本文選題：外來者劣勢 + 制度參與��； 參考：《北京郵電大學》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：自黨的十八大以來,面對國內復雜多變的跨省際企業(yè)創(chuàng)新環(huán)境,如何實現(xiàn)中國經(jīng)濟結構調整和對內營造開放式企業(yè)創(chuàng)新環(huán)境這一長期困擾中國經(jīng)濟健康運行的難題,如何實現(xiàn)從制度層面破除省際間“轉軌市場分割”,消除企業(yè)跨省際企業(yè)距離障礙,打破行業(yè)行政障礙,消除企業(yè)跨省際企業(yè)關系障礙,營造適合企業(yè)發(fā)展的開放式生態(tài)環(huán)境,消除企業(yè)跨省際投資企業(yè)合法性障礙成為進一步實現(xiàn)對內開放戰(zhàn)略過程中亟待解決的關鍵問題。因此,如何消除區(qū)域、行業(yè)和企業(yè)三維層級的外來者劣勢影響下跨省際企業(yè)創(chuàng)新阻礙,構建行業(yè)內開放式環(huán)境,是現(xiàn)階段實施對內開放戰(zhàn)略的必由之路。在面對三維制度參與影響下跨省際投資企業(yè)創(chuàng)新的困局和矛盾時,中國對內開放過程已逐步顯現(xiàn)出難以僅從某一單一研究視角解釋阻礙企業(yè)創(chuàng)新的特征,如企業(yè)在區(qū)域制度層面面對的由省際間“轉軌市場分割”導致的距離障礙,企業(yè)在面對行業(yè)關系障礙過程中轉而尋求帶上“紅帽子”以緩解行業(yè)調控失靈等引發(fā)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新成本上升的壓力,企業(yè)如何構建“企業(yè)合法性”,等等。針對政府參與與跨省際企業(yè)創(chuàng)新過程中的問題,本文從全新整合的理論視角探究了區(qū)域層面、行業(yè)層面和企業(yè)層面的外來者劣勢對三維制度參與影響政府參與與跨省際企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效調節(jié)作用的關聯(lián)性和顯著性。這不僅有助于檢驗了區(qū)域、行業(yè)和企業(yè)三維視角下外來者劣勢對企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的調節(jié)作用機制,同時也為營造“兼容并包、求同共贏”的跨省際企業(yè)創(chuàng)新環(huán)境提供了相應的理論和實證支撐。在發(fā)展已有理論方面,現(xiàn)有研究主要著眼于發(fā)達國家(地區(qū))情境依托下外來者劣勢的某單一維度對跨國企業(yè)績效的影響,且已有研究成果主要以討論二者之間的直接關系為主。與此相比,多維度視角下外來者劣勢對制度參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效調節(jié)機制的研究相對匱乏,限制了對外來者劣勢視角下企業(yè)創(chuàng)新資源配置效率和影響機制的認知。迄今為止,尚未發(fā)現(xiàn)中國情境下多維整合視角下外來者劣勢對制度參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的理論和實證研究工作。因此,本文從區(qū)域層級、行業(yè)層級與企業(yè)層級三者整合維度視角探究外來者劣勢對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用機制,并從理論和實證角度回應了企業(yè)如何協(xié)調區(qū)域與企業(yè)、行業(yè)與企業(yè)和企業(yè)與社會三者之間的關系以實現(xiàn)三者的互利共贏,從而為”對內開放”戰(zhàn)略背景下中國如何消除“轉軌市場分割”式地區(qū)壟斷、弱化行業(yè)行政障礙、提升市場對于企業(yè)認同度提供了重要的理論和實證支撐。本文從外來者劣勢理論和制度創(chuàng)新理論論的整合視角出發(fā),針對外來者劣勢對制度參與影響政府參與與跨省際企業(yè)投資過程中的創(chuàng)新績效的特點,選取了 2008年至2014年中國制造業(yè)上市公司數(shù)據(jù),實證分析了外來者劣勢三個細分維度——制度距離障礙、關系障礙和企業(yè)合法性障礙分別對政府參與與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的影響,并實證得出了以下結論:第一、市場化程度可以弱化制度距離障礙對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用,政府調控市場能力可以弱化制度距離障礙對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用,企業(yè)下屬企業(yè)(公司的下屬子公司、聯(lián)營公司或者分公司)數(shù)目最多的區(qū)位分布可以增強制度距離障礙對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用。從橫向視角出發(fā),本文分別通過分組方式分別檢驗了區(qū)域市場化程度和政府調控市場能力對制度距離障礙的調節(jié)作用的地區(qū)差異影響。在區(qū)域市場化程度對制度距離障礙影響政府參與與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的調節(jié)作用中,投資于東部省份將更加有利于弱化制度距離障礙影響力度,投資于中部省份次之;在投資于西部省份企業(yè)當中,區(qū)域市場化能力對制度距離障礙的影響不顯著。在政府調控市場能力對制度距離障礙影響政府參與與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的調節(jié)作用中,中西部地區(qū)省份的政府調控市場能力效應略低于東部地區(qū)的政府調控市場能力影響效應。第二、行業(yè)政策(區(qū)域間行業(yè)規(guī)劃的差異)將會增強關系障礙對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用,行業(yè)國有化程度將會增強關系障礙對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用。從橫向視角出發(fā),本文分別通過分組方式分別檢驗了行業(yè)政策(區(qū)域間行業(yè)規(guī)劃的差異)和行業(yè)國有化程度對制度距離障礙的調節(jié)作用的地區(qū)差異影響。在地區(qū)行業(yè)規(guī)劃的差異對關系障礙調節(jié)作用的地區(qū)差異影響中,中西部地區(qū)的關系障礙對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用明顯大于東部地區(qū)。在行業(yè)國有化程度對關系障礙調節(jié)作用的地區(qū)差異影響中,投資于東部省份地區(qū)將會弱化關系障礙的調節(jié)作用力度,投資于中部省份地區(qū)的影響力度并不顯著,投資于西部省份地區(qū)將會顯著增強關系障礙的調節(jié)作用力度。第三、企業(yè)品牌知名度將會弱化企業(yè)合法性障礙對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用,市場認同度將會弱化企業(yè)合法性障礙對政府參與影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的作用。從橫向視角出發(fā),本文分別通過分組方式分別檢驗了企業(yè)品牌知名度和市場認同度對企業(yè)合法性障礙的調節(jié)作用的地區(qū)差異影響。在企業(yè)品牌知名度對企業(yè)合法性障礙調節(jié)作用的地區(qū)差異影響中,投資于東部省份地區(qū)將會顯著弱化企業(yè)合法性障礙的調節(jié)作用,投資于中部省份的企業(yè)品牌知名度弱化企業(yè)合法性障礙的調節(jié)作用次之,投資于西部省份的弱化作用最低。在市場認同度對企業(yè)合法性障礙調節(jié)作用的地區(qū)差異影響中,投資于中西部地區(qū)省份的企業(yè)在市場認同度對企業(yè)合法性障礙調節(jié)作用略低于東部地區(qū)的調節(jié)作用效應。第四、在區(qū)域市場化程度對關系障礙的調節(jié)作用中,區(qū)域市場化程度對于行業(yè)政策的調節(jié)作用具有負向的再調節(jié)作用,區(qū)域市場化程度對于行業(yè)國有程度的調節(jié)作用具有正向的再調節(jié)作用。實證結果說明政府的行業(yè)政策支持應重點側重調控市場經(jīng)濟發(fā)展程度較低的區(qū)域,而在市場化程度高的地區(qū)應側重降低降低行業(yè)的進入壁壘以提高企業(yè)的創(chuàng)新動力。在區(qū)域市場化程度對企業(yè)合法性障礙的調節(jié)作用中,區(qū)域市場化程度對于企業(yè)品牌知名度的調節(jié)作用具有正向的再調節(jié)作用,區(qū)域市場化程度對于市場認同度的調節(jié)作用具有正向的再調節(jié)作用。