本文選題：產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚 + 外商直接投資��； 參考：《貴州財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著改革開放的不斷深入，我國經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展的速度越來越快，，同時(shí)，選擇在我國進(jìn)行投資的外商也越來越多，目前，我國幾乎所有經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域都有外商直接投資的參與，可以說，如果沒有改革開放，沒有外商在中國的投資，我國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展就不會(huì)取得現(xiàn)在的成就。值得注意的是，在吸引外商投資上，我國東部發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)具有絕對優(yōu)勢。根據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒數(shù)據(jù)分析，我國80%以上外商投資集中在東部地區(qū)，由此可見，我國東部崛起在一定程度上得益于外商直接投資的促進(jìn)作用。伴隨外商直接投資在東部地區(qū)的集聚，一批批各具特色的產(chǎn)業(yè)集群相繼涌現(xiàn)，如，廣東東莞的IT產(chǎn)業(yè)集群、浙江杭州的裝備制造產(chǎn)業(yè)集群、江蘇宜興的官林電纜產(chǎn)業(yè)集群等已經(jīng)成為支撐這些區(qū)域競爭的核心力量，產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚已經(jīng)成為我國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要內(nèi)容。理論和實(shí)踐上證明，產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚和外商直接投資之間可以相互促進(jìn)發(fā)展。 貴州省作為我國西部欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)，其吸引和利用外商直接投資的數(shù)量遠(yuǎn)不及東部發(fā)達(dá)省份，雖然近幾年，引進(jìn)和利用外資工作取得了積極進(jìn)展，外商投資結(jié)構(gòu)也有所優(yōu)化，但總體看來，外資在經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)中的比重依然偏小，對產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的推動(dòng)作用并不是很顯著，使得貴州省的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚一直在全國處于低端水平。當(dāng)前，中西部地區(qū)承接產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的速度正在加快，貴州省應(yīng)該也必須抓住這次機(jī)遇，一馬當(dāng)先，成為外商新的投資集中地，在完成產(chǎn)業(yè)集中、集聚、集約發(fā)展的同時(shí)，實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的飛躍。為此，本文重點(diǎn)探討了貴州產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與外商直接投資的關(guān)系，以及如何實(shí)現(xiàn)和強(qiáng)化二者的良性互動(dòng)，圍繞這一主題，本文共分為七個(gè)部分，第一部分是緒論，首先簡單介紹了選題背景和研究意義，然后梳理歸納了相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)，并對其進(jìn)行簡要述評，最后指出創(chuàng)新之處與不足。第二部分對支撐本研究的相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行簡要總結(jié)，包括產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的涵義、衡量指標(biāo)及相關(guān)理論，外商直接投資的涵義及相關(guān)理論。第三部分闡述了產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚對外商直接投資的引致作用，外商直接投資對產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的推動(dòng)作用，并在此基礎(chǔ)上形成二者的互動(dòng)機(jī)制圖。第四部分概括了貴州產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚形成的原因，并用大量數(shù)據(jù)詳細(xì)介紹了貴州省產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的現(xiàn)狀和貴州省實(shí)際利用外商直接投資的現(xiàn)狀，這一部分是第五章實(shí)證分析的基礎(chǔ)。第五部分是本文研究的重點(diǎn)，從實(shí)證角度考察了貴州省產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與外商直接投資的關(guān)系。首先確定了衡量貴州省產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的指標(biāo)—集聚度系數(shù)，然后選取利用外商直接投資最多的制造業(yè)作為分析對象，并運(yùn)用集聚度系數(shù)考察了制造業(yè)21個(gè)行業(yè)的集聚程度，發(fā)現(xiàn)飲料制造業(yè)（包括酒類）集聚發(fā)展的趨勢最明顯，故被選為實(shí)證分析的樣本。接著采用ADF檢驗(yàn)、協(xié)整檢驗(yàn)和格蘭杰檢驗(yàn)等計(jì)量方法對飲料制造業(yè)（包括酒類）和外商直接投資的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)研究，發(fā)現(xiàn)二者之間存在互動(dòng)關(guān)系。第六部分根據(jù)實(shí)證分析結(jié)果得出結(jié)論，并提出了相應(yīng)的政策建議。 本文是一篇實(shí)證性文章，通過實(shí)證分析證明了貴州省產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與外商直接投資之間存在互動(dòng)關(guān)系，這是本文探索的新成果。然而，由于資源有限，一些重要數(shù)據(jù)沒有搜集到，如貴州省飲料制造業(yè)（包括酒類）實(shí)際利用的外商直接投資額，而本文選用制造業(yè)實(shí)際利用的外商直接投資額作為替代數(shù)據(jù)，為此，實(shí)證結(jié)果有待以后做進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證，從而提出更加具有針對性的政策建議。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of reform and opening up, China's economic and social development is faster and faster. At the same time, there are more and more foreign investors who choose to invest in our country. At present, almost all the economic fields of our country have the participation of foreign direct investment. If there is no reform and opening, there is no foreign investment in China, the economic development of our country will be It is worth noting that the eastern developed regions have absolute advantages in attracting foreign investment. According to the statistical yearbook data, more than 80% of the foreign investment in China is concentrated in the eastern region. Thus, the rise of the eastern part of our country is to some extent benefited from the promotion of foreign direct investment. The agglomeration of direct investment in the eastern region, a batch of industrial clusters with various characteristics have emerged. For example, the IT industrial cluster in Dongguan, Guangdong, the equipment manufacturing cluster in Hangzhou, Zhejiang and Hangzhou, and the industrial cluster of the Guan Lin cable industry in Yixing, Jiangsu have become the core strength to support the regional competition, and the industrial agglomeration has become the economic development of our country. Theoretically and practically, it is proved that industrial agglomeration and foreign direct investment can promote each other's development.
As the underdeveloped region of the west of China, Guizhou province is far less than the eastern developed province. Although in recent years, the introduction and utilization of foreign investment have made positive progress and the structure of foreign investment has been optimized. However, in general, the proportion of foreign investment in the economic structure is still small and the industrial agglomeration is pushed. The use of the movement is not very significant, making the industrial agglomeration in Guizhou at a low level in the whole country. At present, the speed of undertaking industrial transfer in the central and western regions is accelerating. Guizhou province should also seize this opportunity to become a new investment concentration of foreign investors, while completing industrial concentration, agglomeration and intensive development. This paper focuses on the relationship between industrial agglomeration and foreign direct investment in Guizhou, and how to realize and strengthen the positive interaction between the two. This article is divided into seven parts around this topic. The first part is the introduction. First, it introduces the background and significance of the topic, and then combs and summarizes the relevant literature. The second part gives a brief summary of the relevant theories supporting this study, including the connotation of industrial agglomeration, the measurement index and related theories, the meaning of foreign direct investment and the related theories. The third part expounds the effect of industrial agglomeration on foreign direct investment. On the basis of the promotion of direct investment on industrial agglomeration and the formation of the interaction mechanism of the two parties on this basis, the fourth part summarizes the causes of the formation of industrial agglomeration in Guizhou, and introduces the status of industrial agglomeration in Guizhou province and the actual utilization of foreign direct investment in Guizhou province with a large number of data. This part is the fifth chapter of the empirical analysis. The fifth part is the focus of this study. The relationship between industrial agglomeration and foreign direct investment in Guizhou province is examined from an empirical point of view. First, the index of industrial agglomeration in Guizhou province is determined, and the agglomeration degree coefficient is measured. Then the manufacturing industry with the most foreign direct investment is selected as the analysis object and the agglomeration degree coefficient is used to investigate. The concentration of 21 industries in the manufacturing industry has been found to be the most obvious trend in the development of the beverage manufacturing industry (including wine). Therefore, it is selected as a sample of empirical analysis. Then ADF test, co integration test and Grainger test have been used to systematically study the relationship between beverage manufacturing industry (including alcohol) and foreign direct investment, and two The sixth part draws conclusions based on the results of empirical analysis, and puts forward corresponding policy recommendations.
This article is an empirical article which proves that there is an interactive relationship between industrial agglomeration and foreign direct investment in Guizhou province. This is a new achievement in this paper. However, some important data are not collected because of the limited resources, such as the actual foreign direct investment in the beverage manufacturing industry of Guizhou province (including wine), In this paper, the actual use of foreign direct investment in the manufacturing industry is used as an alternative data. For this reason, the empirical results need to be further verified in the future, so as to put forward more pertinent policy recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F127;F832.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉斯敖;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚測度方法的研究綜述[J];商業(yè)研究;2008年11期

