本文關(guān)鍵詞： 承壓類特種設(shè)備 風(fēng)險評估框架 定性/定量評估 涉氨企業(yè)　出處：《華東理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：作為上海市特種設(shè)備應(yīng)急管理平臺建設(shè)總體規(guī)劃中基礎(chǔ)風(fēng)險研究的一部分,本文針對承壓類特種設(shè)備進行了風(fēng)險管理的研究。承壓設(shè)備風(fēng)險管理能有效的辨識危險源、評估風(fēng)險,并針對不同風(fēng)險等級的企業(yè)采取措施,保證其安全運行。鑒于承壓設(shè)備數(shù)量大、危險性高,監(jiān)察力量不足等問題,本文提出了基于單臺設(shè)備風(fēng)險為基礎(chǔ)的承壓特種設(shè)備風(fēng)險管理框架和方法,為監(jiān)察單位分類監(jiān)管和應(yīng)急管理平臺建設(shè)提供技術(shù)支持。本文的主要研究內(nèi)容如下：(1)提出以單臺設(shè)備風(fēng)險(失效可能性×后果)為基礎(chǔ),企業(yè)風(fēng)險、區(qū)域風(fēng)險等為指標(biāo)的風(fēng)險評估框架。該框架包含設(shè)備狀況、安全附件、人員培訓(xùn)以及安全管理等方面的內(nèi)容,并據(jù)此框架提出了定性、定量風(fēng)險評估法。(2)定性評估法以設(shè)備運行狀態(tài)和所含介質(zhì)危險性為基礎(chǔ),借鑒篩選分析思路,結(jié)合實際情況,確立了一套從設(shè)備風(fēng)險到企業(yè)風(fēng)險的評估方法。定量評估法融合API 581中的算法,考慮設(shè)備可能發(fā)生的損傷并詳細(xì)計算,最終得到各風(fēng)險指標(biāo)的量化值。(3)各風(fēng)險指標(biāo)計算中運用了不同的數(shù)學(xué)方法來保證計算的準(zhǔn)確性。從設(shè)備風(fēng)險到區(qū)域風(fēng)險計算中,使用了疊加、最大化思想以及基于事故統(tǒng)計信息的動態(tài)權(quán)重值等方法,保證了風(fēng)險指標(biāo)的準(zhǔn)確性和動態(tài)性。(4)針對涉氨企業(yè)的特點制定了安全檢查表,并通過篩選重點檢查指標(biāo)考查涉氨企業(yè)的安全狀況,為有關(guān)部門制定監(jiān)察計劃提供依據(jù)。同時,根據(jù)涉氨企業(yè)的調(diào)研情況,確定了風(fēng)險評估中各個修正因子。(5)根據(jù)涉氨企業(yè)的危險辨識、實地調(diào)研和計算分析,提出了管道焊接修正因子Fpipeweld。使用定性方法評估BS區(qū)14家涉氨企業(yè),獲得企業(yè)風(fēng)險分布情況,分析各企業(yè)風(fēng)險并制定相應(yīng)的安全措施。此外,對于儲氨量最大的冷庫O進行定量風(fēng)險評估,掌握該企業(yè)的風(fēng)險情況,驗證兩種方法的可行性和一致性。
[Abstract]:As a part of the basic risk research in the overall planning of the emergency management platform for special equipment in Shanghai. In this paper, the research on risk management for special pressure equipment is carried out. The risk management of pressure equipment can effectively identify the risk source, assess the risk, and take measures for enterprises with different risk levels. To ensure its safe operation. In view of the large number of pressurized equipment, high risk, insufficient supervisory power and other problems, this paper puts forward a risk management framework and method of special pressure equipment based on the risk of a single equipment. The main research contents of this paper are as follows: 1) based on the risk of single equipment (failure possibility 脳 consequence), the enterprise risk is proposed. A risk assessment framework for which regional risk is an indicator. The framework includes information on equipment status, safety accessories, personnel training and safety management, and is defined accordingly. Quantitative risk assessment method. 2) the qualitative evaluation method is based on the operating state of the equipment and the risk of the medium contained in it. The method of screening and analysis is used for reference and combined with the actual situation. This paper establishes a set of evaluation methods from equipment risk to enterprise risk. Quantitative evaluation method integrates the algorithm of API 581 and considers the possible damage of equipment and calculates the damage in detail. Finally, the quantitative value of each risk index is obtained. (3) different mathematical methods are used to ensure the accuracy of the calculation in the calculation of each risk index. From the equipment risk to the regional risk calculation, the superposition is used. The idea of maximization and the dynamic weight value based on accident statistics ensure the accuracy and dynamic of the risk index. And through the screening of key inspection indicators to check the safety situation of ammonia enterprises, for the relevant departments to formulate monitoring plans. At the same time, according to the research situation of ammonia enterprises. According to the risk identification, field investigation and calculation analysis of the ammonia enterprises, each correction factor in the risk assessment is determined. The pipeline welding correction factor Fpipeweld. the qualitative method is used to evaluate 14 ammonia enterprises in BS area, and the risk distribution of the enterprises is obtained. The risk of each enterprise is analyzed and the corresponding safety measures are worked out. In addition, the risk assessment of the cold storage O with the largest ammonia storage capacity is carried out, the risk situation of the enterprise is grasped, and the feasibility and consistency of the two methods are verified.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：X924.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 盧志明;陳冰冰;高增梁;;16MnR鋼在液氨環(huán)境中的應(yīng)力腐蝕裂紋擴展研究[J];材料工程;2007年10期

2 劉春祥,蔡鳳英,談宗山;某液氨儲罐泄漏的后果分析及對策[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2004年10期

3 江書軍;丁日佳;郝素俐;;特種設(shè)備使用單位風(fēng)險評價指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建研究[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2012年07期

4 周波;許林濤;朱保赤;;在用氨制冷壓力管道定期檢驗風(fēng)險評價研究[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2013年04期

5 王曉雪;;論非政府組織在環(huán)境應(yīng)急管理體制中的作用[J];湖北成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年02期

6 柳紅衛(wèi);黃沿波;;液氨泄漏風(fēng)險評估和風(fēng)險分級方法[J];安全與環(huán)境工程;2010年01期

7 陳云榮;元海榮;許林濤;;特種設(shè)備安全評價研究進展[J];機電產(chǎn)品開發(fā)與創(chuàng)新;2012年04期

8 趙文芳,姜春明,姜巍巍,張衛(wèi)華;HAZOP分析核心技術(shù)[J];安全、健康和環(huán)境;2005年03期

9 艾志斌;陳學(xué)東;楊鐵成;胡久韶;;復(fù)雜介質(zhì)環(huán)境下承壓設(shè)備主導(dǎo)損傷機制的判定與失效可能性分析[J];壓力容器;2010年06期

10 白勤虎,吳慈生,王永民,陶賢海;芻議企業(yè)風(fēng)險管理與安全管理[J];中國安全科學(xué)學(xué)報;1998年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊振林;特種設(shè)備風(fēng)險管理研究[D];天津大學(xué);2009年

2 魯春雷;煤炭企業(yè)風(fēng)險識別、評估與防控研究[D];西安科技大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李寶巖;可接受風(fēng)險標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[D];江蘇大學(xué);2010年

2 黃媛媛;我國特種設(shè)備安全監(jiān)察體系研究[D];天津大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1449941