.732，年均增長幅度高于全區(qū)平均水平。 2.2001-2010年間東營市、濱州市兩市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展質(zhì)量總體呈現(xiàn)增長趨勢，各區(qū)縣經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平均有不同幅度的增長。東營市2010年經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展質(zhì)量指數(shù)達(dá)到0.653，較2001年增長了1.99；濱州市2010年經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展質(zhì)量指數(shù)達(dá)到0.603，較2001年增長1.7。各區(qū)縣中經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平最好的為鄒平縣，2001-2010年間經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展實力增長幅度高達(dá)2.17，該縣經(jīng)濟(jì)一直保持快速發(fā)展水平；墾利縣作為勝利油田主產(chǎn)區(qū)，石油化工、精細(xì)化工等產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展具有先天優(yōu)勢，同時在新技術(shù)的推動下，裝備制造、新能源、新材料等新興產(chǎn)業(yè)不斷發(fā)展，經(jīng)濟(jì)實力迅猛增長，從2001年的-0.49增長到2010年的1.18，經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)得到優(yōu)化；廣饒縣和濱城區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)水平發(fā)展平穩(wěn)，經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展質(zhì)量指數(shù)實現(xiàn)了穩(wěn)步增長。陽信縣由于缺少突出的優(yōu)勢產(chǎn)業(yè)帶動，區(qū)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)力水平較低，其經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展質(zhì)量指數(shù)得分排名全區(qū)倒數(shù)，且經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平增長幅度最小。 3.2001-2010年間東營市、濱州市的生態(tài)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動水平呈現(xiàn)“∩”型變化趨勢，以2007年為拐點(diǎn)，兩市互動度水平經(jīng)歷了緩慢上升、快速上升和緩慢下降的過程。2001年東營市生態(tài)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動度得分為0.418，2010年互動度得分為0.519，上升了0.101；2007年東營市互動度得分為0.664，為十年間互動度得分最高的年份。濱州市生態(tài)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動度得分由2001年的0.420上升到2010年0.602，上升了1.82。2005年以前兩市生態(tài)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動水平的制約因素主要是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平，2005年以后區(qū)域內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)實力的不斷上升，生產(chǎn)力水平也得到提高，改造自然環(huán)境利用自然環(huán)境的程度也隨之不斷加深。由于黃河三角洲地區(qū)成陸時間較晚，生態(tài)環(huán)境脆弱，不合理的、粗放的經(jīng)濟(jì)開發(fā)模式會嚴(yán)重破壞人地和諧關(guān)系，加劇環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)的不協(xié)調(diào)程度。東營市和濱州市兩市2001年-2010年生態(tài)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動水平呈現(xiàn)明顯環(huán)境滯后型特點(diǎn)，各區(qū)縣生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量得分普遍低于該區(qū)縣經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展質(zhì)量得分。通過對總體時間序列軌跡分析，，黃河三角洲地區(qū)呈現(xiàn)出生態(tài)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動水平由輕微互動衰退型向中等互動發(fā)展型演進(jìn)的趨勢，但這并不意味著其生態(tài)環(huán)境建設(shè)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展互動關(guān)系已經(jīng)處于良性循環(huán)狀態(tài)，與類似地區(qū)相比，其經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平仍然較低，生態(tài)環(huán)境綜合效益指數(shù)不高。
[Abstract]:The continuous development of the economic activities of the human society has led to the growing ecological environment, the overload of the population, the excessive exploitation of resources, the irrational industrial structure and the environmental pollution, and the relationship between the economic development and the ecological environment is more sensitive than that of the past, The ecological environment of the ecological sensitive area or the ecological fragile area becomes more severe. Since the reform and opening-up, with the large-scale development of the Yellow River Delta region and the high-speed growth of the economic development level, the rapid deterioration of the local ecological environment is also caused, the fragile ecological environment in the middle and later period of the development of the region greatly restricts the development of the local economy, The relationship between economic development and ecological environment is becoming more and more prominent. As a typical ecological sensitive area and special ecological functional area of our country, the Yellow River Delta area, because of its special natural and location conditions, shows the ecological characteristics of the environment, on the other hand, it shows the natural advantage with good economic development. It has become an important part of the national ecological security. As an important hub for the economic development of the Northeast, North China and Central China, the Yellow River Delta is not only the basis for promoting the sustainable development of the social and economic development of Shandong, but also the economic development in the Bohai Sea and the lower reaches of the Yellow River. The ecological security, as well as the improvement of the whole country's coastal economic layout, has a very far-reaching realistic and historical significance to improve the overall strength and competitiveness of the Bohai Rim. In this study, the research objects of Dongying and Binzhou in the main area of the Yellow River Delta were selected, and the geographic information technology and the multivariate statistical analysis were used to extract the land-use data and the number of vegetation cover of the ecological environment, which were extracted by Landsat remote sensing images in 2001,2005 and 2010. According to the data of water network density and land degradation data, the grid-based data of