【摘要】：中國是一個公共資源大國。公共資源出讓收益分配長期以收益分享為主導(dǎo)，結(jié)果導(dǎo)致了公共資源出讓收益分配中長期存在收益分享比例過高、留存比例過大、共享比例過小的不合理狀況。中共十八大和十八屆三中全會均明確強調(diào)推進公共資源出讓收益分配改革，實現(xiàn)公共資源出讓收益分配合理化。因而，公共資源出讓收益分配改革成為目前我國收入分配改革的一項重要任務(wù)。本文的選題和研究所基于的正是這一背景。 論文首先深刻闡述公共資源的本質(zhì)屬性、類型劃分及邊界動態(tài)性，揭示管制放松背景下公共資源權(quán)利多元化出讓的趨勢，并且探討公共資源出讓收益分配的特殊性及其所應(yīng)遵循的原則。 論文通過對現(xiàn)有各種分配方式及分配機制的配對篩選，從理論上構(gòu)建“按需求共享與按貢獻分享并存”的公共資源出讓收益二元分配模式。并且，論文運用數(shù)理方法，構(gòu)建了激勵相容的公共資源出讓收益分享模型和公共資源出讓收益最優(yōu)留存模型，，推導(dǎo)出了公共資源出讓收益的合理共享比例，使得“按需求共享與按貢獻分享并存”二元分配模式科學(xué)化。此外，論文還以中央國有企業(yè)上繳紅利為例，利用面板向量自回歸模型進行實證檢驗，進一步證明公共資源出讓收益二元分配模式的合理性和有效性。 論文認為，公共資源不同權(quán)利出讓收益的分配格局以及在分配中需要考慮因素是有所不同的。為此，公共資源臨時權(quán)利出讓收益要同時注重功能性分配和規(guī)模性分配；公共資源長期權(quán)利出讓收益只需注重規(guī)模性分配；公共資源永久權(quán)利出讓收益在不考慮下次公共資源永久權(quán)利出讓之下，只需注重規(guī)模性分配；公共資源部分永久權(quán)利出讓收益分配，因其已經(jīng)由原來純公共資源轉(zhuǎn)化為準(zhǔn)公共資源，故只能注重功能性分配�；诖�，論文還在公共資源出讓收益二元分配模式框架下，設(shè)計出公共資源臨時權(quán)利出讓收益、公共資源長期權(quán)利出讓收益、公共資源永久權(quán)利出讓收益、公共資源部分永久權(quán)利出讓收益的二元分配機制，使得公共資源不同權(quán)利出讓收益分配更加合理化。 最后，論文還探討了改革現(xiàn)行公共資源出讓收益分配體制，由現(xiàn)行以分享為主導(dǎo)的分配模式走向以共享為主導(dǎo)的分配模式的思路與路徑。
[Abstract]:China is a big public resource country. The distribution of public resources transfer income is dominated by income sharing for a long time, which results in the unreasonable situation that the proportion of income sharing is too high, the proportion of retained income is too large, and the proportion of sharing is too small for a long time. Both the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and the third Plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China explicitly emphasized the reform of the allocation of public resources to realize the rationalization of the distribution of public resources. Therefore, the reform of income distribution of public resources has become an important task of the reform of income distribution in China. This thesis is based on this background. First of all, this paper deeply expounds the essential attribute, type division and boundary dynamics of public resources, and reveals the trend of pluralistic transfer of public resources rights under the background of deregulation. It also discusses the particularity of the distribution of public resources and the principles that should be followed. In this paper, we construct a dual distribution model of public resource allocation income based on demand-sharing and contribution-sharing by pairing and screening the existing distribution modes and mechanisms of public resources from the point of view of "sharing according to demand and sharing according to contribution". In addition, using mathematical method, the paper constructs incentive compatible public resource allocation revenue sharing model and public resource transfer revenue optimal retention model, and deduces the reasonable share ratio of public resource transfer income. Make "share according to demand and share according to contribution" dual distribution pattern scientific. In addition, taking the dividend paid by the central state-owned enterprises as an example, the paper uses the panel vector autoregressive model to carry on the empirical test, which further proves the rationality and effectiveness of the dual distribution model of the public resources transfer income. The paper holds that the distribution pattern and the factors that need to be taken into account in the distribution of the income from the transfer of the rights of public resources are different. Therefore, the transfer proceeds of temporary rights of public resources should be paid attention to both functional distribution and scale allocation, and the long-term rights of public resources should only pay attention to the distribution of scale, while the distribution of temporary rights of public resources should be paid more attention to. The proceeds of the permanent right transfer of public resources should only pay attention to the allocation of rules without considering the next transfer of the permanent rights of public resources; Some permanent rights of public resources are allocated, because they have been transformed from pure public resources to preemptive public resources, so they can only pay attention to functional distribution. Based on this, the paper also designs the public resources temporary right transfer income, the public resources long-term right assignment income, the public resources permanent right assignment income under the framework of the dual distribution pattern of the public resources transfer income. The dual distribution mechanism of partial permanent rights of public resources makes the distribution of income of different rights of public resources more reasonable. Finally, the paper also discusses the reform of the current public resources transfer income distribution system, from the current sharing-led distribution model to the sharing-led distribution mode and the way of thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F124.7

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李明月,胡竹枝;分權(quán)體制下的中央政府土地收益分享安排[J];財經(jīng)論叢(浙江財經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報);2005年02期

2 劉小玲;我國土地市場化過程中的三方博弈分析[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2005年11期

3 白彥鋒;;土地出讓金與我國的物業(yè)稅改革[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2007年04期

4 胡洪曙;楊君茹;;財產(chǎn)稅替代土地出讓金的必要性及可行性研究[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2008年09期

5 趙燕菁;莊淑亭;;基于稅收制度的政府行為解釋[J];城市規(guī)劃;2008年04期

6 李心合;面向可持續(xù)發(fā)展的利益相關(guān)者管理[J];當(dāng)代財經(jīng);2001年01期

7 樊麗明;李華;郭健;;城鎮(zhèn)化進程中的房地產(chǎn)稅制改革研究[J];當(dāng)代財經(jīng);2006年07期

8 劉先江;;論當(dāng)前我國利益共享的機制障礙及其調(diào)適[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會主義;2011年06期

9 張少華,方勇,李渝曾;一種激勵相容的發(fā)電市場競價機制[J];電力系統(tǒng)自動化;2003年07期

10 王小映;賀明玉;高永;;我國農(nóng)地轉(zhuǎn)用中的土地收益分配實證研究——基于昆山、桐城、新都三地的抽樣調(diào)查分析[J];管理世界;2006年05期

本文編號：2438990