【摘要】：長(zhǎng)江經(jīng)濟(jì)帶跨越我國(guó)東中西三大區(qū)域,是推進(jìn)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的重要載體。2016年《長(zhǎng)江經(jīng)濟(jì)帶發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要》的發(fā)布標(biāo)志著以城市群為核心的城鎮(zhèn)空間格局得到進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化,城市群進(jìn)入加速發(fā)展期。成渝城市群經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)主要依靠投資驅(qū)動(dòng)和要素驅(qū)動(dòng),創(chuàng)新在經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)中的作用不顯著,創(chuàng)新是增強(qiáng)城市群核心帶動(dòng)作用的關(guān)鍵�！冻捎宄鞘腥喊l(fā)展規(guī)劃2016-2020》中指出要把成渝城市群建成西部創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)先導(dǎo)區(qū),提高創(chuàng)新能力以增強(qiáng)核心帶動(dòng)作用,這既是區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展理念的重大突破,也是促進(jìn)長(zhǎng)江經(jīng)濟(jì)帶發(fā)展,縮小區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異,實(shí)現(xiàn)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)選擇。為建成西部創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)先導(dǎo)區(qū),成渝城市群必須提高創(chuàng)新能力,依靠創(chuàng)新帶動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),通過(guò)提高創(chuàng)新能力來(lái)增強(qiáng)核心帶動(dòng)作用。城市群的創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)具有系統(tǒng)性、綜合性和動(dòng)態(tài)性,是多個(gè)創(chuàng)新主體各種創(chuàng)新行為的集合,只有對(duì)成渝城市群當(dāng)下的創(chuàng)新能力有一個(gè)較為透徹的認(rèn)知和評(píng)價(jià),才能充分利用已有創(chuàng)新資源,培育壯大創(chuàng)新能力。因此,評(píng)價(jià)成渝城市群創(chuàng)新能力是提升其創(chuàng)新能力的關(guān)鍵與前提,而提高創(chuàng)新能力是建成西部創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)先導(dǎo)區(qū)的關(guān)鍵著力點(diǎn)。城市群創(chuàng)新是群內(nèi)的創(chuàng)新主體運(yùn)用多種創(chuàng)新資源開(kāi)展創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)從而形成創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出的過(guò)程,不是單個(gè)創(chuàng)新主體創(chuàng)新行為的反映,而是多個(gè)創(chuàng)新主體各種創(chuàng)新行為的綜合體現(xiàn),是動(dòng)態(tài)變化的,包含城市群創(chuàng)新實(shí)力和城市群創(chuàng)新潛力兩個(gè)方面,創(chuàng)新實(shí)力反映當(dāng)下的創(chuàng)新基礎(chǔ),創(chuàng)新潛力反映創(chuàng)新的增長(zhǎng)速度和創(chuàng)新增長(zhǎng)空間。2011年國(guó)務(wù)院批復(fù)《成渝經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)規(guī)劃》,2016年經(jīng)國(guó)務(wù)院同意《成渝城市群規(guī)劃2016-2020》正式頒發(fā),鑒于此,本文選用2011-2015年的數(shù)據(jù),采用定性分析與定量分析相結(jié)合的方法,依據(jù)增長(zhǎng)極理論、創(chuàng)新理論和創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)理論,以中國(guó)科技發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究小組構(gòu)建的區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系為藍(lán)本構(gòu)建評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo),包含知識(shí)創(chuàng)新能力、知識(shí)獲取能力、企業(yè)創(chuàng)新能力、創(chuàng)新支撐能力、創(chuàng)新綜合產(chǎn)出五項(xiàng)子系統(tǒng)。首先,利用熵值法從從整體層面對(duì)成渝城市群的創(chuàng)新實(shí)力和創(chuàng)新潛力進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),把成渝城市群與長(zhǎng)江經(jīng)濟(jì)帶其余兩大城市群,即與成熟型城市群長(zhǎng)三角城市群和發(fā)展型城市群長(zhǎng)中游城市群進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,從整體上把握成渝城市群的創(chuàng)新實(shí)力和創(chuàng)新潛力;其次,對(duì)成渝城市群內(nèi)部區(qū)域的創(chuàng)新實(shí)力和創(chuàng)新潛力進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),成渝城市群由26個(gè)成員城市構(gòu)成,這些城市是區(qū)域性中心城市或戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集群區(qū),其創(chuàng)新能力的提升對(duì)于整個(gè)城市群經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展意義重大,整體評(píng)價(jià)與內(nèi)部評(píng)價(jià)相結(jié)合可以對(duì)成渝城市群的創(chuàng)新能力有一個(gè)更具體的認(rèn)知;最后,對(duì)成渝城市群各成員城市的創(chuàng)新實(shí)力和創(chuàng)新潛力綜合評(píng)價(jià)值進(jìn)行聚類分析,從中總結(jié)成渝城市群創(chuàng)新能力的發(fā)展規(guī)律,并依據(jù)實(shí)證分析結(jié)果,提出政策建議。