【摘要】：空間相互作用是人文地理學(xué)的經(jīng)典研究議題,是經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系的機(jī)制所在,服務(wù)業(yè)空間相互作用研究則可以明晰區(qū)域服務(wù)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系。本文以此為切入點(diǎn),運(yùn)用分形理論探討京津冀都市圈服務(wù)業(yè)的演化特征,借助引力模型、城市流模型量化分析京津冀都市圈服務(wù)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系強(qiáng)度格局,同時(shí)城市流模型還能進(jìn)一步判定京津冀都市圈服務(wù)業(yè)的對(duì)外聯(lián)系結(jié)構(gòu)特征及服務(wù)職能特征；運(yùn)用地緣經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系模型,判定京津冀都市圈各城市服務(wù)業(yè)的競(jìng)合關(guān)系；最后簡(jiǎn)要提出了相關(guān)優(yōu)化服務(wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系的相關(guān)對(duì)策。研究結(jié)論表明： (1)京津冀都市圈服務(wù)業(yè)規(guī)模結(jié)構(gòu)并不成熟,近十年來服務(wù)業(yè)集聚趨勢(shì)明顯,與理想最優(yōu)分布仍有差距。 (2)京津冀都市圈外圈層城市之間聯(lián)系強(qiáng)度仍然相對(duì)較小,北京與廊坊的聯(lián)系強(qiáng)度大幅增加,內(nèi)圈層北京、天津及廊坊形成服務(wù)業(yè)聯(lián)系的“強(qiáng)三角”,都市圈內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系的主要方向仍為北京—天津。 (3)京津冀都市圈服務(wù)業(yè)外向服務(wù)功能高度集聚于區(qū)域中心城市,中心城市外向功能向知識(shí)密集型和技術(shù)密集型躍遷,服務(wù)業(yè)外向程度進(jìn)一步加深。 (4)都市圈各城市整體服務(wù)職能在不斷突出,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)職能在強(qiáng)化,消費(fèi)性服務(wù)職能弱化,同時(shí),生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)分工在深化,其中信息傳輸、計(jì)算機(jī)服務(wù)和軟件業(yè)分工程度最深。 (5)都市圈服務(wù)業(yè)地緣經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系整體格局向競(jìng)爭(zhēng)型關(guān)系演進(jìn)。各城市間的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)由較明確的競(jìng)合關(guān)系逐漸演變?yōu)楦?jìng)爭(zhēng)與互補(bǔ)不確定型關(guān)系;服務(wù)業(yè)高端人力資本地緣關(guān)系整體演化趨勢(shì)向競(jìng)爭(zhēng)型關(guān)系演化,強(qiáng)互補(bǔ)型城市也在增加；金融資本配置效率地緣經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系向強(qiáng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)型和強(qiáng)互補(bǔ)型演化。
[Abstract]:Spatial interaction is the classical research topic of human geography and the mechanism of economic connection, while the spatial interaction of service industry can clarify the regional service industry economic connection. This paper uses fractal theory to discuss the evolution characteristics of service industry in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area. With the help of gravity model and city flow model, the paper analyzes quantitatively the pattern of economic connection intensity of service industry in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area. At the same time, the urban flow model can further determine the characteristics of the service industry's external connection structure and service function in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area, and use the geo-economic relationship model to judge the competing relationship of the various urban service industries in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area. Finally, the paper briefly puts forward the relevant countermeasures to optimize the economic connection of service. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the scale structure of service industry in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area is not mature, and the trend of service industry agglomeration is obvious in the last ten years. There is still a gap between the optimal distribution and the ideal distribution. (2) the intensity of connection between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei metropolitan area is still relatively small, and the connection intensity between Beijing and Langfang increases significantly. Tianjin and Langfang form a "strong triangle" of service links, and the main direction of economic links within the metropolitan area is still Beijing-Tianjin. (3) the service outward service functions of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan area are highly concentrated in regional central cities. The outward function of central city changes to knowledge-intensive and technology-intensive, and the extroversion of service industry further deepens. (4) the whole service function of each city in metropolitan area is constantly prominent, and the function of productive service is being strengthened. At the same time, the division of labor in producer services is deepening, in which information transmission, The division of labor between computer service and software industry is the deepest. (5) the overall pattern of geo-economic relationship in metropolitan service industry evolves to competitive relationship. The industrial structure of different cities has gradually evolved from a clear relationship of competition and cooperation to a relationship of competition and complementary uncertainty, the overall evolution trend of the geographical relationship of high-end human capital in the service industry has changed to a competitive relationship, and the strong complementary city is also increasing. The geo-economic relationship of financial capital allocation efficiency evolves to strong competition and strong complementarity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳彥光;;空間相互作用模型的形式、量綱和局域性問題探討[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2009年02期

2 何炳華;空間相互作用與購物中心建設(shè)規(guī)模的確定[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年07期

3 江進(jìn)德;趙雪雁;張方圓;;安徽省合肥和蕪湖市對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系量與地緣經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系匹配分析[J];長(zhǎng)江流域資源與環(huán)境;2012年02期

4 李冠霖,辛紅;我國第三產(chǎn)業(yè)比重國際比較的陷阱與出路[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年02期

5 王欣;吳殿廷;王紅強(qiáng);;城市間經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系的定量計(jì)算[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2006年03期

6 張亞明;李新華;唐朝生;;競(jìng)合視域下京津冀區(qū)域地緣經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系測(cè)度分析[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2012年05期

7 周一星;主要經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系方向論[J];城市規(guī)劃;1998年02期

8 朱英明;我國城市群區(qū)域聯(lián)系發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];城市問題;2001年06期

9 李晉紅;;寧夏沿黃城市帶城市間經(jīng)濟(jì)地緣關(guān)系分析——以銀川市為基準(zhǔn)[J];城市問題;2010年11期

10 雷小清;;信息化背景下的服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2006年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王士君;城市相互作用與整合發(fā)展的理論和實(shí)證研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2003年

2 姜博;遼寧中部城市群空間聯(lián)系研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫繼瓊;成渝經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)城市體系特征與城市體系優(yōu)化戰(zhàn)略研究[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2152887