本文關(guān)鍵詞： 抽水蓄能電站 資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理 層次分析法 模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)　出處：《華北電力大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)電力企業(yè)電力負(fù)荷與日俱增,尤其是日間負(fù)荷更是增長(zhǎng)迅速,于是造成用電峰谷差越來(lái)越大。為緩解電力系統(tǒng)的高峰與低谷之間供需落差的問(wèn)題,因而產(chǎn)生了抽水蓄能電站,它是電力系統(tǒng)調(diào)峰運(yùn)行的重要保證。資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理是抽水蓄能電站在新能源、新發(fā)展形勢(shì)下實(shí)現(xiàn)企業(yè)全面協(xié)調(diào)、可持續(xù)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略要求。探索資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理在抽水蓄能電站的資產(chǎn)管理模式中的優(yōu)勢(shì),確定資產(chǎn)管理的重點(diǎn)內(nèi)容,提出抽水蓄能電站資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系與模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型,為抽水蓄能電站建立全面、協(xié)調(diào)的資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理體系奠定基礎(chǔ)。本文以抽水蓄能電站的資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理評(píng)價(jià)為研究對(duì)象,首先介紹了抽水蓄能電站生產(chǎn)方式和資產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)方式,對(duì)抽水蓄能電站的資產(chǎn)特點(diǎn)及資產(chǎn)管理現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分析,并闡述了資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理理論的基本思想與涵蓋了管理體制、管理機(jī)制、管理辦法和管理手段的實(shí)施策略;其次,通過(guò)研究管理指標(biāo)體系的設(shè)計(jì)方法,包括指標(biāo)設(shè)計(jì)原則、指標(biāo)獲取途徑、指標(biāo)設(shè)置方法和指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化處理,從而建立了抽水蓄能電站資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,包括規(guī)劃計(jì)劃階段指標(biāo)、采購(gòu)建設(shè)階段指標(biāo)、運(yùn)行維護(hù)階段指標(biāo)以及退役處置階段指標(biāo)共計(jì)25項(xiàng)指標(biāo);再次,根據(jù)層次分析法的原理及其建模步驟,對(duì)抽水蓄能電站資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理過(guò)程中的各指標(biāo)權(quán)重進(jìn)行了設(shè)計(jì)和定義,建立了包括四層的遞階層次的結(jié)構(gòu)模型,并且通過(guò)向?qū)＜野l(fā)放征詢(xún)意見(jiàn)表,獲得各級(jí)指標(biāo)的判斷矩陣,通過(guò)確定相對(duì)權(quán)重系數(shù)和一致性檢驗(yàn)計(jì)算出了權(quán)向量W,從而計(jì)算并列出評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)總排序權(quán)值計(jì)算結(jié)果,即各個(gè)指標(biāo)相對(duì)于最高層的相對(duì)重要性指標(biāo);接著,闡述了對(duì)抽水蓄能電站資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)的方法和步驟,根據(jù)已確定的管理指標(biāo)權(quán)重進(jìn)行單因素評(píng)價(jià),即分別對(duì)定性指標(biāo)和定量指標(biāo)的隸屬度進(jìn)行確定,對(duì)于定量指標(biāo)的隸屬度計(jì)算采用模糊數(shù)學(xué)方法推求,即用最大、最小隸屬函數(shù)模型,來(lái)模擬部分定量指標(biāo)的隸屬函數(shù)曲線;定性指標(biāo)隸屬度的推求采用模糊統(tǒng)計(jì)法,計(jì)算出多層次模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果。最后,按照上述方法和步驟針對(duì)某抽水蓄能電站進(jìn)行了實(shí)例研究,即對(duì)其資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理進(jìn)行了多層次模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià),評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果表明本文所確立的評(píng)價(jià)體系是可行有效的,并對(duì)該抽水蓄能電站資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果中體現(xiàn)的缺陷和不足提出了改進(jìn)的措施和對(duì)策,為今后該抽水蓄能電站資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理的提升指明了方向。論文的研究成果對(duì)于抽水蓄能電站的資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理評(píng)價(jià)提供了參考和依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:With the development of electricity power load in our country especially the day more grow with each passing day, the load is increased rapidly, thus resulting in more electricity peak valley difference between peak and trough. More and ease the power system of supply and demand gap, resulting in a pumped storage power station, it is important to ensure the power system peak load operation. The whole life cycle asset management is pumped storage in new energy power plants, realize the comprehensive coordinated development of enterprises in the new situation, the strategic requirements of sustainable development. To explore the advantages of life cycle asset management in pumped storage power plant asset management mode, determine the key contents of asset management, put forward the evaluation index system of pumped storage life cycle the management of power plant assets and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of pumped storage power station for the establishment of a comprehensive, lay the foundation for life cycle management system of coordination of assets. Based on Pumped Storage Power Station The life cycle management of assets evaluation as the research object, first pumped storage power station production and asset management mode is introduced, analyzed the current situation of asset characteristics and asset management of pumped storage power plant, and expounds the basic idea of asset life cycle management theory and covers the management system, management mechanism, strategy management ways and means of management; secondly, through the study on the design method of management index system, including index design principles, index acquisition approach, standardized processing index setting method and index data, and establishing the life cycle management of pumped storage power plant asset evaluation index system, including the planning stage index, procurement and construction stage index, operation and maintenance stage index and disposal stage index of a total of 25 indicators; thirdly, according to the principle of analytic hierarchy process and modeling steps of The weight of each index of pumped storage power assets life cycle management in the design and definition, including the establishment of the hierarchical structure model of four layers, and through to the expert issued advice table, obtain the judgment matrix of indicators at all levels, by determining the relative weight coefficient and consistency test to calculate the weight vector W, to calculate and list the evaluation index total rank weights calculation results, namely each index relative to the index of relative importance top; then describes the methods and steps of evaluation of pumped storage power plant asset lifecycle management, single factor evaluation according to weight management indicators have been identified, namely the membership of the qualitative and the quantitative indicators were determined for membership quantitative index calculation by using the fuzzy mathematics method to derive the maximum, i.e., the minimum membership function to simulate the model. Membership function curve of some quantitative indicators; for qualitative index membership degree of fuzzy statistics, calculate the multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results. Finally, according to the above methods and steps for a pumped storage power station is studied, which is on the whole life cycle management of the assets of the multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, evaluation the results showed that the establishment of the evaluation system is feasible and effective, and the pumped storage power plant life cycle asset management evaluation results and put forward the measures to improve the defects and deficiencies in the future for the pumped storage power indicates the direction of the life cycle management of power plant assets to enhance the research results of this paper provide. The reference and basis for the evaluation of life cycle management of pumped storage power plant assets.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北電力大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F426.61;F273.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 匡小平;鄧威;李文祿;;基于灰色層次分析法的戰(zhàn)儲(chǔ)物資管理效能評(píng)價(jià)[J];軍事交通學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年11期