經(jīng)過(guò)研究,結(jié)論有:(1)成渝城市群現(xiàn)階段的創(chuàng)新實(shí)力遠(yuǎn)低于長(zhǎng)三角游城市群,且兩者差距有擴(kuò)大趨勢(shì),但成渝城市群擁有較高的創(chuàng)新增長(zhǎng)速度和較大的創(chuàng)新增長(zhǎng)潛力,創(chuàng)新增長(zhǎng)空間較大;成都市各項(xiàng)子系統(tǒng)的創(chuàng)新實(shí)力值最高,但其創(chuàng)新潛力不如內(nèi)江市、遂寧市等。(2)成渝城市群企業(yè)創(chuàng)新實(shí)力較低,企業(yè)在創(chuàng)新中的作用不突出。從整體評(píng)價(jià)來(lái)看,成渝城市群的企業(yè)創(chuàng)新實(shí)力遠(yuǎn)低于長(zhǎng)三角城市群,也低于長(zhǎng)中游城市群;從內(nèi)部區(qū)域評(píng)價(jià)來(lái)看,各區(qū)(市)的企業(yè)創(chuàng)新實(shí)力不高,企業(yè)創(chuàng)新的增速度和增長(zhǎng)潛力也不突出。企業(yè)在創(chuàng)新中的主體作用尚未得到充分發(fā)揮,但企業(yè)創(chuàng)新在城市群創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)中的作用較大,企業(yè)創(chuàng)新能力偏低直接決定了現(xiàn)階段成渝城市群的創(chuàng)新能力不高。(3)成渝城市群的知識(shí)創(chuàng)新實(shí)力、知識(shí)獲取實(shí)力、創(chuàng)新支撐實(shí)力和創(chuàng)新綜合產(chǎn)出實(shí)力僅次于長(zhǎng)三角城市群,但差距較大,而與長(zhǎng)中游城市群相比差距不大,兩者同處城市群發(fā)展階段,現(xiàn)階段的創(chuàng)新基礎(chǔ)和創(chuàng)新水平比較接近;成渝城市群擁有最高的知識(shí)創(chuàng)新潛力和創(chuàng)新綜合產(chǎn)出潛力,其知識(shí)獲取潛力、創(chuàng)新支撐潛力僅次于長(zhǎng)中游城市群,位居第二,這些表明成渝城市群已具備了一定的創(chuàng)新基礎(chǔ),但仍有許多改進(jìn)空間。(4)成渝城市群各成員城市的創(chuàng)新潛力相差不大,創(chuàng)新增長(zhǎng)空間巨大。高創(chuàng)新實(shí)力和高創(chuàng)新潛力的區(qū)(市)較少,成都市、綿陽(yáng)市、渝北區(qū)屬于創(chuàng)新實(shí)力較高的一二類區(qū)域,內(nèi)江市、遂寧市屬于創(chuàng)新潛力較高的一二類區(qū)域。從創(chuàng)新潛力的聚類結(jié)果來(lái)看,大部分區(qū)(市)都屬于三四類區(qū)域,共有內(nèi)江市、遂寧市、江北區(qū)、沙坪壩區(qū)、永川區(qū)、巴南區(qū)等23個(gè)區(qū)(市),這兩類城市的聚類中心分別為1.23和1.22,差距非常小,因此各區(qū)(市)的創(chuàng)新潛力相差不大,成員城市具有較大的創(chuàng)新增長(zhǎng)空間。據(jù)研究結(jié)論,本文從鼓勵(lì)區(qū)域性中心城市的企業(yè)創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)、加強(qiáng)高創(chuàng)新潛力區(qū)域的人才培育力度、鼓勵(lì)內(nèi)部區(qū)域之間開(kāi)展創(chuàng)新交流活動(dòng)、提升創(chuàng)新支撐能力、鼓勵(lì)發(fā)明創(chuàng)造等方面提出政策建議,以期為提高成渝城市群創(chuàng)新能力提供現(xiàn)實(shí)參考。
[Abstract]:The Yangtze River Economic Belt, which spans three major regions of China, is an important carrier to promote the coordinated development of regional economy. The publication of the Outline of Development Planning for the Yangtze River Economic Belt in 2016 marked the further optimization of the urban spatial pattern with the urban agglomeration as the core and the acceleration of the urban agglomeration. Innovation is the key to enhancing the core driving role of urban agglomeration. points out that Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration should be built into the western innovation driving pilot area, and the innovation ability should be improved to enhance the core driving role, which is the concept of regional economic development. The major breakthrough is also a realistic choice to promote the development of the Yangtze River economic belt, narrow the regional economic differences and realize the coordinated development of regional economy. Activities are systematic, comprehensive and dynamic, and are the aggregation of various innovative behaviors of multiple innovative subjects. Only with a thorough understanding and evaluation of the innovative ability of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, can we make full use of the existing innovative resources and cultivate and strengthen the innovative ability. Therefore, evaluating the innovative ability of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration is to enhance its innovative ability. The innovation of urban agglomeration is a process in which the innovative subjects in the agglomeration use a variety of innovative resources to carry out innovative activities and