本文選題：鄱陽湖地區(qū) + 生態(tài)環(huán)境��； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：鄱陽湖是中國最大的淡水湖泊,鄱陽湖生態(tài)經(jīng)濟區(qū)自被國家批復(fù)成立以來逐漸成為江西省綜合實力最強和發(fā)展?jié)摿ψ畲蟮牡貐^(qū)。同時該區(qū)域也具有發(fā)展生態(tài)經(jīng)濟、促進生態(tài)與經(jīng)濟協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的良好條件。然而,伴隨著城市化和經(jīng)濟快速發(fā)展的進程,鄱陽湖地區(qū)城市經(jīng)濟增長對生態(tài)環(huán)境的影響越來越突出�；谶@種背景,本文對鄱陽湖地區(qū)城市生態(tài)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟發(fā)展進行了實證研究。研究的具體內(nèi)容包括：①以鄱陽湖地區(qū)城市為研究對象,建立了經(jīng)濟發(fā)展系統(tǒng)與生態(tài)環(huán)境系統(tǒng)的綜合評價指標體系；利用主成分分析法和隸屬度函數(shù)法,對鄱陽湖地區(qū)6個城市(南昌、景德鎮(zhèn)、九江、新余、鷹潭、撫州)10年(2001-2010年)的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平和生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量進行了綜合評價；給出生態(tài)環(huán)境和經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的耦合度與耦合協(xié)調(diào)度的計算模型,據(jù)此劃分出耦合協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展類型。②采用生態(tài)足跡理論方法對鄱陽湖地區(qū)6個城市20年(1991-2010年)的人均生態(tài)足跡進行了測算和比較；基于面板數(shù)據(jù)模型以生態(tài)足跡度量生態(tài)資源投入,與勞動力、資本一起作為投入要素對經(jīng)濟增長的內(nèi)在貢獻度進行了分析；研究了全要素增長率與經(jīng)濟增長率的關(guān)系以及三大產(chǎn)業(yè)對生態(tài)足跡的影響。 研究結(jié)果表明： (1)鄱陽湖地區(qū)6個城市在10年間的生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量和經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平存在一定的矛盾差異性,各自表現(xiàn)出不同的耦合協(xié)調(diào)性。其中,南昌市的耦合協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展類型為良好協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展類生態(tài)環(huán)境滯后型,景德鎮(zhèn)市為初級協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展類生態(tài)環(huán)境滯后型,九江市為勉強協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展類經(jīng)濟滯后型,新余市為勉強協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展類生態(tài)環(huán)境滯后型,鷹潭市屬于勉強協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展類生態(tài)經(jīng)濟同步型,撫州市的發(fā)展類型表現(xiàn)為嚴重失調(diào)衰退類經(jīng)濟受損型。 (2)鄱陽湖地區(qū)6個城市的人均生態(tài)足跡呈現(xiàn)逐年上漲的趨勢,生態(tài)資源、勞動力與資本等要素對經(jīng)濟增長的貢獻度呈現(xiàn)出地區(qū)性的差異。南昌、新余和鷹潭屬于資本主導(dǎo)型城市,資本對經(jīng)濟增長的貢獻率最大；景德鎮(zhèn)、九江和撫州屬于勞動力主導(dǎo)型城市,勞動力對經(jīng)濟增長的貢獻率最大。然而,生態(tài)資源要素的貢獻率在6個城市中均居于最后,由此說明生態(tài)資源要素的使用效率過低。 (3)全要素增長率對經(jīng)濟增長起到了關(guān)鍵作用,但是鄱陽湖地區(qū)的6個城市全要素增長率總體水平都很低,說明鄱陽湖地區(qū)城市經(jīng)濟增長的技術(shù)含量較低,要素的使用屬于粗放型的,這種發(fā)展方式不利于該區(qū)域經(jīng)濟長期快速發(fā)展的要求。 (4)三次產(chǎn)業(yè)對生態(tài)足跡的影響不同,第一產(chǎn)業(yè)對生態(tài)足跡的影響最大,第三產(chǎn)業(yè)對生態(tài)足跡的影響最小。由此可見,大力發(fā)展第三產(chǎn)業(yè)將會有效的控制生態(tài)足跡的增長。
[Abstract]:Poyang Lake is the largest freshwater lake in China. Since the establishment of Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone, it has gradually become the strongest comprehensive strength and the largest development potential in Jiangxi Province. At the same time, the region also has the good conditions to develop ecological economy and promote the harmonious development of ecology and economy. However, with the process of urbanization and rapid economic development, the impact of urban economic growth on the ecological environment in Poyang Lake area is more and more prominent. Based on this background, this paper makes an empirical study on the urban ecological environment and economic development in Poyang Lake area. The specific contents of the study include: taking Poyang Lake as the research object, establishing the comprehensive evaluation index system of economic development system and ecological environment system, using principal component analysis method and membership function method, The economic development level and ecological environment quality of six cities (Nanchang, Jingdezhen, Jiujiang, Xinyu, Yingtan, Fuzhou) in Poyang Lake region from 2001 to 2010 were comprehensively evaluated. The calculation model of coupling degree and coupling coordination degree of ecological environment and economic development is given. The ecological footprint per capita of 6 cities in Poyang Lake area from 1991 to 2010 was calculated and compared by using ecological footprint theory. Based on panel data model, ecological resource input is measured by ecological footprint, and the inherent contribution of input factors to economic growth is analyzed together with labor force and capital. The relationship between total factor growth rate and economic growth rate and the influence of three industries on ecological footprint are studied. The results show that: 1) six cities in Poyang Lake region have different ecological environment quality and economic development level in the past 10 years, and each city has different coupling and coordination. Among them, the coupling and coordination development type of Nanchang city is good coordinated development type ecological environment lagging type, Jingdezhen city is primary coordinated development type ecological environment lagging type, Jiujiang city is barely coordinated development type economy lagging type. Xinyu city is a backward type of ecological environment with barely coordinated development, Yingtan is a synchronous type of ecological economy with barely coordinated development, and the development type of Fuzhou is characterized by serious imbalance and recessionary type of economic damage. 2) the per capita ecological footprint of six cities in Poyang Lake region is increasing year by year, and the contribution of ecological resources, labor force and capital to economic growth is different in different regions. Nanchang, Xinyu and Yingtan belong to capital-oriented cities, the contribution rate of capital to economic growth is the largest; Jingdezhen, Jiujiang and Fuzhou belong to labor-oriented cities, and labor forces contribute the most to economic growth. However, the contribution rate of ecological resource elements is the last in six cities, which shows that the use efficiency of ecological resource elements is too low. 3) Total factor growth rate plays a key role in economic growth, but the overall level of total factor growth rate of six cities in Poyang Lake region is very low, which indicates that the technical content of urban economic growth in Poyang Lake region is low. The use of elements is extensive, which is not conducive to the long-term rapid development of the regional economy. The influence of the three industries on the ecological footprint is different. The primary industry has the greatest impact on the ecological footprint, while the tertiary industry has the least impact on the ecological footprint. Thus, the development of tertiary industry will effectively control the growth of ecological footprint.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F224;F127

