本文選題：中國 + 越南��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國和越南作為在現(xiàn)今走上改革發(fā)展道路的社會(huì)主義國家,改革(革新)時(shí)間最長、程度最深、影響最大,并且形成了獨(dú)特的具有本土化特征的社會(huì)主義理論體系,具有豐富的社會(huì)主義改革與建設(shè)的實(shí)踐和經(jīng)驗(yàn)。二者在如何發(fā)展社會(huì)主義生產(chǎn)力,發(fā)揚(yáng)社會(huì)主義優(yōu)勢(shì)方面都進(jìn)行了全面的調(diào)整與變革,開創(chuàng)了各具特色的發(fā)展道路。尤其在社會(huì)主義經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)方面,對(duì)所有制關(guān)系、市場(chǎng)與分配形式、社會(huì)發(fā)展模式等理論進(jìn)行了獨(dú)特的創(chuàng)新。 本文選取“中越社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革比較研究”為題,以中越兩國經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革(革新)為視點(diǎn),對(duì)社會(huì)主義建設(shè)與發(fā)展在兩國幾十年的改革進(jìn)程中成效、特點(diǎn)與機(jī)制創(chuàng)新的對(duì)比,分析和歸納出中越經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革與革新的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及啟示。圍繞中越兩國,通過梳理兩國社會(huì)主義經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革(革新)以來的思想路線以及社會(huì)主義建設(shè)歷程,分析兩國經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革(革新)的特點(diǎn)以及馬克思主義本土化創(chuàng)新取得的成就,比較改革(革新)路線、政策以及成效的異同,得出社會(huì)主義國家新時(shí)期建設(shè)發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及對(duì)我國深化改革進(jìn)程的啟示。中國和越南在改革的基本思路上都秉承了社會(huì)主義的基本原則和方向,采取了漸進(jìn)式的改革方略,保證了整體改革進(jìn)程的穩(wěn)定有序發(fā)展。中越兩國在經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革(革新)的顯著區(qū)別,在于兩國對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)改革的宏觀目標(biāo)、具體構(gòu)想和步驟都有明顯的差異,因此在經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革(革新)的成效以及改革(革新)進(jìn)程中涌現(xiàn)出來的問題也不同。這是由于兩國的經(jīng)濟(jì)體基本特征不同所造成的,尤其是中越兩國在經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革(革新)之初所擁有的國內(nèi)工業(yè)基礎(chǔ)有相當(dāng)差距,其面臨的國內(nèi)外環(huán)境也有一定的差別,導(dǎo)致了中越在改革(革新)的自身定位和外部資源利用方面都有了本質(zhì)上的差別。 中越兩國經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的歷程都具有深刻的意義,對(duì)社會(huì)主義在全球化背景下的發(fā)展以及馬克思主義在當(dāng)代條件下的創(chuàng)新和實(shí)踐做出了理論和實(shí)踐的現(xiàn)實(shí)貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:China and Vietnam, as socialist countries that have embarked on the road of reform and development today, have the longest time, the deepest degree and the greatest impact on the reform (innovation), and have formed a unique socialist theoretical system with the characteristics of localization.It has rich practice and experience in socialist reform and construction.Both of them have carried on the overall adjustment and reform in how to develop the socialist productive forces and develop the socialist superiority, and have opened up the development road with their own characteristics.Especially in the aspect of socialist economic construction, the theory of ownership relationship, market and distribution, social development model and so on has been innovated.This paper chooses "the comparative study of the reform of the socialist market economic system between China and Vietnam" as the topic, taking the economic system reform (innovation) of the two countries as the point of view, to the socialist construction and development in the reform process of the two countries in the past decades.Compared with the innovation of mechanism, the author analyzes and sums up the experience and enlightenment of the economic system reform and innovation between China and Vietnam.Around China and Vietnam, by combing the ideological line and the course of socialist construction since the reform (innovation) of the socialist economic system between the two countries,Analyzing the characteristics of the economic system reform (innovation) of the two countries, as well as the achievements of the localization innovation of Marxism, comparing the route, policy and effect of the reform (innovation), and comparing the similarities and differences between the two countries.The experience of the construction and development of socialist countries in the new period and the enlightenment to the deepening reform process of our country are obtained.Both China and Vietnam have followed the basic principles and directions of socialism and adopted a gradual reform strategy to ensure the stable and orderly development of the overall reform process.The significant difference between China and Vietnam in economic restructuring (innovation) lies in the fact that the two countries have distinct differences in the macro objectives, concrete ideas and steps of economic reform.As a result, the effectiveness of the economic system reform and the process of reform (innovation) emerged in a different way.This is due to the differences in the basic characteristics of the economies of the two countries. In particular, China and Vietnam had quite different domestic industrial bases at the beginning of their economic restructuring (innovation), and they also faced certain differences in their domestic and foreign environments.As a result, there are essential differences between China and Vietnam in terms of reform (innovation) self-orientation and external resource utilization.The course of economic system reform between China and Vietnam has profound significance and has made theoretical and practical contributions to the development of socialism under the background of globalization and to the innovation and practice of Marxism under the contemporary conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F121;F133.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳元中;蒙奪;羅虹;;越南共產(chǎn)黨十一大的理論創(chuàng)新[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2011年04期

2 趙磊;;越南共產(chǎn)黨第十一次全國代表大會(huì)開啟越南革新開放新時(shí)期[J];東南亞縱橫;2011年02期

3 馬致遠(yuǎn);;越南對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的成就與挑戰(zhàn)[J];東南亞南亞研究;2010年02期

4 周在群;越南向社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的轉(zhuǎn)變及其背景[J];東南亞研究;1993年Z2期

5 欒雅鈞;越南經(jīng)濟(jì)增長模式的分析與思考[J];東南亞研究;2001年01期

6 侯松嶺,王慶生;越南:新世紀(jì) 新氣象[J];東南亞研究;2002年01期

7 曹云華;姚家慶;;論越南的后發(fā)優(yōu)勢(shì)——從東南亞地區(qū)比較的角度看越南的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[J];東南亞研究;2008年05期

8 鄧應(yīng)文;;試析越南近期的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況——以金融動(dòng)蕩為研究重點(diǎn)[J];東南亞研究;2008年05期

9 張明亮;;越南“經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)”的非經(jīng)濟(jì)解讀[J];東南亞研究;2008年05期

10 成漢平;;越南未來五年政治經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展走向預(yù)測(cè)——基于對(duì)越共“十一大”制訂的發(fā)展目標(biāo)之分析[J];東南亞研究;2011年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1767060