實證結果說明隨著區(qū)域市場的開放程度的加深和市場化改革地不斷推進,擁有較高品牌知名程度或企業(yè)市場認同度的企業(yè)將會提升企業(yè)的跨省際投資企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效,并同時提高企業(yè)的創(chuàng)新資源配置效率。本文的創(chuàng)新之處主要體現(xiàn)在以下三個方面:第一、在嵌入跨省際企業(yè)創(chuàng)新環(huán)境情境條件下,本文將外來者劣勢作為第三變量以探究三維制度參與影響下跨省際投資企業(yè)創(chuàng)新的困局和矛盾,并在一定程度上揭示了不同層級制度參與對企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效爭論的原因。第二、本文將外來者劣勢細分為距離障礙(區(qū)域層面)、關系障礙(產(chǎn)業(yè)層級)和企業(yè)合法性障礙(企業(yè)層面)三個細分維度,發(fā)展了基于中國“轉軌市場分割”情境下省際間政府參與的相對差異對于跨省際投資企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的研究。第三、從外來者劣勢理論視角出發(fā),本文發(fā)展了基于制度不均一大國情境的跨省際投資企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的研究。綜上所述,本文剖析了其對于政府參與與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的調節(jié)作用及再調節(jié)作用影響機制,同時在理論和實證檢驗具有一定的創(chuàng)新性。本文寄希望能為激發(fā)國內微觀經(jīng)濟活力和促進國內企業(yè)跨省際投資流動,從而進一步調整省際間產(chǎn)業(yè)結構和釋放東部、中部、西部地區(qū)活力提供相應的理論和實證參考依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Since the eighteen Party of the party, facing the complex and changeable inter provincial enterprise innovation environment in China, how to realize China's economic structure adjustment and create an open enterprise innovation environment which has long plagued the healthy operation of China's economy, how to eliminate the interprovincial "transition market segmentation" from the institutional level to eliminate inter provincial enterprises Enterprise distance barriers, break the barriers of industry administration, eliminate the barriers of inter provincial enterprise relations, create an open ecological environment suitable for the development of enterprises, and eliminate the obstacles of inter provincial investment enterprises to become the key problems to be solved urgently in the process of internal opening strategy. Therefore, how to eliminate regions, industries and enterprises It is the only way to implement the internal open strategy at the present stage. In the face of the dilemma and contradiction of the inter provincial investment enterprise innovation under the influence of the participation of the three dimensional system, the internal opening process has gradually emerged in China. A research perspective explains the characteristics that impede enterprise innovation, such as the distance barriers that enterprises face in the regional system level, which is caused by the interprovincial "transition market segmentation", and the enterprise is seeking to bring the "red hat" in the face of the barriers of industry relations to alleviate the rising cost of enterprise innovation by taking "red hat" in order to alleviate the failure of industry regulation and control. How to build "enterprise legitimacy", and so on. Aiming at the problems in the process of government participation and inter provincial enterprise innovation, this paper explores the relationship between the regional level, the industry level and the enterprise level from the new and integrated theoretical perspective to the effect of the participation of the government and the inter provincial enterprise on the innovation performance of the inter provincial enterprises. It is not only helpful to test the mechanism of the adjustment of the outsider's disadvantages to the enterprise innovation performance in the three-dimensional perspective of the region, industry and enterprise, but also provides the corresponding theoretical and empirical support for the creation of the inter provincial enterprise innovation environment with "all inclusive and win-win". It is necessary to focus on the impact of a single dimension on the performance of transnational enterprises in the context of developed countries (regions), and the existing research results are mainly to discuss the direct relationship between the two. So far, the theoretical and empirical research on the impact of institutional participation on enterprise innovation performance under the perspective of multidimensional integration in China has not been found. Therefore, this article is from the regional level, industry level and enterprise level three. From the perspective of the integration dimension, the author explores the mechanism of the influence