本文關(guān)鍵詞： 產(chǎn)業(yè)集群 創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng) 治理機制 生態(tài)健康　出處：《武漢理工大學(xué)》2013年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：創(chuàng)新能力不足是我國產(chǎn)業(yè)集群升級的最大瓶頸,如何圍繞完善創(chuàng)新鏈來構(gòu)建良好的創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)是提高產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新能力的重要路徑。本文旨在從生態(tài)學(xué)的視角來揭示產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的結(jié)構(gòu)及其進化機制,并探索其地方網(wǎng)絡(luò)治理機制,以期為提高產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的創(chuàng)新能力和治理能力提供借鑒參考。 首先,本文闡述了研究目的和意義,介紹了產(chǎn)業(yè)集群和創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀,并指明了本文研究內(nèi)容和研究方法。其次,對產(chǎn)業(yè)集群理論、創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)理論、生態(tài)學(xué)理論等相關(guān)理論進行了回顧,并介紹了博弈論、協(xié)同理論、種群競爭理論等分析方法,從而為后續(xù)研究奠定理論基礎(chǔ)和和方法支撐。然后,在與自然生態(tài)進行類比的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建了產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的“雙鉆石”空間結(jié)構(gòu)框架模型,提出其創(chuàng)新種群按照功能可以分為原始創(chuàng)新種群、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新種群、創(chuàng)新服務(wù)種群、創(chuàng)新投入種群和制度創(chuàng)新種群。同時,分析了產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的自組織進化機制以及協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的演化博弈模型,研究了產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)組織成員間的競爭協(xié)同進化機制、共生協(xié)同進化機制和捕食協(xié)同進化機制,并給出了平衡條件。進而,構(gòu)建了基于多中心治理理論的產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)治理結(jié)構(gòu)模型,指出各治理主體的功能定位,并分別從從約束機制、激勵機制和協(xié)調(diào)整合機制三方面來研究產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的地方網(wǎng)絡(luò)治理機制。此外,在分析產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)健康的基本內(nèi)涵的基礎(chǔ)上,從種群結(jié)構(gòu)、創(chuàng)新環(huán)境、創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出、可持續(xù)性等四個方面構(gòu)建創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)健康的評價指標體系,采用模糊層次綜合評價法(FAHP)對產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)健康進行綜合評價,并以十堰商用車及零部件產(chǎn)業(yè)集群為例進行計算。在此基礎(chǔ)上,以十堰商用車及零部件產(chǎn)業(yè)集群為研究對象進行案例分析,分析了其創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及存在的問題,并給出種群結(jié)構(gòu)的優(yōu)化策略以及治理機制。最后,對全文進行總結(jié),提出了本文研究的不足和主要創(chuàng)新點,并對此領(lǐng)域研究未來的發(fā)展趨勢進行了展望。 論文綜合運用生態(tài)學(xué)理論、協(xié)同理論、博弈論等理論和方法,系統(tǒng)研究了產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的結(jié)構(gòu)、進化機制和治理機制,研究成果有利于進一步完善集群創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)系統(tǒng),提高產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的創(chuàng)新績效；有利于進一步規(guī)范地方政府的行為,提高地方政府的集群治理能力；有利于豐富和完善創(chuàng)新管理理論,為制定科技管理政策提供參考。
[Abstract]:The shortage of innovation ability is the biggest bottleneck of industrial cluster upgrading in China. How to build a good innovation ecosystem around the innovation chain is an important way to improve the innovation ability of industrial cluster. This paper aims to reveal the structure and evolution mechanism of industrial cluster innovation ecosystem from the perspective of ecology. It also explores the local network governance mechanism in order to provide reference for improving the innovation and governance ability of industrial clusters. Firstly, this paper describes the purpose and significance of the research, introduces the domestic and foreign research status of industrial cluster and innovation ecosystem theory, and points out the research contents and methods of this paper. Secondly, the industrial cluster theory, the innovation system theory, the industrial cluster theory, the innovation system theory, the industrial cluster theory and the innovation ecosystem theory are introduced. The related theories such as ecology theory are reviewed, and the analysis methods such as game theory, synergy theory and population competition theory are introduced, so as to lay a theoretical foundation and method support for further research. On the basis of analogy with natural ecology, this paper constructs a "double diamond" spatial structure model of industrial cluster innovation ecosystem, and puts forward that its innovation population can be divided into original innovation population and technological innovation population according to its function. Innovation service population, innovation input population and institutional innovation population. At the same time, the self-organization evolution mechanism of industrial cluster innovation ecosystem and the evolutionary game model of cooperative innovation are analyzed. In this paper, the competitive co-evolution mechanism, symbiotic co-evolution mechanism and prey-prey co-evolution mechanism among the members of the industrial cluster innovation ecosystem are studied, and the equilibrium conditions are given. This paper constructs the model of industrial cluster innovation ecosystem governance structure based on multi-center governance theory, points out the function orientation of each governance subject, and respectively from the constraint mechanism. In addition, on the basis of analyzing the basic connotation of healthy innovation ecosystem of industrial cluster, the paper studies the local network governance mechanism of industrial cluster innovation ecosystem from three aspects: population structure and innovation environment. The evaluation index system of innovation ecosystem health is constructed from four aspects of innovation output and sustainability, and the comprehensive evaluation of innovation ecosystem health of industrial cluster is carried out by using fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation method (FAHP). Taking Shiyan commercial vehicle and its parts industry cluster as an example, the paper takes Shiyan commercial vehicle and parts industry cluster as the case study object, and analyzes the development status and existing problems of its innovation ecosystem. The optimization strategy and governance mechanism of the population structure are given. Finally, the paper summarizes the full text, puts forward the shortcomings and main innovation points of this paper, and prospects the future development trend of the research in this field. Based on the theories and methods of ecology, coordination and game theory, this paper systematically studies the structure, evolutionary mechanism and governance mechanism of industrial cluster innovation ecosystem. The research results are conducive to further improve the cluster innovation network system, improve the innovation performance of industrial clusters, further standardize the behavior of local governments, and improve the governance capacity of local governments. It is beneficial to enrich and perfect the theory of innovation management and provide reference for the formulation of science and technology management policy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F124.3;F279.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何繼善,戴衛(wèi)明;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的生態(tài)學(xué)模型及生態(tài)平衡分析[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 黃昕,潘軍;關(guān)于汽車工業(yè)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的幾點思考[J];商業(yè)研究;2002年07期

