內(nèi)蒙古地區(qū)可持續(xù)發(fā)展評價研究
[Abstract]:The concept of sustainable development has been well understood and well known by the public for nearly forty years, and the research of sustainable development has been developing towards a comprehensive, dynamic, multi-angle and comprehensive direction. The quantitative evaluation of sustainable development has always been the focus and hotspot of research. The main methods include index frame method, comprehensive index method and index method. In recent years, the method of model analysis has been added. Compared with the index framework method and the model analysis method, although the comprehensive index method can only reflect the sustainable development problem in one aspect, the coverage of data and scope is limited, but the index concentration is high, the universality is better than the index system method, and the operation is simple. The results are intuitionistic and easy to compare between countries and regions. The comprehensive index evaluation method should also be applied to the ecological, economic and social indicators. Because the common development of society, economy and population environment is the main goal of human social development, the evaluation of one aspect of sustainable development alone is contrary to the principle of commonality of sustainable development, and can not reflect the whole picture of sustainable development ability. In the research of this paper, we choose the more mature evaluation index from three aspects of ecological sustainable development, economic sustainable development and social sustainable development. Choose the real progress index to measure the economic welfare in Inner Mongolia economic growth; The ecological footprint is chosen to analyze the unsustainability of the existing resources and the ecological environment, and the Gini coefficient and the human development index are chosen to show the degree of equity and stability in the social development of Inner Mongolia. Through the comparative analysis of these indicators, this paper evaluates the ability of sustainable development in Inner Mongolia, and draws the basic conclusion: the sustainable development of economy in Inner Mongolia is better, and the sustainable development of society has not reached the high level of human development. The ecological sustainable development is poor and the sustainable growth of fossil energy production is the main reason for the high ecological deficit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F127
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張志強,程國棟,徐中民;可持續(xù)發(fā)展評估指標(biāo)、方法及應(yīng)用研究[J];冰川凍土;2002年04期
2 羅海波;張宏飛;;基于生態(tài)足跡模型的內(nèi)蒙古可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究[J];北方經(jīng)濟;2009年08期
3 汪毅霖;;人類發(fā)展指數(shù)測度方法的改進路徑與方向——基于HDR2010和中國經(jīng)驗分析的思考[J];西部論壇;2011年04期
4 張錦高,李忠武;可持續(xù)發(fā)展定量研究方法綜述[J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年06期
5 熊德國,鮮學(xué)福,姜永東;生態(tài)足跡理論在區(qū)域可持續(xù)發(fā)展評價中的應(yīng)用及改進[J];地理科學(xué)進展;2003年06期
6 李鶴;張平宇;程葉青;;脆弱性的概念及其評價方法[J];地理科學(xué)進展;2008年02期
7 張志強,孫成權(quán),程國棟,牛文元;可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究:進展與趨向[J];地球科學(xué)進展;1999年06期
8 徐中民,張志強,程國棟;當(dāng)代生態(tài)經(jīng)濟的綜合研究綜述[J];地球科學(xué)進展;2000年06期
9 姜林;;環(huán)境政策的綜合影響評價模型系統(tǒng)及應(yīng)用[J];環(huán)境科學(xué);2006年05期
10 鄧毅;城市設(shè)計的生態(tài)學(xué)方法初探──歷史文化名城的可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究[J];華中建筑;1999年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 魏虹;五大牧區(qū)草畜業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化與可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力建設(shè)[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2005年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 姜楠;混合基尼系數(shù)的計算及其非參數(shù)估計分析[D];首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2011年
,本文編號:2350238
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2350238.html