of the outsider's weakness on the government participation in the enterprise innovation performance. From the theoretical and empirical perspective, it responds how the enterprise coordinates the relationship between the region and the enterprise, the industry and enterprise and the three party of the society in order to achieve the mutual benefit and win-win situation of the three. How to eliminate the "transition market segmentation" type of regional monopoly, weaken the administrative barriers of the industry, and improve the market for enterprise identity has provided an important theoretical and empirical support. From the perspective of the integration of outsider's inferiority theory and institutional innovation theory, this paper affects government participation and inter provincial enterprises to participate in the system participation. The characteristics of the innovation performance in the process of industry investment selected the data of Chinese manufacturing listed companies from 2008 to 2014, and analyzed the influence of the three subdivisions of the outsider's weakness, institutional distance barriers, relationship barriers and corporate legitimacy barriers on government participation and enterprise innovation performance, and the following conclusions were drawn as follows: First, the degree of marketization can weaken the effect of institutional distance barriers on the influence of government participation on enterprise innovation performance. Government regulation and control of market ability can weaken the role of institutional distance barriers on government participation in enterprise innovation performance, and the largest number of location points for enterprise subordinate enterprises (subsidiary subsidiaries, joint ventures or sub companies) of enterprises. Cloth can enhance the effect of institutional distance barriers on the impact of government participation on enterprise innovation performance. From a horizontal perspective, this paper respectively tests regional differences in Regional Marketization and government regulation and control of market ability to institutional distance barriers respectively. In the moderating effect of government participation and enterprise innovation performance, the investment in the eastern provinces will be more conducive to the weakening of the institutional distance barriers, and the investment in the central provinces is the second. In the western province, the Regional Marketization ability has no significant influence on the institutional distance barriers. In the moderating effect of distance barriers on government participation and enterprise innovation performance, the effect of government regulation on market capability in the central and western provinces is slightly lower than that in the eastern region. Second, the industry policy (the difference in Interregional industrial planning) will increase the relationship barriers to the government participation and influence the enterprise innovation performance The role of industry nationalization will enhance the effect of relationship barriers on the impact of government participation on enterprise innovation performance. From a horizontal perspective, the impact of regional differences on the regulation of industry policy (regional industrial planning differences) and the degree of industry nationalization on the adjustment of metric distance barriers is respectively examined from a horizontal perspective. In the regional difference impact on the adjustment of relationship barriers, the role of relationship barriers in the central and western regions is significantly greater than that of the eastern region. In the regional differences in the regulation of the relationship barriers, the investment in the eastern provinces will be weak. The impact of investment in the central province is not significant. Investment in the western provinces will significantly enhance the regulatory role of the relationship barriers. Third, the reputation of the enterprise brand will weaken the role of the corporate legitimacy