本文選題：NRCA + 模型�。� 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來，我國沿海地區(qū)的海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展速度非常快，從十一屆三中全會以前僅有的海洋漁業(yè)、海洋鹽業(yè)和交通運(yùn)輸業(yè)三大傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)，到20世界90年代的海洋油氣業(yè)、旅游業(yè)、海洋礦業(yè)的發(fā)展，接著到21世紀(jì)海洋新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的興起，海洋資源經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)業(yè)對國家經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會發(fā)展的貢獻(xiàn)力度逐變大，但是沿海各地區(qū)海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的空間布局不合理，資源配置能力差，導(dǎo)致各省市的海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力匹配度差，因此，一定的程度上造成了各省市的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的差距。 本文從競爭優(yōu)勢和比較優(yōu)勢相結(jié)合的新思維對海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力進(jìn)行評價分析，利用沿海地區(qū)11個省市2006~2010年相關(guān)的數(shù)據(jù)，采用層次分析法和NRCA模型對沿海省市的海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力進(jìn)行綜合評價。計算結(jié)果表明，，沿海省市競爭優(yōu)勢可以分為強(qiáng)、中、弱競爭優(yōu)勢三類，而在比較優(yōu)勢方面，則可以分為在區(qū)位、環(huán)境、區(qū)位－資源比較優(yōu)勢三類。采用Fuzzy ISODATA聚類模型對競爭優(yōu)勢和比較優(yōu)勢進(jìn)行分類。結(jié)果：山東和廣東兩屬于強(qiáng)競爭優(yōu)勢—區(qū)位、資源比較優(yōu)勢區(qū)；上海屬于強(qiáng)競爭優(yōu)勢—區(qū)位比較優(yōu)勢區(qū)；天津和浙江屬于中競爭優(yōu)勢—區(qū)位比較優(yōu)勢區(qū)；遼寧和江蘇屬于中競爭優(yōu)勢—區(qū)位、資源比較優(yōu)勢區(qū)；福建省屬于中競爭優(yōu)勢—環(huán)境比較優(yōu)勢區(qū)；廣西和海南省屬于弱競爭優(yōu)勢—環(huán)境比較優(yōu)勢區(qū)；河北省屬于弱競爭優(yōu)勢—區(qū)位比較優(yōu)勢區(qū)。最后對各省市海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力及其培育途徑進(jìn)行分析。研究成果對于豐富我國海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力評價理論具有一定的應(yīng)用價值與理論意義，對于提高我國海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)的競爭力、促進(jìn)沿海地區(qū)海洋資源的優(yōu)化與產(chǎn)業(yè)布局的調(diào)整具有一定的指導(dǎo)意義。 本文主要的研究成果與結(jié)論如下： 1）基于對產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力內(nèi)涵的理解，認(rèn)為海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力由競爭優(yōu)勢和比較優(yōu)勢兩個基本要素組成，其中競爭優(yōu)勢與資源利用有關(guān)，比較優(yōu)勢與資源稟賦有關(guān)。 2）聚類模型進(jìn)行優(yōu)勢類型分類，分類結(jié)果基本上能夠反映研究區(qū)實(shí)際情況，與國家相關(guān)海洋發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略基本吻合，說明采用AHP-NRCA模型進(jìn)行海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力評價是可行的，研究成果在一定程度上豐富了海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力評價理論。 3）各地區(qū)應(yīng)根據(jù)實(shí)際情況，充分發(fā)揮自身的比較優(yōu)勢和競爭優(yōu)勢，科學(xué)配置海洋資源，合理調(diào)整產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)布局，積極培植主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)，帶動海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展，對于提高沿海地區(qū)海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力具有一定的指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the marine industry in the coastal areas of our country has developed very fast. From the three traditional industries of marine fishery, marine salt industry and transportation industry, which were only before the third Plenary session of the Eleventh Central Committee, to the offshore oil and gas industry in the 1990s. With the development of tourism and marine mining, and then with the rising of new marine industries in the 21st century, the contribution of marine resources economic industries to the national economic and social development has increased gradually, but the spatial distribution of marine industry development in coastal areas is unreasonable. The poor resource allocation ability leads to the poor matching degree of the marine industry competitiveness of the provinces and cities, so to a certain extent, it causes the disparity of the economic development of the provinces and cities. Based on the new thinking of combining competitive advantage with comparative advantage, this paper evaluates and analyzes the competitiveness of marine industry, and makes use of the relevant data of 11 provinces and cities in coastal areas from 2006 to 2010. