本文選題：高新技術(shù)　切入點：創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)　出處：《首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在國家政策和總理的支持、鼓勵下,我國近年來掀起了一股創(chuàng)業(yè)潮,創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)越來越多;但創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)因股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)不合理而導(dǎo)致創(chuàng)始人失去對企業(yè)的控制權(quán)或團隊解散的情況時有發(fā)生,研究創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)的股權(quán)分配問題對于創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)來說具有較強的現(xiàn)實指導(dǎo)意義。創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)的股權(quán)分配是創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)人力資源管理的第一要務(wù),研究創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)的股權(quán)分配有助于豐富人力資源管理的內(nèi)容,具有重要的理論意義。文章旨在研究高新技術(shù)創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)股權(quán)分配方面遇到的困難或疑惑,并通過專家訪談提供有針對性的意見和建議。本文以利益相關(guān)者作為理論基礎(chǔ),設(shè)計問卷并經(jīng)典抽樣,對25家具備行業(yè)特征的高新技術(shù)企業(yè)進行問卷調(diào)查,對6位企業(yè)家代表進行深度訪談,通過對訪談記錄的解讀總結(jié)出問題,并就問題與專家進行訪談,尋求專家的指導(dǎo),提出相應(yīng)的建議。通過問卷調(diào)查法和深度訪談法結(jié)合,對問卷結(jié)果運用描述性統(tǒng)計和分析,對訪談記錄利用線性模式從下而上對數(shù)據(jù)進行抽樣分析。獲得的結(jié)論有:(1)創(chuàng)始人重視聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人的選擇,但團隊搭建的科學(xué)性應(yīng)有所改善;(2)高新技術(shù)創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)家重視公司股權(quán),但專業(yè)度比較低,企業(yè)家應(yīng)當(dāng)加強對自身股權(quán)知識學(xué)習(xí);(3)眾多創(chuàng)始人在公司股權(quán)架構(gòu)設(shè)計過程中遇到過困難或風(fēng)險,可向股權(quán)專家或?qū)I(yè)咨詢公司尋求專業(yè)的指導(dǎo)或服務(wù),借助于外界力量設(shè)計科學(xué)合理的股權(quán)架構(gòu),利于公司的健康持續(xù)發(fā)展;(4)創(chuàng)業(yè)公司股權(quán)架構(gòu)的設(shè)計不存在萬能的模式,但在股權(quán)架構(gòu)設(shè)計中有可供參考的要素。本文的創(chuàng)新主要體現(xiàn)在研究主體、研究內(nèi)容和研究方法的創(chuàng)新;本文的局限主要體現(xiàn)在問卷調(diào)研企業(yè)數(shù)量較少,深度訪談效果還有提升空間,本次質(zhì)性研究結(jié)論,只對具有相同或類似情況的公司有參考意義。
[Abstract]:With the support of the national policy and the Prime Minister, China has set off a wave of entrepreneurship in recent years, more and more entrepreneurial enterprises; However, because of the unreasonable ownership structure, the founder loses control of the enterprise or the team dissolves. It is of great practical significance to study the issue of equity allocation of entrepreneurial enterprises, which is the most important task of human resource management. It is of great theoretical significance to study the equity distribution of entrepreneurial enterprises, which is helpful to enrich the contents of human resource management. Based on the theoretical basis of stakeholders, this paper designs a questionnaire and a classic sample of 25 high-tech enterprises with industry characteristics, and carries out a questionnaire survey on 25 high-tech enterprises with industry characteristics. The six representatives of entrepreneurs were interviewed in depth, and the problems were summed up through the interpretation of interview records, and the questions were interviewed with the experts, and the experts' guidance was sought, and the corresponding suggestions were put forward, which were combined with the questionnaire survey and the in-depth interviews. Descriptive statistics and analysis were used to analyze the results of the questionnaire, and a linear model was used to sample the data from the bottom to the top. The conclusion was that the founder attached importance to the choice of the co-founder. However, the scientific nature of team building should be improved. (2) High-tech entrepreneurs attach importance to the equity of the company, but the degree of professionalism is relatively low. Entrepreneurs should learn more about their own equity knowledge. (3) many founders have encountered difficulties or risks in the design of a company's equity structure, and may seek professional guidance or services from equity experts or professional consulting firms. With the help of external forces, the design of scientific and reasonable equity structure is conducive to the healthy and sustainable development of the company. (4) there is no omnipotent model for the design of equity structure of a start-up company. However, there are some elements for reference in the design of equity structure. The innovation of this paper is mainly reflected in the innovation of research subjects, research contents and research methods, and the limitations of this paper are mainly reflected in the small number of questionnaire research enterprises. There is also room for improvement in the effect of in-depth interviews. The qualitative findings are only useful to companies with the same or similar conditions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F276.44;F271

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳嵋山;動態(tài)股權(quán)分配方案設(shè)計[J];上海管理科學(xué);2002年03期

2 曾慶宗;動態(tài)股權(quán)分配法[J];企業(yè)管理;1999年10期

3 Asheesh Advani;金笙;;新創(chuàng)企業(yè)的股權(quán)分配[J];創(chuàng)業(yè)邦;2010年03期

4 潘金忠,倪慧君;實行薪點股權(quán)分配制的構(gòu)想[J];決策借鑒;2001年02期

5 白剛;;價值鏈戰(zhàn)略:走出泥潭的利器[J];銷售與市場(評論版);2013年02期

6 董金鵬;;股權(quán)分配 如何魚與熊掌兼得?[J];中外管理;2014年05期

7 黨興華,趙巧艷,黃正超;基于努力程度的創(chuàng)業(yè)投資最優(yōu)股權(quán)分配模型[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2005年09期

8 李敏;股份合作制股權(quán)分配機制探討[J];青海大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2000年03期

9 王紅梅;;科技型風(fēng)險企業(yè)股權(quán)分配研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2009年09期

10 牟戎 ,黃勇;名揚海內(nèi)外的新中港集團[J];江海僑聲;1994年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 ;股權(quán)分配：合理決定穩(wěn)定[N];中國高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導(dǎo)報;2003年

2 河北國大連鎖商業(yè)有限公司總經(jīng)理 于樹中;成功就是達成目標[N];中華合作時報;2011年

3 本報記者　 夏峰;展開排他談判 花旗望抱得廣發(fā)行[N];上海證券報;2006年

4 王麗艷 宋雪;荒里社區(qū)：村民變股民[N];人民日報海外版;2013年

5 ;一路上有你[N];杭州日報;2011年

6 智聯(lián);創(chuàng)業(yè)者切忌被四種理論誤導(dǎo)[N];中國高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導(dǎo)報;2007年

7 本報記者　 于曉娜;廣發(fā)行重組競標案已報國務(wù)院[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2006年

8 本報記者　 賈玉寶 吳雨珊;廣發(fā)行競標仍在最后沖刺階段[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2006年

9 ;Google還能領(lǐng)先多久？[N];計算機世界;2004年

10 本報記者 商e，

本文編號：1609127