發(fā)布時間：2018-12-18 15:13

【摘要】：城市是人類群居生活的最高形式,是人類走向成熟和文明的標志,其各項因子都受到人類社會活動的影響。城市快速發(fā)展與擴張的同時,也面臨著各種各樣的挑戰(zhàn)和壓力。近年來凸顯的老齡化現(xiàn)象帶來的社會問題日趨緊迫,人口老齡化問題成為當前國際城市發(fā)展的一個瓶頸和討論熱點,也成為目前城市規(guī)劃與建設尤其需要注重的方面。結合老齡化社會問題對城市的宜居性進行探討,具有重要的實踐意義。而城市的宜居性評價研究是一個動態(tài)復雜的體系,宜居城市的內涵隨著整個社會形式和構成的變遷,也在慢慢產(chǎn)生著變化。 本文選取人口老齡化這一社會現(xiàn)實,通過對人口老齡化社會需求變化的分析,將這種需求或者存在的社會問題結合于城市宜居性的評價當中。在國內外相關研究的基礎上,對國內外關于城市宜居性的評價體系進行研究。運用文獻歸納法、專家意見法,以層次分析法為模型建立的基礎,從自然環(huán)境質量、經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平、社會穩(wěn)定與安全、基礎設施建設和生活便捷程度5個二級指標以及進一步細分的17個三級指標,構建出評價指標體系模型。由于近年來居住郊區(qū)化趨勢明顯,使得中心城市周邊的第二圈層城市的居住優(yōu)勢上升,第二圈層城市的區(qū)位條件比中心城區(qū)更有利于滿足老齡化社會下的老年人的人居環(huán)境和生活需求。本文選取大城市周邊的第二圈層中小城市作為宜居性評價的研究對象,通過對成都周邊第二圈層城市的現(xiàn)狀分析和實地調查,結合居民問卷調查,最后指標體系的結果表明：在成都市第二圈層的六個城市當中,溫江區(qū)最具有適宜人口老齡化生活的宜居性,其次是龍泉驛區(qū)、新都區(qū)、郫縣、雙流縣和青白江區(qū)。評價體系體現(xiàn)出來的成都市第二圈層城市發(fā)展中的問題主要是區(qū)域發(fā)展不平衡和各城市的產(chǎn)業(yè)功能定位的差異。成都市第二圈層的城市在利用本身的區(qū)位優(yōu)勢和自然資源的情況下,還要從生態(tài)環(huán)境、文化多樣、社會保障體系和統(tǒng)籌規(guī)劃等方面做出更多的努力。同時,城市的宜居性會隨著社會的發(fā)展有不一樣的目標,這就要求政策和規(guī)劃制定者能有更前瞻性的眼光和趨勢的把握能力,從而更高效合理地實現(xiàn)宜居城市的建設。
[Abstract]:City is the highest form of human social life, is the symbol of human maturity and civilization, its various factors are affected by human social activities. With the rapid development and expansion of the city, it also faces a variety of challenges and pressures. In recent years, the social problems brought by the aging phenomenon are becoming more and more urgent. The problem of population aging has become a bottleneck and a hot topic of discussion in the international urban development, and has also become a special aspect of urban planning and construction. It is of great practical significance to discuss the livability of cities in combination with the problem of aging society. The evaluation of livable city is a dynamic and complex system. The connotation of livable city is changing with the change of the whole social form and composition. This paper selects the social reality of population aging, through the analysis of the change of social demand of population aging, combines this demand or the existing social problems in the evaluation of urban livability. On the basis of relevant research at home and abroad, this paper studies the evaluation system of urban livability at home and abroad. Based on the method of literature induction, expert opinion and analytic hierarchy process (AHP), from the quality of natural environment, the level of economic development, social stability and safety, The evaluation index system model was constructed by 5 secondary indexes of infrastructure construction and convenience of life and 17 further subdivided indexes. Due to the obvious trend of residential suburbanization in recent years, the residential superiority of the second tier city around the central city has increased. The location condition of the second tier city is more favorable than the central city area to meet the living environment and living needs of the elderly in the aging society. This paper selects the second circle city around the big city as the research object of livability evaluation, through the analysis of the current situation and field investigation of the second circle city around Chengdu, combined with the residents questionnaire survey. The results of the final index system show that among the six cities in the second layer of Chengdu, Wenjiang District is the most suitable for aging population, followed by Longquanyi District, Xindu District, Pixian County, Shuangliu County and Qingbai River District. The problems in the development of the second tier city in Chengdu are mainly the imbalance of regional development and the difference of the industrial function of each city. Under the condition of utilizing its location advantage and natural resources, Chengdu's second circle city has to make more efforts in ecological environment, cultural diversity, social security system and overall planning and so on. At the same time, the livability of the city will have different goals with the development of the society, which requires policy and planners to have a more forward-looking vision and the ability to grasp the trend, so as to realize the construction of livable city more efficiently and reasonably.
【學位授予單位】：四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F126;F299.27

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 趙勇;;國內“宜居城市”概念研究綜述[J];城市問題;2007年10期

2 甄峰;鄭俊;羅紹榮;;城市宜居性評價及規(guī)劃建設途徑——以廣東清遠為例[J];城市問題;2009年10期

3 張文忠;;宜居城市的內涵及評價指標體系探討[J];城市規(guī)劃學刊;2007年03期

4 李業(yè)錦;張文忠;田山川;余建輝;;宜居城市的理論基礎和評價研究進展[J];地理科學進展;2008年03期

5 王偉武;杭州城市生活質量的定量評價[J];地理學報;2005年01期

6 董曉峰;楊保軍;;宜居城市研究進展[J];地球科學進展;2008年03期

7 譚少華;郭劍鋒;趙萬民;;城市自然環(huán)境緩解精神壓力和疲勞恢復研究進展[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2010年04期

8 顧文選;羅亞蒙;;宜居城市科學評價標準[J];北京規(guī)劃建設;2007年01期

9 楚建群;董黎明;;創(chuàng)造良好的城市宜居環(huán)境[J];北京規(guī)劃建設;2007年01期

10 祁新華;毛蔣興;程煜;范建紅;;改革開放以來我國人居環(huán)境理論研究進展[J];規(guī)劃師;2006年08期

，

本文編號：2386033