obstacle to the government participation in the enterprise innovation performance, the market identity will be It will weaken the effect of corporate legitimacy barriers on the impact of government participation on enterprise innovation performance. From a horizontal perspective, this paper respectively examines the regional differences in the adjustment of corporate brand awareness and market identity to the legal barriers of enterprises respectively. In the regional differences, the investment in the eastern provinces will weaken the regulatory role of the legal barriers of the enterprises in the eastern provinces, and the moderating effect of the investment in the weakening enterprises of the enterprises in the central provinces is the second, and the weakmost weakening effect in the western provinces. The effect of market identity on corporate legitimacy barriers is slightly lower than that of the eastern region. Fourth, the extent of regional marketization is negative to the regulation of industry policy in the moderating effect of Regional Marketization on relationship barriers. The degree of regional marketization has a positive effect on the adjustment of the state level of the industry. The empirical results show that the government's policy support should focus on regulating the low development level of the market economy, while the area with high market level should focus on reducing the barriers to entry in the industry. In the adjustment of the degree of Regional Marketization, the degree of regional marketization has a positive effect on the adjustment of the reputation of the enterprise brand, and the degree of regional marketization has a positive effect on the adjustment of the market identity. The empirical results show that the effect of regional marketization has a positive effect on the adjustment of the market identity. With the deepening of the openness of the regional market and the continuous promotion of the market-oriented reform, enterprises with higher brand awareness or enterprise market identity will improve the innovation performance of inter provincial investment enterprises and improve the efficiency of enterprise innovation resources allocation. The innovation of this paper is mainly reflected in the following three aspects: First, under the conditions of inter provincial enterprise innovation environment situation, this paper takes the outsider's weakness as the third variable to explore the dilemma and contradiction of the inter provincial investment enterprise innovation under the influence of the participation of the three-dimension system, and to a certain extent reveals the reasons for the dispute between the different hierarchy system participation in the enterprise innovation performance. Second, this article will be bad for the outsiders. The potential is divided into three subdivisions of distance barriers (regional level), relationship barriers (industrial level) and enterprise legitimacy barriers (enterprise level). The research on the relative differences of interprovincial government participation in interprovincial investment enterprises is developed based on the "transition market segmentation" situation in China. Third, from the perspective of the disadvantaged theory. In this paper, the research on the innovation performance of inter provincial investment enterprises based on the situation of a large and uneven country is developed. To sum up, this paper analyses the regulatory role of the government participation and the innovation performance of the enterprise and the mechanism of the effect of the effect of the re regulation. At the same time, it has a certain innovation in the theoretical and empirical tests. The domestic micro economic vitality and the promotion of inter provincial investment flow in China will further adjust the inter provincial industrial structure and release the vitality of the eastern, central and western regions to provide the corresponding theoretical and empirical reference.
【學位授予單位】：北京郵電大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F425;F273.1;F406.7

