日韓文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展模式比較研究(1995~2005)
本文選題:日韓 切入點(diǎn):文化產(chǎn)業(yè) 出處:《北京印刷學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:自20世紀(jì)90年代以來,文化產(chǎn)業(yè)這個(gè)被譽(yù)為后工業(yè)社會的黃金產(chǎn)業(yè),已成為全球發(fā)展最快的產(chǎn)業(yè)之一。世界各國都在增強(qiáng)文化自信的過程中,不斷提高文化創(chuàng)新與文化發(fā)展的自覺性。日韓作為東方文化的典型代表,其文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展模式在1995——2005年間已基本成熟,其中很多經(jīng)驗(yàn)值得我們學(xué)習(xí)借鑒,特別是其運(yùn)用政府主導(dǎo)模式大力發(fā)展文化產(chǎn)業(yè),將科技與文化藝術(shù)融為一體,東西方文化相結(jié)合,實(shí)現(xiàn)文化軟實(shí)力與經(jīng)濟(jì)硬實(shí)力的協(xié)調(diào)統(tǒng)一。在短時(shí)間內(nèi)迅猛發(fā)展,并成功躋身世界文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展強(qiáng)國之列,引起許多國家和地區(qū)的高度關(guān)注。 日本是亞洲文化產(chǎn)業(yè)最發(fā)達(dá)的國家,韓國是亞洲文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的后起之秀。作為儒家文化圈的重要代表國家,其產(chǎn)業(yè)模式的成功運(yùn)用在文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展繁榮中發(fā)揮著極為重要的作用,不僅明確了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展方向,也較好地促進(jìn)了文化資源的合理開發(fā)和有效利用,更是文化產(chǎn)業(yè)健康、快速、可持續(xù)發(fā)展的重要保證。相比日韓等文化產(chǎn)業(yè)強(qiáng)國,中國的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)整體上仍處于發(fā)展初期,迫切需要加強(qiáng)對文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的規(guī)劃和指導(dǎo),促進(jìn)其發(fā)展繁榮。 基于此,本文將圍繞日韓文化產(chǎn)業(yè)及其發(fā)展模式的有關(guān)問題,運(yùn)用經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論,,從研究日韓文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r(1995年~2005年)入手,把握文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策、法律制度、投融資、人才培養(yǎng)激勵(lì)機(jī)制、文化行業(yè)組織及國際化戰(zhàn)略等問題,分析借鑒日韓兩國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗(yàn),為我國的文化建設(shè)與發(fā)展提供一些有益借鑒。
[Abstract]:Since 1990s, the cultural industry is known as the gold industry in the post industrial society, has become one of the fastest growing industries. Every country in the world to enhance cultural self-confidence in the process, constantly improve the consciousness of cultural innovation and cultural development. A typical representative of Japan and South Korea as the oriental culture, the cultural industry development model 1995 - 2005 years has been basically mature, many of which experience is worth learning, especially the use of government dominant mode to develop the cultural industry, science and technology and culture art, western culture combined with the unity of cultural soft power and hard power. The rapid development of the economy in a short period of time, and success among the development the power of cultural industry in the world, caused great concern in many countries and regions.
Japan is the most developed countries in the Asian culture industry, South Korea is the Asian cultural industry. The bright younger generation as an important representative of the Confucian cultural circle of the country, the industry model is successfully used in the development and prosperity of culture industry plays a very important role, not only a clear direction of development of the cultural industry, but also promote the rational development the cultural resources and effective utilization of the cultural industry is healthy, rapid, an important guarantee for sustainable development. Compared with Japan and South Korea and other cultural industry, China cultural industry on the whole is still in the early stages of development, the urgent need to strengthen the culture industry planning and guidance, promote its development and prosperity.
Based on this, the relevant issues around South Korea culture industry and its development mode, using economics theory, from the development of the cultural industry in Japan and South Korea (1995 ~ 2005) start, grasp the cultural industry policy, legal system, financing, personnel training and incentive mechanisms, cultural industry organizations and international strategic issues such as analysis, learn from Japan and South Korea the cultural industry development experience, to provide some useful reference for the construction and development of Chinese culture.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京印刷學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:G13-F
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙乾海;;重振動(dòng)漫產(chǎn)業(yè)[J];出版廣角;2005年01期
2 華民;;What Competition Model for Economic Development Should China Adopt at the Present Stage?[J];China Economist;2008年03期
3 甘旭峰;一諾;;日本文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)對我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)振興規(guī)劃實(shí)施的啟示[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2010年06期
4 包東智;增值業(yè)務(wù)又一閃光點(diǎn)——網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲[J];當(dāng)代通信;2003年17期
5 馬安偉;楊國權(quán);于彩虹;張喜梅;;日本研究生創(chuàng)新型人才培養(yǎng)模式探索[J];中國冶金教育;2006年05期
6 鄭永年;;China,an emerging power,is exploring its own development model[J];China Economist;2010年01期
7 傅宏波;;美日韓的動(dòng)漫文化[J];觀察與思考;2005年11期
8 ;For Peace and Friendship。璆et-together with the Japanese Okinawa Delegation for Cultural Exchanges in Beijing[J];International Understanding;1994年03期
9 崔大滬;中日韓區(qū)域內(nèi)的經(jīng)濟(jì)合作[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年11期
10 董為民;國外文化產(chǎn)業(yè)現(xiàn)狀、發(fā)展措施與經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2004年10期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 初曉;[N];中國信息報(bào);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 榮蓉;日本的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展及運(yùn)作對中國之啟示[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年
本文編號:1593712
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/whjj/1593712.html