2 楊之強(qiáng);;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群社會(huì)資本的正效應(yīng)研究[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2010年05期

3 賀燦飛;劉洋;;產(chǎn)業(yè)地理集聚與外商直接投資產(chǎn)業(yè)分布——以北京市制造業(yè)為例[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2006年12期

4 呂宏芬;王君;;外商直接投資對浙江省產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展的效應(yīng)分析[J];國際商務(wù)(對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年04期

5 謝岷;國際生產(chǎn)折衷理論述評[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;1987年05期

6 熊永芳;吳莉云;;江浙兩省FDI與高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚互動(dòng)關(guān)系的比較研究[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年23期

7 李娟;王菲;;外商直接投資與產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的形成——基于中國的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2011年05期

8 荊榮梅;陳功德;;外商直接投資與產(chǎn)業(yè)集群互動(dòng)關(guān)系研究——基于山東省的實(shí)證分析[J];價(jià)值工程;2009年05期

9 郭文強(qiáng);張澤文;張少杰;李燕;;對外直接投資理論研究綜述[J];科技管理研究;2006年05期

10 羅勇,曹麗莉;中國制造業(yè)集聚程度變動(dòng)趨勢實(shí)證研究[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2005年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李晗斌;FDI對中國工業(yè)集聚的影響研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 劉安;我國產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與外商直接投資關(guān)系研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2005年

2 劉婷;基于跨國公司的FDI與產(chǎn)業(yè)集群互動(dòng)機(jī)制研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

3 洪亮;湖北省外商直接投資與產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚相互關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

4 王靜;促進(jìn)貴州地區(qū)循環(huán)產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展的相關(guān)機(jī)制研究[D];貴州財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院;2010年

5 袁滿;外商直接投資與高科技產(chǎn)業(yè)集群互動(dòng)機(jī)制的研究[D];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1917974