environmental pollution and the data of social and economic development in Dongying City and Binzhou City from 2001 to 2010 are the main data sources. From the perspective of overall and regional difference, Dongying is systematically applied to Dongying by means of geography, ecological economics, remote sensing and GIS technology. The ecological environment and economic development of the city and the city of Binzhou in 2001-2010 are evaluated, and the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development in the study area is analyzed quantitatively, and the dynamic changes of the ecological environment and the economic development in different periods of the study area are revealed. A Study on the Interactive Model of the Sustainable Development of the Ecological Economy in the Research Area IV. Main conclusions From 2001 to 2010, the overall ecological environment quality of Dongying City and Binzhou City showed an upward trend, the ecological environment quality index of Dongying City increased from 0.395 in 2001 to 0.477 in 2010, and the environmental quality index of Binzhou rose from 0.262 in 2001 to 0 in 2010. The main factors that restrict the quality of the ecological environment in the two cities are the cultivated area, the area of the forest land and the pollutants. The ecological environment in some areas is in a degraded trend, in which the ecological environment deterioration of the Wuyi county is the most serious, the ecological environment quality index is the lowest in the whole region, and the trend of the continuous decline is presented; and the ecological environment quality recession of the river mouth area In the last ten years, the index of eco-environmental quality is degraded by 2. 553. The development of the ecological environment in the rest of the counties is stable, and the development level of the ecological environment in Huimin County is the best. In 2010, the ecological environment index reached 1.732, and the annual growth rate was higher than that of the whole area. Average level. 2.2001-2010, the economic development quality of the two cities in Binzhou City shows a trend of growth, and the economic development level of each district is different. The economic development quality index of Dongying City reached 0.653 in 2010, and 1.99 in 2001, and the economic development quality index in Binzhou City reached 0.603, compared with 2001. Growth 1.7. The level of economic development in various districts is the best of Zouping County. The growth of economic development is up to 2.17 in 2001-2010, and the economy of the county has maintained a rapid development level. As a main production area of Shengli Oilfield, Kenli County is the development tool of the industry such as petrochemical industry and fine chemical industry. With the development of new industries such as equipment manufacturing, new energy and new materials under the promotion of new technology, the economic strength has increased rapidly, from-0.49 in 2001 to 1.18 in 2010, and the economic structure of the economy is optimized; and the economic water in Guangrao and Bincheng District The smooth development of the level and the realization of the economic development quality index In Yangxin County, due to the lack of outstanding advantage industry, the productivity level in the region is lower, and the economic development quality index score is the reciprocal of the whole region, and the economic development level is increased. The long-range minimum. 3.2001-2010, the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development of the Dongying City and Binzhou presents the "a hand"-type change trend, which is the inflection point in 2007 and the level of interaction between the two cities In 2001, the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development of Dongying City was divided into 0.418, the interaction degree in 2010 was divided into 0.519, the rise of 0.101, and the interaction degree of Dongying City in 2007 was divided into 0.664, and the interaction degree in the last ten years In the year of the highest score, the degree of interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development of Binzhou City increased from 0.420 in 2001 to 0.602 in 2010, up from 1.82.2005, the restriction factor of the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development of the two cities before and after 2005 was mainly the level of economic development, and the economy in the region after 2005 The rising of strength and the level of productivity are also improved and the natural environment is transformed to the extent that the natural environment is used As a result of the late development of land and land in the Yellow River Delta, the ecological environment is fragile and unreasonable, and the extensive economic development pattern will seriously destroy the harmonious relationship of the people, and intensify the environment and the development. The eco-environment and economic development interaction level of Dongying City and Binzhou City in 2001-2010 show significant environmental lag characteristics, and the quality score of ecological environment in each district is generally lower than that of the county. On the basis of the analysis of the overall time series, the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development in the Yellow River Delta region is caused by the slight interaction recession type to the middle interactive It does not mean that the interaction between the ecological environment construction and the economic development has been in a virtuous circle, and the economic development level of the ecological environment is still lower than that of the similar region.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：X22;X87;P208
