本文關鍵詞： 東北亞 區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化 主導權(quán) 東亞　出處：《沈陽理工大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：在世界經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的格局中，東亞是經(jīng)濟增長最為迅速和最具活力的地區(qū)之一。近些年來，其區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化得到了一定程度的發(fā)展。但是，與歐洲和北美地區(qū)的區(qū)域合作相比，東亞地區(qū)的經(jīng)濟一體化進展緩慢。東亞經(jīng)濟一體化如此緩慢的原因有很多，其中的關鍵原因就是東亞地區(qū)大國主導權(quán)的缺失。 目前，在東亞經(jīng)濟一體化中，東盟通過“10+3”機制、三個“10+1”機制，以及東盟地區(qū)論壇和東亞峰會等形式發(fā)揮主導作用。但是，東盟整體實力弱小的特點決定了東盟主導的東亞經(jīng)濟一體化是不穩(wěn)定的，這種主導作用的發(fā)揮只是暫時的。 歐洲和北美地區(qū)合作的成功經(jīng)驗向世人表明，一個或者多個核心大國的領導是區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化順利發(fā)展的關鍵。中日韓三國作為東亞地區(qū)實力雄厚的大國，理應順應發(fā)展潮流，在東亞的經(jīng)濟一體化中發(fā)揮主導作用。本文在區(qū)域經(jīng)濟合作主導權(quán)的有關理論和實踐的基礎上，首先分析目前東亞經(jīng)濟一體化中主導權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀以及其存在的原因和弊端；進而深入分析東北亞中日韓三國主導東亞經(jīng)濟一體化的可行性，并最終對東北亞在東亞經(jīng)濟一體化中發(fā)揮主導作用的路徑進行探索。 整篇論文共五章，其中第一章是緒論，介紹本選題的研究背景和意義，對本文的研究對象進行界定，并分析相關課題的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀，介紹主要內(nèi)容和研究方法以及本文的創(chuàng)新點。 第二章介紹區(qū)域合作主導權(quán)的相關理論和經(jīng)驗，分為兩節(jié)。第一節(jié)介紹理論基礎，，區(qū)域合作主導權(quán)的相關理論即霸權(quán)穩(wěn)定論，分析說明大國主導權(quán)對一個地區(qū)經(jīng)濟一體化進程的重要性。第二節(jié)介紹現(xiàn)實中關于大國主導的兩個成功的一體化組織，即歐盟和北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)。歐盟是在法德主導的基礎上建立發(fā)展起來的，而美國則主導了北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的發(fā)展。從而可知大國在區(qū)域經(jīng)濟一體化中發(fā)揮的重要作用。 第三章闡述東亞經(jīng)濟一體化進程中的主導權(quán)現(xiàn)狀以及歷史沿革，即當前在東亞經(jīng)濟一體化進程中，東盟發(fā)揮著主導作用，以及這種現(xiàn)狀形成的歷史原因。 第四章是本文的重點部分，主要分析東北亞主導東亞經(jīng)濟一體化的可行性，首先分析當前東盟機制存在的缺陷，其次分析東北亞間的國家關系以及東北亞地區(qū)理應獲得主導權(quán)的自身條件，主要是指綜合國力。這些條件包括：其一是硬實力方面，即將東北亞與東盟的經(jīng)濟實力進行對比分析，包括人口、國土面積、GDP、貨物貿(mào)易總額以及FDI的流入量等進行對比。其二是軟實力方面，即將文化活力和政府的政治影響力等方面進行對比。最后得出從長期來看，東北亞能夠主導東亞經(jīng)濟一體化的結(jié)論。 第五章提出東北亞地區(qū)獲得主導權(quán)的路徑，即中日韓三國應加強溝通，摒棄相互間的猜忌，擱置爭議，增強政治互信，為了區(qū)域內(nèi)經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，淡化矛盾，做出適當讓步。 最后是文章結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:In the pattern of world economic development, East Asia is one of the regions with the fastest and most dynamic economic growth. In recent years, its regional economic integration has developed to a certain extent. However, compared with the regional cooperation in Europe and North America, There are many reasons for the slow economic integration in East Asia, the key of which is the lack of dominant power in East Asia. At present, ASEAN plays a leading role in East Asian economic integration through the "103" mechanism, the three "10 1" mechanisms, the ASEAN Regional Forum and the East Asia Summit. The weak overall strength of ASEAN determines that the economic integration of East Asia dominated by ASEAN is unstable, and the exertion of this leading role is only temporary. The successful experience of cooperation between Europe and North America has shown the world that the leadership of one or more core powers is the key to the smooth development of regional economic integration. We should follow the trend of development and play a leading role in the economic integration of East Asia. First of all, it analyzes the present situation of the dominant power in East Asian economic integration, the reasons and disadvantages of its existence, and then deeply analyzes the feasibility of East Asian economic integration dominated by China, Japan and South Korea in Northeast Asia. Finally, the path of Northeast Asia playing a leading role in East Asian economic integration is explored. The first chapter is an introduction, which introduces the research background and significance of this topic, defines the research object of this paper, and analyzes the domestic and foreign research status of related topics. This paper introduces the main contents and research methods as well as the innovation of this paper. The second chapter introduces the theory and experience of regional cooperation dominance, which is divided into two sections. The second section introduces the two successful integration organizations in reality. That is, the European Union and the North American Free Trade area (NAFTA). The European Union was established and developed on the basis of France and Germany, while the United States led the development of the North American Free Trade area, which shows the important role played by the great powers in the regional economic integration. The third chapter expounds the present situation and historical evolution of the leading power in the process of East Asian economic integration, that is, ASEAN plays a leading role in the process of East Asian economic integration, and the historical reasons for the formation of this situation. Chapter 4th is the key part of this paper, mainly analyzes the feasibility of East Asian economic integration led by Northeast Asia, first of all, analyzes the shortcomings of the current ASEAN mechanism. Secondly, it analyzes the inter-state relations in Northeast Asia and the conditions in which the Northeast Asian region should be entitled to take the lead, mainly referring to the comprehensive national strength. These conditions include: first, the hard power. That is, comparing the economic strength of Northeast Asia and ASEAN, including population, land area, gross domestic product, total trade in goods, and the inflow of FDI. Second, soft power. Finally, the conclusion is drawn that Northeast Asia can dominate the economic integration of East Asia in the long run. Chapter 5th puts forward the way to gain the dominant power in Northeast Asia, that is, China, Japan and South Korea should strengthen communication, abandon mutual suspicion, shelve disputes, strengthen political mutual trust, and make appropriate concessions for regional economic development, desalination of contradictions and appropriate concessions. Finally, the conclusion of the article.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F131

