本文選題：遞增階梯定價(jià) + 充分統(tǒng)計(jì)量��； 參考：《經(jīng)濟(jì)研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：本文通過(guò)求解階梯定價(jià)下福利損失與再分配效應(yīng)的充分統(tǒng)計(jì)量,構(gòu)建評(píng)估與優(yōu)化階梯定價(jià)的半結(jié)構(gòu)式充分統(tǒng)計(jì)量模型。利用從國(guó)家電網(wǎng)隨機(jī)抽取的2003—2011年杭州市5000戶居民的月度電量消費(fèi)數(shù)據(jù),評(píng)估樣本期內(nèi)實(shí)施與調(diào)整階梯定價(jià)的政策效果;在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)最優(yōu)階梯定價(jià)機(jī)制進(jìn)行優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì),進(jìn)一步評(píng)價(jià)了杭州市2012年最新階梯定價(jià)調(diào)整政策。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):(1)2004年與2006年杭州市實(shí)施與調(diào)整階梯定價(jià)的福利損失分配效應(yīng)轉(zhuǎn)化率逐步上升,階梯定價(jià)再分配的邊際福利損失與初次分配的稅收邊際福利損失相當(dāng);(2)分時(shí)階梯定價(jià)分配效應(yīng)轉(zhuǎn)化率比純階梯定價(jià)低,嵌入分時(shí)定價(jià)的階梯定價(jià)不能有效地實(shí)現(xiàn)階梯定價(jià)目標(biāo);(3)與最優(yōu)階梯定價(jià)機(jī)制相比,2012年的最新階梯定價(jià)調(diào)整方向正確,但第一階梯長(zhǎng)度擴(kuò)展過(guò)多、第二階梯擴(kuò)展不足,而階梯加價(jià)太小;(4)較之結(jié)構(gòu)與縮減式模型,充分統(tǒng)計(jì)量方法極大節(jié)約數(shù)據(jù)信息量并能進(jìn)行福利分析。本文的研究為評(píng)估與優(yōu)化我國(guó)各類政府公用事業(yè)改革開(kāi)拓了一條新思路。
[Abstract]:In this paper, by solving the sufficient statistics of welfare loss and redistribution effect under ladder pricing, a semi-structural sufficient statistic model for evaluating and optimizing ladder pricing is constructed.The monthly electricity consumption data of 5000 households in Hangzhou from 2003 to 2011 were selected randomly from State Grid to evaluate the effect of implementing and adjusting ladder pricing policy in the sample period, on the basis of which the optimal ladder pricing mechanism was optimized and designed.Further evaluation of Hangzhou in 2012 the latest ladder pricing adjustment policy.The study found that the conversion rate of welfare loss distribution effect of implementing and adjusting ladder pricing in Hangzhou City in 2004 and 2006 gradually increased.The marginal welfare loss of step pricing redistribution is equivalent to that of tax marginal welfare loss of initial distribution. The conversion rate of step pricing distribution effect is lower than that of pure step pricing.Compared with the optimal ladder pricing mechanism, the latest step pricing adjustment direction in 2012 is correct, but the first step length expansion is too much, the second step expansion is insufficient.Compared with the structure and the reduced model, the sufficient statistical method greatly saves the data information and can carry on the welfare analysis.The research of this paper opens up a new way to evaluate and optimize the reform of various kinds of government utilities in China.
【作者單位】： 西南大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院;西南大學(xué)農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究中心;中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院財(cái)經(jīng)戰(zhàn)略研究院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“遞增階梯定價(jià)的政策評(píng)估與優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì)研究”(71603218) 國(guó)家自然科學(xué)青年項(xiàng)目“通過(guò)結(jié)構(gòu)重組、接入監(jiān)管與定價(jià)機(jī)制改革構(gòu)建中國(guó)售電側(cè)市場(chǎng)的理論與實(shí)證研究”(71403288) 重慶市人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“丘陵地區(qū)農(nóng)村資源型產(chǎn)品的配置效率與定價(jià)策略”(16SKB057)資助
【分類號(hào)】：F426.61
，

本文編號(hào)：1749789