【摘要】：市域快線站間距通常遠(yuǎn)大于常規(guī)地鐵線路,在市域快線長大區(qū)間中采用常規(guī)地鐵的故障救援模式及救援速度可能導(dǎo)致救援時間過長。為了提高市域快線長大區(qū)間故障救援效率,以廣州市規(guī)劃的首條160 km時速市域快線為例,在分析常規(guī)地鐵故障救援流程、救援速度和救援時間的基礎(chǔ)上,對市域快線故障救援速度進(jìn)行探討,進(jìn)而設(shè)計了長大區(qū)間設(shè)置渡線和設(shè)置停車線2類方案,與無配線方案在救援時間、后續(xù)堵塞列車疏散效率等關(guān)鍵指標(biāo)上進(jìn)行綜合比選,最后提出不同的區(qū)間停車線形式并進(jìn)行了對比分析。研究表明:在長大區(qū)間設(shè)置停車線的方案救援功能較好,建議在工程條件允許時優(yōu)先采用;不同的區(qū)間停車線形式各有優(yōu)劣,應(yīng)根據(jù)實際情況綜合考慮運營功能和工程規(guī)模后選擇。
[Abstract]:The distance between the stations of the municipal express line is usually much larger than that of the conventional subway line. The failure rescue mode and the rescue speed of the conventional subway in the long and long section of the urban fast line may cause the rescue time to be too long. In order to improve the efficiency of fault rescue in the long and long section of the urban fast line, taking the first 160 km per hour municipal fast line planned in Guangzhou as an example, the paper analyzes the routine subway fault rescue flow, rescue speed and rescue time. This paper probes into the speed of fault rescue of the municipal fast line, and then designs two kinds of schemes, that is, setting the crossing line and setting the stop line in the long and long section, which are compared with the scheme without wiring in the key indexes such as the rescue time and the evacuation efficiency of the subsequent blocked train, and so on. Finally, different parking lines are put forward and compared with each other. The results show that the scheme of parking line in the long and long section has better rescue function, and it is suggested that priority should be given when the project conditions permit; Different interval parking lines have their own advantages and disadvantages, which should be selected after considering the operation function and project scale comprehensively according to the actual situation.
【作者單位】： 廣州地鐵設(shè)計研究院有限公司;
【基金】：國家重點研發(fā)計劃資助(2017YFB1201204)
【分類號】：U298.6
，

本文編號：2412274