本文選題：文化產(chǎn)業(yè) + 產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)��； 參考：《山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：文化產(chǎn)業(yè)是以創(chuàng)造力為核心的朝陽產(chǎn)業(yè)，具有獨(dú)創(chuàng)性、融合性強(qiáng)、產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈長、產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)性大等特點(diǎn)，具有很強(qiáng)的產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)。同時，文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展可以帶動其他相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)的共同發(fā)展，產(chǎn)生綜合的聯(lián)動效應(yīng)。近年來，我國政府高度重視文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展，提出了一系列促進(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的相關(guān)政策。20世紀(jì)90年代意大利學(xué)者Breschi和Malerba提出了產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)理論，該理論是基于系統(tǒng)論、演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和國家創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)等理論發(fā)展起來的，之后有很多學(xué)者延續(xù)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)理論的研究，將產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)理論廣泛用于行業(yè)研究。 本文從產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)理論出發(fā)研究我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率水平。首先，本文運(yùn)用產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)理論分析了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)構(gòu)成要素，包括文化企業(yè)、其他參與者（高等學(xué)校、研究機(jī)構(gòu)、金融機(jī)構(gòu)等）、網(wǎng)絡(luò)（創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)、文化產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈、融合產(chǎn)業(yè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)）、需求、政府、制度和系統(tǒng)運(yùn)行與協(xié)同演進(jìn)，并且基于產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)視角分析了我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀，分析表明我國文化企業(yè)門類較多，文化類上市公司近幾年發(fā)展較快，但相比于其它產(chǎn)業(yè)上市公司數(shù)量較少；文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)體系具有復(fù)雜性；文化產(chǎn)業(yè)市場需求潛力大，，農(nóng)村文化產(chǎn)業(yè)市場有待進(jìn)一步開發(fā)；政府在文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展中發(fā)揮了重要的作用，一些地方政府存在過分依賴政策現(xiàn)象；文化產(chǎn)業(yè)制度能夠為文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展建立約束機(jī)制與激勵機(jī)制；各個要素的系統(tǒng)運(yùn)行與協(xié)同演進(jìn)效率較好，文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展迅速，但是達(dá)到國家支柱產(chǎn)業(yè)仍有一段距離。其次采用文獻(xiàn)分析法、理論分析法和專家咨詢法等三種方法相結(jié)合，對文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率指標(biāo)進(jìn)行篩選，構(gòu)建了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率指標(biāo)體系，接著根據(jù)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)理論和文獻(xiàn)分析選取本文的效率研究方法為三階段DEA。再次運(yùn)用三階段DEA對我國31個省市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率水平進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析，分析表明東部地區(qū)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展較好，中西部地區(qū)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展相對落后；與東部地區(qū)相比，中西部地區(qū)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展更易受到環(huán)境因素的影響；GDP和人均文化娛樂消費(fèi)支出對于文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展呈現(xiàn)正向的作用；文化體育與傳媒財政支出和文化事業(yè)費(fèi)的支出對于文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展呈現(xiàn)反向作用。最后針對文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展存在的問題提出了相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:Cultural industry is a sunrise industry with creativity as its core. It has the characteristics of originality, strong integration, long industrial chain and great industrial relevance, and has strong industrial technology spillover effect. At the same time, the development of cultural industry can promote the common development of other related industries and produce a comprehensive linkage effect. In recent years, our government attached great importance to the development of cultural industry, and put forward a series of related policies to promote the development of cultural industry. In the 1990s, Italian scholars Breschi and Malerba put forward the theory of industrial innovation system, which is based on system theory. The theories of evolutionary economics and national innovation system have been developed. After that, many scholars have continued the research of industrial innovation system theory, and applied the theory of industrial innovation system theory to industry research extensively. This paper studies the efficiency level of China's cultural industry from the theory of industrial innovation system. First of all, this paper analyzes the elements of cultural industry innovation system, including cultural enterprises, other participants (institutions of higher learning, research institutions, financial institutions, etc.), network (innovation network, cultural industry chain, etc.) This paper analyzes the current situation of cultural industry development in China from the perspective of industrial innovation system, and shows that there are many categories of cultural enterprises in China. Cultural listed companies have developed rapidly in recent years, but compared with other industries, the number of listed companies is relatively small, the innovation network system of cultural industry is complex, the market demand of cultural industry has great potential, and the rural cultural industry market needs to be further developed. The government has played an important role in the development of cultural industry, some local governments have over-depended on policy, the system of cultural industry can set up the restraint mechanism and incentive mechanism for the development of cultural industry. The system operation and coordinated evolution of each element are efficient and the cultural industry is developing rapidly, but there is still a distance to reach the national pillar industry. Secondly, through the combination of literature analysis method, theoretical analysis method and expert consultation method, the index system of cultural industry efficiency is constructed. Then according to the theory of cultural industry innovation system and literature analysis, this paper selects the efficiency research method as three-stage DEA. Thirdly, using three-stage DEA to analyze the efficiency level of cultural industry in 31 provinces and cities in China. The results show that the cultural industry in the eastern region is developing better, while the cultural industry in the central and western regions is relatively backward, and compared with the eastern region, the development of cultural industry in the eastern region is relatively backward. The development of the cultural industry in the central and western regions is more susceptible to the influence of environmental factors. The GDP and the per capita expenditure of cultural entertainment consumption have a positive effect on the development of the cultural industry. The financial expenditure of culture, sports and media and the expenditure of cultural undertaking expense have a negative effect on the development of cultural industry. At last, the author puts forward some suggestions for the development of cultural industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 戴新民;徐艷斌;;基于DEA的傳播與文化產(chǎn)業(yè)上市公司效率評價[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年06期

2 郭國峰;鄭召鋒;;我國中部六省文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展績效評價與研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年12期

3 白積洋;;中國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資效率的實(shí)證檢驗[J];廣西財經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年05期

4 蔣冬青;;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的制度變遷及其創(chuàng)新[J];重慶社會科學(xué);2013年03期

5 黨勝利;;河北文化產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)的特征[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2011年02期

6 馬萱;鄭世林;;中國區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率研究綜述與展望[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動態(tài);2010年03期

7 梁君;陳顯軍;;我國區(qū)域間文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展差異研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2012年04期

8 王家庭;高珊珊;;我國農(nóng)村文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率評估的實(shí)證研究[J];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年01期

9 常玉苗;;海洋產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)的構(gòu)建及運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2012年07期

10 修國義;劉倩;;我國汽車產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)構(gòu)建研究[J];科技與管理;2011年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 戚汝慶;中國光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：1896731