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賈俊松;謝冬明;鄭博福;鄧紅兵;;江西鄱陽湖區(qū)及五河流域生態(tài)足跡的時空比較分析[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2008年35期

2 傅春;陳煒;歐陽瑩;;環(huán)鄱陽湖區(qū)生態(tài)足跡與經(jīng)濟產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展關(guān)系的實證研究[J];長江流域資源與環(huán)境;2011年12期

3 任繼周，，萬長貴;系統(tǒng)耦合與荒漠─綠洲草地農(nóng)業(yè)系統(tǒng)─—以祁連山一臨澤剖面為例[J];草業(yè)學(xué)報;1994年03期

4 徐中民,張志強,程國棟;甘肅省1998年生態(tài)足跡計算與分析[J];地理學(xué)報;2000年05期

5 劉耀彬,李仁東,宋學(xué)鋒;中國區(qū)域城市化與生態(tài)環(huán)境耦合的關(guān)聯(lián)分析[J];地理學(xué)報;2005年02期

6 張曉東,池天河;90年代中國省級區(qū)域經(jīng)濟與環(huán)境協(xié)調(diào)度分析[J];地理研究;2001年04期

7 黃金川,方創(chuàng)琳;城市化與生態(tài)環(huán)境交互耦合機制與規(guī)律性分析[J];地理研究;2003年02期

8 張麗峰;賈衛(wèi)萍;劉玉川;;環(huán)渤海經(jīng)濟圈生態(tài)足跡與經(jīng)濟增長關(guān)系研究——基于面板數(shù)據(jù)模型的實證分析[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2010年10期

9 董孝斌,高旺盛,嚴茂超;基于能值理論的農(nóng)牧交錯帶兩個典型縣域生態(tài)經(jīng)濟系統(tǒng)的耦合效應(yīng)分析[J];農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)報;2005年11期

10 黃菁;;環(huán)境污染與內(nèi)生經(jīng)濟增長——模型與中國的實證檢驗[J];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年06期

本文編號：1909007