本文編號：2508534
[Abstract]:The continuous development of the economic activities of the human society has led to the growing ecological environment, the overload of the population, the excessive exploitation of resources, the irrational industrial structure and the environmental pollution, and the relationship between the economic development and the ecological environment is more sensitive than that of the past, The ecological environment of the ecological sensitive area or the ecological fragile area becomes more severe. Since the reform and opening-up, with the large-scale development of the Yellow River Delta region and the high-speed growth of the economic development level, the rapid deterioration of the local ecological environment is also caused, the fragile ecological environment in the middle and later period of the development of the region greatly restricts the development of the local economy, The relationship between economic development and ecological environment is becoming more and more prominent. As a typical ecological sensitive area and special ecological functional area of our country, the Yellow River Delta area, because of its special natural and location conditions, shows the ecological characteristics of the environment, on the other hand, it shows the natural advantage with good economic development. It has become an important part of the national ecological security. As an important hub for the economic development of the Northeast, North China and Central China, the Yellow River Delta is not only the basis for promoting the sustainable development of the social and economic development of Shandong, but also the economic development in the Bohai Sea and the lower reaches of the Yellow River. The ecological security, as well as the improvement of the whole country's coastal economic layout, has a very far-reaching realistic and historical significance to improve the overall strength and competitiveness of the Bohai Rim. In this study, the research objects of Dongying and Binzhou in the main area of the Yellow River Delta were selected, and the geographic information technology and the multivariate statistical analysis were used to extract the land-use data and the number of vegetation cover of the ecological environment, which were extracted by Landsat remote sensing images in 2001,2005 and 2010. According to the data of water network density and land degradation data, the grid-based data of environmental pollution and the data of social and economic development in Dongying City and Binzhou City from 2001 to 2010 are the main data sources. From the perspective of overall and regional difference, Dongying is systematically applied to Dongying by means of geography, ecological economics, remote sensing and GIS technology. The ecological environment and economic development of the city and the city of Binzhou in 2001-2010 are evaluated, and the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development in the study area is analyzed quantitatively, and the dynamic changes of the ecological environment and the economic development in different periods of the study area are revealed. A Study on the Interactive Model of the Sustainable Development of the Ecological Economy in the Research Area IV. Main conclusions From 2001 to 2010, the overall ecological environment quality of Dongying City and Binzhou City showed an upward trend, the ecological environment quality index of Dongying City increased from 0.395 in 2001 to 0.477 in 2010, and the environmental quality index of Binzhou rose from 0.262 in 2001 to 0 in 2010. The main factors that restrict the quality of the ecological environment in the two cities are the cultivated area, the area of the forest land and the pollutants. The ecological environment in some areas is in a degraded trend, in which the ecological environment deterioration of the Wuyi county is the most serious, the ecological environment quality index is the lowest in the whole region, and the trend of the continuous decline is presented; and the ecological environment quality recession of the river mouth area In the last ten years, the index of eco-environmental quality is degraded by 2. 553. The development of the ecological environment in the rest of the counties is stable, and the development level of the ecological environment in Huimin County is the best. In 2010, the ecological environment index reached 1.732, and the annual growth rate was higher than that of the whole area. Average level. 