本文選題：文化競爭力　切入點：時空格局　出處：《河南大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為一種無形財富，文化所具有的競爭力不可忽視，其競爭力大小與區(qū)域的文化資源、文化氛圍、文化發(fā)展水平密切相關。論文依據(jù)文化競爭力的內涵，從文化競爭力的影響因素出發(fā)，將文化競爭力分為基礎能力層、核心能力層和可持續(xù)能力層三個層次，對河南省文化競爭力進行評價。首先，在認真梳理了文化競爭力的概念和內涵的基礎上構建了指標體系。其次，應用因子分析法，計算2011年河南省18個省轄市文化競爭力綜合得分及2005-2011年7年間的河南省18個省轄市文化競爭力的綜合得分，從空間和時間兩個維度把握河南省文化競爭力的空間差異和動態(tài)演進趨勢。最后，從要素層面和不同類型區(qū)域兩個角度提出文化競爭力提升的相應策略。 河南省文化競爭力呈現(xiàn)以下特征： 第一，從空間差異角度看,文化競爭力呈現(xiàn)的特征。 文化競爭力及其三個要素層可分為最強、較強、中等、較弱和最弱五類，其空間分布具有各自的特征�；A能力層空間分布特征：文化競爭力基礎能力層較強的城市呈現(xiàn)“C”型半圓狀；鄭州是其核心；較弱水平城市居多，基本位于“C”的中部。核心能力層空間分布特征：較強的城市以鄭州是其核心，成東西向“一”字型；中等水平的城市居多，主要分布在河南省東部。可持續(xù)能力層空間分布特征：鄭州和洛陽是可持續(xù)能力水平最高的板塊。以其為中心，呈環(huán)狀分布，并逐漸向外降低。從總體上看，可持續(xù)能力水平較高的城市占據(jù)半壁江山，東南部可持續(xù)能力水平較低。文化競爭力的空間分布特征：在18個省轄市中，文化競爭力的相對水平總體處于中等偏下；文化競爭力水平較高的城市基本上呈東北—西南帶狀分布，漯河始終是幾何中心的塌陷區(qū)。 第二，從時間序列角度看，文化競爭力呈現(xiàn)的特征。 河南省18個省轄市的文化競爭力總體趨勢較穩(wěn)定，，且大部分在平均水平之下波動，可見18個省轄市的文化競爭力總體差距不大，但個別城市文化競爭力水平較高。鄭州、洛陽、南陽排名前三甲，鄭州處于遙遙領先地位，但三者的總體趨勢較平穩(wěn)，2011年三者都有下降的趨勢，鄭州表現(xiàn)最明顯，其中2007年洛陽和南陽下降至最低點。信陽波動不大，處于平均水平之下，總體呈現(xiàn)走低的趨勢。新鄉(xiāng)總體呈走低趨勢，但在2011年又較迅速上升。濟源在2007年前上升速度迅速，在2007年達到頂峰，之后呈現(xiàn)下降趨勢，2011年降至最低，在18個省轄市中排名最后。
[Abstract]:As an intangible wealth, the competitiveness of culture can not be ignored, its competitiveness is closely related to the regional cultural resources, cultural atmosphere, cultural development level.Based on the connotation of cultural competitiveness and the influencing factors of cultural competitiveness, the paper divides the cultural competitiveness into three levels: basic competence, core competence and sustainable competence, and evaluates the cultural competitiveness of Henan Province.Firstly, the index system is constructed on the basis of combing the concept and connotation of cultural competitiveness.Secondly, the comprehensive score of cultural competitiveness of 18 provinces and municipalities in Henan Province in 2011 and the comprehensive score of cultural competitiveness of 18 provinces and municipalities in Henan Province from 2005 to 2011 were calculated by using factor analysis method.To grasp the spatial difference and dynamic evolution trend of Henan's cultural competitiveness from two dimensions of space and time.Finally, from the aspect of elements and different types of regions, the corresponding strategies to promote cultural competitiveness are put forward.Henan's cultural competitiveness presents the following characteristics:First, from the perspective of spatial differences, cultural competitiveness presents characteristics.The cultural competitiveness and its three essential elements can be divided into five types: strongest, stronger, moderate, weaker and weakest, and their spatial distribution has their own characteristics.The spatial distribution characteristics of the basic competence layer are as follows: the cities with strong basic competence level of cultural competitiveness present "C" type semicircular shape, Zhengzhou is the core, and the weaker level cities are mostly located in the middle of "C".The characteristics of spatial distribution of core competence layer are as follows: Zhengzhou is the core of the core of the core of the city, and the middle level city is mainly located in the eastern part of Henan Province.The spatial distribution characteristics of sustainability layer: Zhengzhou and Luoyang are the plates with the highest level of sustainability.At its center, it was distributed in a circular pattern and gradually decreased outwards.On the whole, the cities with higher sustainability level occupy half of the mountains, while the southeastern cities occupy a lower level of sustainability.The spatial distribution characteristics of cultural competitiveness: in 18 provinces and municipalities, the relative level of cultural competitiveness is generally below the middle level, and the cities with higher level of cultural competitiveness are basically distributed in the northeast and southwest,Luohe is always the collapse area of geometric center.Second, from the point of view of time series, the characteristics of cultural competitiveness.The overall trend of cultural competitiveness of 18 provinces and municipalities in Henan Province is relatively stable, and most of them fluctuate under the average level. It can be seen that the overall cultural competitiveness of 18 provinces and municipalities is not far from that of other cities, but the level of cultural competitiveness of individual cities is relatively high.Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Nanyang ranked the top three, Zhengzhou is in the leading position, but the overall trend of the three is relatively stable, 2011 all have a downward trend, Zhengzhou is the most obvious, in 2007 Luoyang and Nanyang fell to the lowest point.Xinyang fluctuates little, is below the average level, overall presents the downward trend.Xinxiang overall showed a downward trend, but in 2011 more rapid rise.Jiyuan rose rapidly before 2007, peaked in 2007, then showed a downward trend, reaching its lowest level in 2011, ranking last among 18 municipalities.
【學位授予單位】：河南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G124

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 花建;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力的內涵、結構和戰(zhàn)略重點[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年02期

2 陳劍峰;;長三角地區(qū)城市文化競爭力淺探[J];上海城市管理職業(yè)技術學院學報;2006年03期

3 薛晴;鄭靈燕;霍有光;;關于城市文化競爭力的研究——基于省際交界區(qū)域中心城市的視角[J];城市問題;2010年06期

4 樊綱;論競爭力——關于科技進步與經(jīng)濟效益關系的思考[J];管理世界;1998年03期

5 鄒繼業(yè);;提高我國文化競爭力 鑄造中華文化新輝煌[J];廣西社會主義學院學報;2005年04期

6 邵文革;;略論合肥市城市文化競爭力[J];合肥工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2008年03期

7 雷鳴;吳斯維;王曉;;城市文化競爭力測評體系及其應用研究[J];華南理工大學學報(社會科學版);2009年06期

8 戴鈺;康燦華;;長株潭“兩型社會”建設中文化競爭力的提升[J];湖湘論壇;2009年03期

9 成曉軍;;惠州城市文化競爭力問題的幾點思考[J];惠州學院學報(社會科學版);2006年01期

10 郝壽義,倪鵬飛;中國城市競爭力研究——以若干城市為案例[J];經(jīng)濟科學;1998年03期

本文編號：1707108