2 汪衛(wèi)平;吳培枝;;瑯琊山抽水蓄能電站機(jī)組黑啟動(dòng)試驗(yàn)分析[J];水電自動(dòng)化與大壩監(jiān)測(cè);2014年05期

3 黃偉;;電網(wǎng)企業(yè)資產(chǎn)全壽命周期成本管理初探[J];貴州電力技術(shù);2014年09期

4 ZHANG Yeming;CAI Maolin;;Overall Life Cycle Comprehensive Assessment of Pneumatic and Electric Actuator[J];Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering;2014年03期

5 孫興;姜學(xué)樸;王躍東;;智能電網(wǎng)可靠性分析應(yīng)用及指標(biāo)提升措施[J];電氣應(yīng)用;2013年S2期

6 李麗娟;;全壽命周期成本理論在電網(wǎng)規(guī)劃中的應(yīng)用分析[J];貴州電力技術(shù);2013年10期

7 馬延亮;李會(huì)芳;李蓉蓉;袁麗君;;基于主成分分析的區(qū)域固定資產(chǎn)投資效益評(píng)價(jià)[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年18期

8 李宏力;吳建國(guó);;基于LCC狀態(tài)評(píng)價(jià)可靠性評(píng)價(jià)和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估的設(shè)備綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法研究及應(yīng)用[J];貴州電力技術(shù);2013年03期

9 劉漢生;劉劍;李俊娥;王漢廣;郭力;郭瑋;;基于全壽命周期成本評(píng)估的特高壓直流輸電線路導(dǎo)線選型[J];高電壓技術(shù);2012年02期

10 劉俊保;;電力企業(yè)資產(chǎn)全生命周期管理[J];技術(shù)與市場(chǎng);2012年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 張勇;;電網(wǎng)企業(yè)資產(chǎn)全壽命周期管理流程優(yōu)化研究[A];第十一屆中國(guó)管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 曹f ;風(fēng)電及抽水蓄能電站容量規(guī)劃方法研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王冠男;基層電網(wǎng)公司物資風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];華北電力大學(xué)（北京）;2011年

2 葉珍;基于AHP的模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法研究及應(yīng)用[D];華南理工大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1543472