3 任道紋;;國外中小企業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論研究和啟示[J];商業(yè)研究;2007年09期

4 張運生;;高科技企業(yè)創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)風險識別與控制研究[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2008年03期

5 中國工商銀行江蘇省分行課題組;戴春林;劉任捷;丁玉嵐;葛祥;蘇敬工;楊琳;王文超;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群、區(qū)域經(jīng)濟與金融深化——金融支持中國戴南產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展模式研究[J];金融論壇;2006年12期

6 魏旭;張艷;;知識分工、社會資本與集群式創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)的演化[J];當代經(jīng)濟研究;2006年10期

7 楊道虹;;我國集成電路產(chǎn)業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)研究[J];電子工業(yè)專用設(shè)備;2008年09期

8 李湘桔;詹勇飛;;創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)——創(chuàng)新管理的新思路[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社科版);2008年01期

9 潘雄鋒;馬運來;;城市創(chuàng)新生態(tài)評價研究[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

10 劉友金,黃魯成;產(chǎn)業(yè)群集的區(qū)域創(chuàng)新優(yōu)勢與我國高新區(qū)的發(fā)展[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2001年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 戴衛(wèi)明;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群形成和發(fā)展規(guī)律研究[D];中南大學(xué);2005年

2 廖家平;電力市場的博弈論研究及決策支持系統(tǒng)的實現(xiàn)[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

3 羅偉;汽車產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的機理與實證研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 鄧君;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的演進及其若干動力的進化博弈分析[D];重慶大學(xué);2006年

2 于溟;基于系統(tǒng)開放性的產(chǎn)業(yè)集群抗衰退機制研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2007年

3 常鶴;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群多中心治理研究[D];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

4 邢穎;武漢科技創(chuàng)新中的政府職能研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1502897