隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化和區(qū)域化進(jìn)程的快速發(fā)展,全球各個(gè)領(lǐng)域的產(chǎn)業(yè)都在從供應(yīng)鏈和物流的優(yōu)勢(shì)中尋求效益比較。中國(guó)不僅有世界上最大的制造業(yè),而且向其他發(fā)展中國(guó)家擴(kuò)大投資。根據(jù)“一帶一路”倡議的背景,由于緬甸是連接印度洋與中國(guó)西南內(nèi)陸省份的交匯點(diǎn),因此對(duì)于中國(guó)的貿(mào)易發(fā)展來(lái)說(shuō)緬甸有著重要的戰(zhàn)略地位。此外,兩國(guó)的貿(mào)易關(guān)系隨著2010年中國(guó)-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的建立而不斷發(fā)展。根據(jù)貿(mào)易的強(qiáng)烈需求性和集裝箱化在貨物運(yùn)輸中的重要作用,有效的多式聯(lián)運(yùn)路線成為運(yùn)輸中緬貿(mào)易貨物的必要條件。為了解決這個(gè)問(wèn)題,首先,本文基于文獻(xiàn)綜述和物流行業(yè)專(zhuān)家意見(jiàn)構(gòu)建了指標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)體系。因此,成本,時(shí)間,可靠性,容量,安全性,多式聯(lián)運(yùn)模式連接效率,地緣政治和環(huán)境被認(rèn)為是影響多式聯(lián)運(yùn)路線效率的主要因素。其次,本文的重點(diǎn)是通過(guò)研究從重慶（中國(guó)）到仰光（緬甸）的實(shí)證案例研究的所有替代方案,分析40英尺高集裝箱運(yùn)輸?shù)钠邨l運(yùn)輸路線。下一步是計(jì)算標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的權(quán)重并根據(jù)不同的偏好排列運(yùn)輸路線。模糊層次分析法用于計(jì)算標(biāo)準(zhǔn)權(quán)重,TOPSIS用于評(píng)估問(wèn)題,其結(jié)果顯示了多式聯(lián)運(yùn)路線的偏好順序。采用模糊層次分析法和TOPSIS方法,結(jié)合定性和定量數(shù)據(jù),從物流服務(wù)提供商和托... 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：111 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
擴(kuò)展的摘要
abstract
CHAPTER 1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND
    1.1 Significance of Research
    1.2 Theoretical Meaning and Applied Value
    1.3 Literature Review
    1.4 The Scope of the Thesis and Contribution
CHAPTER 2 RELATED THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES
    2.1 Concept of Intermodal Transportation
    2.2 Transport Mode Characteristics
    2.3 Container Transportation
    2.4 Fuzzy Logic
    2.5 Overview of Multi Criteria Decision Making
        2.5.1 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
        2.5.2 Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP)
        2.5.3 Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)
CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORK BETWEEN CHINA ANDMYANMAR
    3.1 Trade Relation between China and Myanmar
    3.2 Current Situation of Transportation Network between China and Myanmar
        3.2.1 Road Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
        3.2.2 Inland Water Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
        3.2.3 Railway Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
        3.2.4 Sea Transportation
        3.2.5 Analysis of Transportation Modes in Myanmar
    3.3 Current Situation of China Intermodal Transportation
        3.3.1 Shanghai Port
        3.3.2 Shenzhen Port
        3.3.3 Logistics Network of Chongqing
CHAPTER 4 EVALUATION INDEXES SYSTEM FOR INTERMODALTRANSPORTATION
    4.1 Cost
    4.2 Time
    4.3 Reliability
    4.4 Capacity
    4.5 Security
    4.6 Intermodal Mode Connectivity Efficiency
    4.7 Geopolitics
    4.8 Environment
CHAPTER 5 ESTABLISHING EVALUATION MODEL OF INTERMODALTRANSPORTATION ROUTES BASED ON FAHP AND TOPSIS
    5.1 Evaluation Model Descriptions
    5.2 Procedures of Model Phase 1 based on FAHP
    5.3 Procedures of Model Phase two based on TOPSIS
CHAPTER 6 CASE STUDIES FOR ANALYSIS OF INTERMODAL ROUTES
    6.1 Analysis on Intermodal Routes from Chongqing to Yangon
    6.2 Analysis on Criteria's Weights based on FAHP Methodology
        6.2.1 Calculation of Weights
        6.2.2 Hierarchical Cluster Analysis for Group AHP
        6.2.3 Evaluation Results of Criteria's weights
    6.3 Prioritization for evaluation of Chongqing-Yangon Transport Routes based on TOPSIS
    6.4 Sensitivity Analysis by Changing Criteria Weight
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
Acknowledgements
作者簡(jiǎn)歷及攻讀碩士學(xué)位期間的科研成果



本文編號(hào)：3649964