2.2001-2010, the economic development quality of the two cities in Binzhou City shows a trend of growth, and the economic development level of each district is different. The economic development quality index of Dongying City reached 0.653 in 2010, and 1.99 in 2001, and the economic development quality index in Binzhou City reached 0.603, compared with 2001. Growth 1.7. The level of economic development in various districts is the best of Zouping County. The growth of economic development is up to 2.17 in 2001-2010, and the economy of the county has maintained a rapid development level. As a main production area of Shengli Oilfield, Kenli County is the development tool of the industry such as petrochemical industry and fine chemical industry. With the development of new industries such as equipment manufacturing, new energy and new materials under the promotion of new technology, the economic strength has increased rapidly, from-0.49 in 2001 to 1.18 in 2010, and the economic structure of the economy is optimized; and the economic water in Guangrao and Bincheng District The smooth development of the level and the realization of the economic development quality index In Yangxin County, due to the lack of outstanding advantage industry, the productivity level in the region is lower, and the economic development quality index score is the reciprocal of the whole region, and the economic development level is increased. The long-range minimum. 3.2001-2010, the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development of the Dongying City and Binzhou presents the "a hand"-type change trend, which is the inflection point in 2007 and the level of interaction between the two cities In 2001, the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development of Dongying City was divided into 0.418, the interaction degree in 2010 was divided into 0.519, the rise of 0.101, and the interaction degree of Dongying City in 2007 was divided into 0.664, and the interaction degree in the last ten years In the year of the highest score, the degree of interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development of Binzhou City increased from 0.420 in 2001 to 0.602 in 2010, up from 1.82.2005, the restriction factor of the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development of the two cities before and after 2005 was mainly the level of economic development, and the economy in the region after 2005 The rising of strength and the level of productivity are also improved and the natural environment is transformed to the extent that the natural environment is used As a result of the late development of land and land in the Yellow River Delta, the ecological environment is fragile and unreasonable, and the extensive economic development pattern will seriously destroy the harmonious relationship of the people, and intensify the environment and the development. The eco-environment and economic development interaction level of Dongying City and Binzhou City in 2001-2010 show significant environmental lag characteristics, and the quality score of ecological environment in each district is generally lower than that of the county. On the basis of the analysis of the overall time series, the interaction between the ecological environment and the economic development in the Yellow River Delta region is caused by the slight interaction recession type to the middle interactive It does not mean that the interaction between the ecological environment construction and the economic development has been in a virtuous circle, and the economic development level of the ecological environment is still lower than that of the similar region.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：X22;X87;P208
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 方創(chuàng)琳,鮑超;黑河流域水-生態(tài)-經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展耦合模型及應(yīng)用[J];地理學(xué)報;2004年05期
2 張曉東,池天河;90年代中國省級區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)與環(huán)境協(xié)調(diào)度分析[J];地理研究;2001年04期
3 徐中民,張志強(qiáng),程國棟;當(dāng)代生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)的綜合研究綜述[J];地球科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2000年06期
4 申玉銘，方創(chuàng)琳;區(qū)域PRED協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的有關(guān)理論問題[J];地域研究與開發(fā);1996年04期
5 安永會;張福存;姚秀菊;;黃河三角洲水土鹽形成演化與分布特征[J];地球與環(huán)境;2006年03期
6 周華榮,潘伯榮,海熱提·涂爾遜;新疆生態(tài)環(huán)境現(xiàn)狀綜合評價研究[J];干旱區(qū)地理;2001年01期
7 邵波,陳興鵬;中國西北地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)與生態(tài)環(huán)境協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀研究[J];干旱區(qū)地理;2005年01期
8 江振藍(lán),沙晉明,楊武年;基于GIS的福州市生態(tài)環(huán)境遙感綜合評價模型[J];國土資源遙感;2004年03期
9 廖重斌;;環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的定量評判及其分類體系——以珠江三角洲城市群為例[J];廣州環(huán)境科學(xué);1996年01期
10 劉賢趙;王淵;張勇;田艷林;王春芝;王志強(qiáng);;黃河三角洲地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與生態(tài)環(huán)境建設(shè)互動度研究[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2013年06期
本文編號：2508534
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/dizhicehuilunwen/2508534.html
最近更新
教材專著
