項目后評價在新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)中的應用研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-12 18:04
【摘要】：項目后評價作為提高項目決策科學化水平,改進項目管理和提高投資效益的有效手段,早已得到世界各國和國際金融組織越來越廣泛的重視與應用。但由于受到各方面因素的制約,項目后評價在新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)中推進緩慢。 本研究立足新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)現有資源條件,建立了一套經過科學論證和實證檢驗的、適用于新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)的項目后評價指標體系和后評價方法。在深入挖掘新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)項目管理水平和中央財政資金使用效率低下原因的基礎上,完成的主要研究工作如下：1、結合新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)項目管理實際,對新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)的項目后評價概念、意義、原則、內容、方法、指標體系等進行了概述。2、從項目經濟后評價、過程后評價、影響后評價、可持續(xù)性后評價4個方面初步構建了包含10個二級指標、26個三級指標的項目后評價指標體系。根據專家調查結果分析了項目后評價指標的合理性,并對初步構建的項目后評價指標體系進行了修正。利用Statistical Package for the Social Science Version20對項目后評價指標重要性專家調查結果進行統(tǒng)計分析,根據統(tǒng)計分析結果對項目后評價指標體系的結構進行驗證性的因子分析和信度檢驗。3、利用項目后評價指標體系中的26個三級指標,對新疆XX縣“以工代賑”項目進行后評價。根據項目后評價指標相對重要性專家調查結果,用層次分析法確定項目后評價各指標權重；用基于模糊數學的綜合評價方法對新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)的專家打分進行處理,得到綜合評價結果；根據最大隸屬度原則,對項目綜合評價結果進行分析。項目后評價定性分析與定量分析的結果對比表明了所建項目后評價指標體系和項目后評價方法的合理性和實用性。 本研究對于新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)開展項目后評價,提高新疆基層發(fā)展改革系統(tǒng)項目管理水平和中央財政資金使用效率具有實際應用價值。
[Abstract]:As an effective means to improve the scientific level of project decision-making, improve project management and improve investment efficiency, post-project evaluation has been paid more and more attention and application by countries and international financial organizations all over the world. However, due to the constraints of various factors, the post-project evaluation in Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system is slow to advance. Based on the existing resource conditions of Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system, this study has established a set of post-evaluation index system and post-evaluation method suitable for Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system after scientific demonstration and empirical test. On the basis of digging deeply into the reasons for the low project management level of the grass-roots development reform system in Xinjiang and the inefficient use of the central financial funds, the main research work completed is as follows: 1, combined with the actual project management of the grass-roots development reform system in Xinjiang, This paper summarizes the concept, significance, principle, content, method, index system and so on of the post-project evaluation of Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system, from the aspects of post-evaluation of project economy, post-evaluation of process, post-evaluation of impact, etc. In the four aspects of sustainability post-evaluation, a project post-evaluation index system consisting of 10 secondary indicators and 26 third-level indexes was constructed. According to the results of the expert investigation, the rationality of the post-project evaluation index is analyzed, and the preliminary construction of the post-project evaluation index system is revised. Using Statistical Package for the Social Science Version20 to analyze the results of the expert survey on the importance of the project post-evaluation index, According to the results of statistical analysis, the structure of the project post-evaluation index system was verified by factor analysis and reliability test. The post-evaluation was carried out by using 26 third-level indexes in the post-project evaluation index system of XX County in Xinjiang. According to the results of the expert investigation on the relative importance of the post-project evaluation index, the weight of each index of the post-project evaluation is determined by the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the comprehensive evaluation method based on fuzzy mathematics is used to deal with the expert score of the grass-roots development reform system in Xinjiang. According to the principle of maximum membership degree, the comprehensive evaluation results of the project are analyzed. The results of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis show the rationality and practicability of the index system and the method of post-evaluation. This research has practical application value for carrying out project post-evaluation of Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system, improving project management level of Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system and using efficiency of central finance funds.
【學位授予單位】：中國科學院大學(工程管理與信息技術學院)
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F127
本文編號：2179866
[Abstract]:As an effective means to improve the scientific level of project decision-making, improve project management and improve investment efficiency, post-project evaluation has been paid more and more attention and application by countries and international financial organizations all over the world. However, due to the constraints of various factors, the post-project evaluation in Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system is slow to advance. Based on the existing resource conditions of Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system, this study has established a set of post-evaluation index system and post-evaluation method suitable for Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system after scientific demonstration and empirical test. On the basis of digging deeply into the reasons for the low project management level of the grass-roots development reform system in Xinjiang and the inefficient use of the central financial funds, the main research work completed is as follows: 1, combined with the actual project management of the grass-roots development reform system in Xinjiang, This paper summarizes the concept, significance, principle, content, method, index system and so on of the post-project evaluation of Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system, from the aspects of post-evaluation of project economy, post-evaluation of process, post-evaluation of impact, etc. In the four aspects of sustainability post-evaluation, a project post-evaluation index system consisting of 10 secondary indicators and 26 third-level indexes was constructed. According to the results of the expert investigation, the rationality of the post-project evaluation index is analyzed, and the preliminary construction of the post-project evaluation index system is revised. Using Statistical Package for the Social Science Version20 to analyze the results of the expert survey on the importance of the project post-evaluation index, According to the results of statistical analysis, the structure of the project post-evaluation index system was verified by factor analysis and reliability test. The post-evaluation was carried out by using 26 third-level indexes in the post-project evaluation index system of XX County in Xinjiang. According to the results of the expert investigation on the relative importance of the post-project evaluation index, the weight of each index of the post-project evaluation is determined by the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the comprehensive evaluation method based on fuzzy mathematics is used to deal with the expert score of the grass-roots development reform system in Xinjiang. According to the principle of maximum membership degree, the comprehensive evaluation results of the project are analyzed. The results of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis show the rationality and practicability of the index system and the method of post-evaluation. This research has practical application value for carrying out project post-evaluation of Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system, improving project management level of Xinjiang grass-roots development reform system and using efficiency of central finance funds.
【學位授予單位】：中國科學院大學(工程管理與信息技術學院)
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F127
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前6條
1 王明濤;多指標綜合評價中權系數確定的一種綜合分析方法[J];系統(tǒng)工程;1999年02期
2 張欣莉,王順久,丁晶;建筑工程項目綜合評價的新方法及其應用[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2002年02期
3 楊曉春;苑紅;張映強;;我國投資項目后評價發(fā)展歷程及趨勢分析[J];中國工程咨詢;2011年08期
4 李善波;時現;;論政府投資項目后評價組織體系的構建[J];工業(yè)技術經濟;2008年11期
5 姚光業(yè);我國開展項目后評價狀況及前景分析[J];新視野;2003年01期
6 胡芳;唐仲平;黃文杰;;項目后評價方法綜述[J];中國電力教育;2005年S3期
，本文編號：2179866
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2179866.html
最近更新
教材專著