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 袁欣然;岳莎莎;孫晶;;科技創(chuàng)新簡述[J];今日科苑;2008年18期

2 ;世界科技創(chuàng)新的新趨勢[J];咸陽師范�？茖W校學報;2000年03期

3 黃兆銀;;高科技創(chuàng)新競爭的兩個層面[J];世界知識;2000年14期

4 ;世界科技創(chuàng)新十大特點[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)科技;2000年04期

5 鄧壽鵬;世界科技創(chuàng)新的10大趨勢[J];今日科技;2001年12期

6 李京文;全球創(chuàng)新競爭中的中國制度創(chuàng)新與管理創(chuàng)新[J];江海學刊;2002年01期

7 夏保華;當代企業(yè)技術創(chuàng)新競爭的特點和趨向[J];科技進步與對策;2002年11期

8 董靜;論創(chuàng)新的制度安排[J];河北學刊;2003年02期

9 劉明宇;;產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新模式升級與創(chuàng)新競爭[J];社會科學;2009年04期

10 閆威;劉智慧;;企業(yè)創(chuàng)新競爭理論研究綜述[J];科技進步與對策;2010年06期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 劉二中;;關于增強我國企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新能力舉措的若干問題[A];“青年科學家創(chuàng)新與社會條件支持系統(tǒng)”課題研究論文集[C];2006年

2 鄭海超;侯文華;石柳;;網(wǎng)上創(chuàng)新競爭中發(fā)布者欺詐行為的防范機制研究[A];第五屆（2010）中國管理學年會——信息管理分會場論文集[C];2010年

3 張建;王瑩;;創(chuàng)新設計——提高企業(yè)競爭力的不竭動力[A];節(jié)能環(huán)保 和諧發(fā)展——2007中國科協(xié)年會論文集（二）[C];2007年

4 張鋼;徐乾;;模塊化產(chǎn)業(yè)結構中的企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新[A];第三屆科技政策與管理學術研討會暨第二屆科教發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略論壇論文匯編[C];2007年

5 賀廣明;;世界領先企業(yè)創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)略的可持續(xù)性變革及對我國公司的重要啟示[A];科學發(fā)展觀：理論·模式·實踐——山東省社會科學界2006年學術年會文集（2）[C];2006年

6 朱方明;肖丕楚;;以自主創(chuàng)新?lián)屨嘉鞑繎?zhàn)略制高點——四川企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新調研報告[A];科學發(fā)展觀與中國特色社會主義——全國社會科學院系統(tǒng)鄧小平理論研究中心第十一屆年會暨學術研討會論文集[C];2006年

