國民幸福度量方法比較與應(yīng)用研究
[Abstract]:Well-being is a subjective psychological experience. In early psychology, the main research objects in the fields of individual well-being, ethics, sociology and so on are the individual subjective well-being. Statistics is from the overall, comprehensive point of view of well-being, that is, overall well-being. This can be reflected by constructing subjective and objective index system and finally measured by national happiness index. In recent years, the issue of national happiness has become a hot issue, scholars, national organizations, research institutions have published a variety of "happiness" rankings, these "rankings" mostly in the order of "national happiness index". However, these "happiness" rankings are not comparable, some are contradictory or even "fight." This shows that the study of overall national happiness is not a simple calculation of the "index" problem, but a problem that needs to be seriously explored from the statistical theory and method. Therefore, this article carries on the comparative research from the following aspects by the logic and the progressive way: first, the individual well-being data collection method comparison research, the second is the overall national well-being index and the computation method comparison research; The third is the deep research on the influencing factors of the overall well-being, pointing out that the deep research on the national happiness should be based on the analysis of the influencing factors behind the index. The characteristics and contribution of this paper are mainly reflected in the latter two aspects, and the comparison and selection of the measurement methods of the overall national well-being. This paper traces the process of national happiness research and studies the statistical stage of national happiness in China. In the empirical aspect, taking the urban residents of Guangzhou as the object of investigation, the author mainly discusses the problem of national happiness by using the more ideal and feasible measurement method after the selection of the best. It aims to provide a more operational and feasible measurement method and research path for national happiness research, and to provide true and credible information for government and institutional decision-making. To measure the sustainable development of macroeconomic and the process of building a happy country harmonious society to provide a practical and reliable means of research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣東商學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F126;F224
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳惠雄;吳麗民;;國民快樂指數(shù)調(diào)查量表設(shè)計的理論機(jī)理、結(jié)構(gòu)與測量學(xué)特性分析[J];財經(jīng)論叢(浙江財經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報);2006年05期
2 吉楠;李幼穗;;《大學(xué)生主觀幸福感量表》的編制[J];心理與行為研究;2006年01期
3 林洪;李玉萍;;國民幸?傊(GNH)的啟示與國民幸福研究[J];當(dāng)代財經(jīng);2007年05期
4 王慧紅;陳楠;;中國幸福指數(shù)的構(gòu)建[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2008年06期
5 楊作毅;;北京居民幸福指數(shù)的調(diào)查與分析[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2008年05期
6 張會平;;基于HP濾波視角的國民幸福指數(shù)的波動分析[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2012年04期
7 何躍;王猛;;基于灰色關(guān)聯(lián)與Ward系統(tǒng)聚類的國民幸福評價[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2012年05期
8 莊連平;李晶;;基于相關(guān)性分析的廣義國民幸福指數(shù)的構(gòu)建[J];統(tǒng)計教育;2008年08期
9 鐘永豪,林洪,任曉陽;國民幸福指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計[J];統(tǒng)計與預(yù)測;2001年06期
10 林洪;孫求華;;中國國民幸福統(tǒng)計研究十年簡史[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2013年01期
本文編號:2122264
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2122264.html