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐春祥;;貿(mào)易一體化與東亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟合作[J];東北亞論壇;2009年03期

2 關權(quán);;東亞經(jīng)濟一體化和TPP——中日之間的博弈[J];東北亞論壇;2012年02期

3 仇發(fā)華;;東亞共同體的主導與中日韓的自身定位[J];當代韓國;2010年04期

4 田中青;試論“東亞共同體”[J];當代亞太;2004年10期

5 沈銘輝;;亞洲經(jīng)濟一體化——基于多國FTA戰(zhàn)略角度[J];當代亞太;2010年04期

6 宋偉;;試論美國對亞太區(qū)域合作的戰(zhàn)略目標和政策限度[J];當代亞太;2010年05期

7 李巍;;東亞經(jīng)濟地區(qū)主義的終結(jié)?——制度過剩與經(jīng)濟整合的困境[J];當代亞太;2011年04期

8 徐進;;東亞多邊安全合作機制:問題與構(gòu)想[J];當代亞太;2011年04期

9 楊揚;;誰將主導東亞[J];黨政干部學刊;2007年06期

10 任曉;;東亞合作的發(fā)展與問題[J];東南亞縱橫;2006年06期

相關碩士學位論文 前9條

1 王榮斌;改革開放時期中國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟增長趨同研究[D];河南大學;2005年

2 王瀟瀟;“主導權(quán)”之爭與東亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟合作[D];上海外國語大學;2007年

3 雷小華;東盟在東亞合作中的作用分析[D];華中師范大學;2008年

4 孫曉晗;論東亞一體化進程中的主導權(quán)問題[D];延邊大學;2008年

5 楊琴;東南亞經(jīng)濟一體化研究[D];廈門大學;2008年

6 楊文淼;中國和日本在東亞一體化進程中的主導權(quán)博弈[D];中國政法大學;2009年

7 劉桂霞;論冷戰(zhàn)后中國的東北亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟合作戰(zhàn)略[D];山東師范大學;2009年

8 張亞麗;東亞地區(qū)合作進程中的主導權(quán)問題研究[D];山東大學;2009年

9 塔娜;中日合作對東亞經(jīng)濟一體化的影響及我國的對策[D];延邊大學;2009年

本文編號：1545711