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and NRCA model are used to evaluate the competitiveness of marine industry in coastal provinces and cities. The results show that the competitive advantages of coastal provinces and cities can be divided into three categories: strong, medium and weak competitive advantages, while in terms of comparative advantages, they can be divided into three categories: location, environment and location-resources comparative advantage. Fuzzy ISODATA clustering model is used to classify competitive advantage and comparative advantage. Results: Shandong and Guangdong belong to strong competitive advantage-location, resources comparative advantage area, Shanghai belongs to strong competition advantage-location comparative advantage area, Tianjin and Zhejiang belong to middle competition advantage-location comparative advantage area; Liaoning and Jiangsu belong to middle competitive advantage-location, resources comparative advantage area, Fujian province belongs to middle competition advantage-environment comparative advantage area, Guangxi and Hainan province belong to weak competition advantage-environment comparative advantage area; Hebei Province belongs to the weak competitive advantage-location comparative advantage area. Finally, the paper analyzes the competitiveness and cultivation of marine industry in various provinces and cities. The research results have certain applied value and theoretical significance to enrich the evaluation theory of China's marine industry competitiveness, and to improve the competitiveness of our country's marine industry. It is of guiding significance to promote the optimization of marine resources and the adjustment of industrial layout in coastal areas. The main research results and conclusions are as follows: 1) based on the understanding of the connotation of industrial competitiveness, it is considered that the competitiveness of marine industry is composed of two basic elements: competitive advantage and comparative advantage, among which competitive advantage is related to the utilization of resources, and comparative advantage is related to resource endowment. 2) the clustering model classifies the dominant types, and the classification results can basically reflect the actual situation of the study area, which is basically consistent with the national marine development strategy. It shows that it is feasible to use the AHP-NRCA model to evaluate the competitiveness of marine industry. To some extent, the research results enrich the evaluation theory of marine industry competitiveness. 3) according to the actual situation, all regions should give full play to their comparative and competitive advantages, scientifically allocate marine resources, rationally adjust the layout of industrial structure, actively cultivate leading industries, and promote the development of marine industries. It has certain guiding significance for improving the competitiveness of marine industry in coastal areas.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：P74;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 康小明,向勇;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群與文化產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力的提升[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

2 孫才志,孫炳雙,林旭,韓鳳成;區(qū)域水資源開發(fā)模式評價指標(biāo)體系研究——以松嫩盆地為例[J];長春科技大學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年01期

3 劉國亮,薛欣欣;比較優(yōu)勢、競爭優(yōu)勢與區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力評價——以山東省制造業(yè)為例[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年03期

4 孫才志;孫語桐;;基于NRCA模型的遼寧省水資源利用比較優(yōu)勢分析[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2010年02期

5 范斐;孫才志;;遼寧省海洋經(jīng)濟(jì)與陸域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)同發(fā)展研究[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2011年02期

6 劉曙光;姜旭朝;;中國海洋經(jīng)濟(jì)研究30年：回顧與展望[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年11期

7 鄭傳均;麻丹華;;基于SCP與鉆石模型的產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力理論模型[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2007年13期

8 劉大海;陳燁;邵桂蘭;王晶;;區(qū)域海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力評估理論與實(shí)證研究[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2011年07期

9 王圣;張燕歌;;山東海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力評估體系的構(gòu)建[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2011年07期

10 徐質(zhì)斌;海洋經(jīng)濟(jì)與海洋經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué)[J];海洋科學(xué);1995年02期

本文編號：1969792