【摘要】：近十年來,國內(nèi)"PX"項目頻頻見諸于報端,成為飽受爭議的對象,甚至引發(fā)了多起群體性事件。在一些普通民眾心目中,"PX"不再是對二甲苯這個化工名詞,而是"劇毒"和"危險"的代名詞。究竟"PX"項目暗藏巨大風(fēng)險,還是安全可靠?專家對此發(fā)表怎樣的見解?有何判斷?從報紙中的專家話語文本入手,嘗試采用詹姆斯·保羅·吉(James Paul Gee)的綜合話語分析法來考察"反PX派"和"挺PX派"專家是如何實(shí)現(xiàn)話語建構(gòu)任務(wù)的,指出"專家共同體"內(nèi)部的話語之爭對PX形象的建構(gòu)作用,并通過分析、對比專家話語"修辭建構(gòu)"的實(shí)踐邏輯,結(jié)合文本產(chǎn)生的具體情景,探索話語背后的社會影響因素。
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, PX projects have been frequently reported in the newspaper, and become the object of much controversy, and even triggered many mass incidents. In the eyes of some ordinary people, "PX" is no longer a chemical term for p-xylene, but a synonym for "highly toxic" and "dangerous." Is the "PX" project potentially risky, or is it safe and reliable? What is the expert's opinion on this? What's your judgment? Starting with the text of expert discourse in newspapers, this paper attempts to use the comprehensive discourse analysis method of James Paul (James Paul Gee) to investigate how the experts of "anti-PX" and "Ting PX" have realized the task of discourse construction. This paper points out the role of the discourse controversy within the "expert Community" in constructing the image of PX, and through the analysis, compares the practical logic of the "rhetoric construction" of the expert discourse, and explores the social influence factors behind the discourse by combining the concrete situation of the text.
【作者單位】： 中國科學(xué)院大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金青年項目“爭議性科技議題的公眾參與科學(xué)傳播研究”(項目編號:16CXW018)的階段性研究成果
【分類號】：TQ086;TQ241.13

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 潘志慶;;男士潔面乳包裝的話語分析——以曼秀雷敦男士冰爽活性炭潔面乳為例[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2013年04期

，

本文編號：2375320