7 曾歡;;技術共同體與中國的自主創(chuàng)新[A];2012年全國科學學理論與學科建設暨科學技術學兩委聯(lián)合年會論文集[C];2012年

8 范芳;;不斷創(chuàng)新 迎接知識經(jīng)濟的挑戰(zhàn)[A];福建省圖書館學會2001年年會論文集[C];2001年

9 陳明華;;IBM綠色零售行動[A];首屆中國POS及商業(yè)自動化行業(yè)大會論文集[C];2008年

10 王立;白波;;北京市社會公益科技創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)分析研究[A];提高全民科學素質、建設創(chuàng)新型國家——2006中國科協(xié)年會論文集[C];2006年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 中國民（私）營經(jīng)濟研究會副會長、富通集團董事局主席 王建沂;民營企業(yè)：由創(chuàng)業(yè)競爭向創(chuàng)新競爭跨越[N];中華工商時報;2014年

2 臨風;全球創(chuàng)新競爭中的政府與市場[N];科技日報;2014年

3 彭斯達;培植創(chuàng)新力　應對新挑戰(zhàn)[N];光明日報;2002年

4 本報評論員;創(chuàng)新進取 無中生有[N];湖北日報;2012年

5 上海交通大學博士、數(shù)字電視國家工程研究中心副主任 王延峰;協(xié)同創(chuàng)新：開啟產(chǎn)學研合作2.0時代[N];中國教育報;2013年

6 胡曉鵬;創(chuàng)新六問[N];上海證券報;2006年

7 劉世錦邋張文魁;以激勵機制創(chuàng)新促進自主創(chuàng)新[N];人民日報;2008年

8 本報記者 宋紹彩;代表委員呼吁立法推進自主創(chuàng)新[N];政府采購信息報;2008年

9 張書軍 中山大學管理學院;超越“自主創(chuàng)新”束縛 實現(xiàn)“向卓越競爭”[N];中國社會科學報;2010年

10 任建軍;創(chuàng)新：“需要更新更勇敢的頭腦”[N];解放軍報;2008年

相關博士學位論文 前8條

1 李毅;外來者劣勢視角下的中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效研究[D];北京郵電大學;2017年

2 周軼昆;基于廠商學習的產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新機制研究[D];暨南大學;2007年

3 韓儒博;創(chuàng)新模式研究及其國際比較[D];中共中央黨校;2013年

4 林學軍;基于三重螺旋創(chuàng)新理論模型的創(chuàng)新體系研究[D];暨南大學;2010年

5 張忠唐;企業(yè)持續(xù)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)主導力的培育及評價研究[D];天津大學;2007年

6 黃瑋強;基于復雜社會網(wǎng)絡的創(chuàng)新擴散研究[D];東北大學;2009年

7 王彥博;基于知識創(chuàng)新的跨組織網(wǎng)絡的微觀層面研究[D];天津大學;2012年

8 初守恒;企業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)品創(chuàng)新策略研究[D];中國礦業(yè)大學（北京）;2009年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 楊奇松;貴州省科技創(chuàng)新的金融支持研究[D];貴州大學;2015年

2 李慧;黨的科技創(chuàng)新思想在資源型城市的實踐[D];東北石油大學;2015年

3 劉冉;我國中小企業(yè)成長的創(chuàng)新模式與機制研究[D];北京工業(yè)大學;2016年

4 瑞亞（VALERiyA SPELNyKOVA）;烏克蘭科技創(chuàng)新法律制度研究[D];天津大學;2015年

5 李明貝;技術多元化對創(chuàng)新績效內在機理研究[D];浙江工商大學;2017年

6 曾夢丹;中小學教師科技創(chuàng)新教育參與意愿研究[D];深圳大學;2017年

7 代露露;區(qū)域創(chuàng)新資源環(huán)境對企業(yè)創(chuàng)新能力的影響研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學;2013年

8 宋利真;產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同包容性創(chuàng)新研究[D];鄭州大學;2013年

9 向中華;升達公司產(chǎn)品創(chuàng)新管理體系設計[D];四川大學;2004年

10 張茜;企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新的實現(xiàn)路徑及其模式選擇研究[D];山東理工大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2040332