thus form innovative output. It is not a reflection of the innovative behavior of individual innovative subjects, but a reflection of various innovative behaviors of multiple innovative subjects. The comprehensive manifestation of the behavior is dynamic change, including the innovation strength of urban agglomerations and the innovation potential of urban agglomerations. The innovation strength reflects the current innovation foundation, and the innovation potential reflects the innovation growth speed and innovation growth space. In view of this, this paper chooses the data from 2011 to 2015, combines qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis, based on the growth pole theory, innovation theory and innovation system theory, and takes the evaluation index system of regional innovation capability constructed by China Science and Technology Development Strategy Research Group as the blueprint to construct the evaluation index system, which contains knowledge. Firstly, the paper evaluates the innovation strength and innovation potential of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration from the whole level by using entropy method, and makes a comparison between the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration and the other two major urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, namely, the Yangtze River Delta City with the mature urban agglomeration. This paper makes a comparative analysis between the urban agglomeration and the development-oriented urban agglomeration in the middle and long reaches of the city, and grasps the innovative strength and potential of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration as a whole. Secondly, it evaluates the innovative strength and potential of the inner region of the urban agglomeration. The Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration consists of 26 member cities, which are regional central cities or strategic cities. The promotion of the innovation capability of the new industrial clusters is of great significance to the economic development of the whole urban agglomeration. The combination of the overall evaluation and the internal evaluation can have a more specific understanding of the innovation capability of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration. Finally, the comprehensive evaluation value of the innovation capability and innovation potential of the member cities of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration is clustered. This paper summarizes the development law of innovation ability of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, and puts forward some policy suggestions based on the results of empirical analysis. Chengdu has the highest value of innovation strength, but its innovation potential is not as good as Neijiang and Suining. (2) Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration has a lower innovation strength and its role in innovation is not prominent. The main role of enterprises in innovation has not been fully played, but the role of enterprise innovation in the evaluation of innovation capability of urban agglomerations is greater, and the innovation capability of enterprises is on the low side. The innovation ability of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration is not high at present. (3) The knowledge innovation strength, knowledge acquisition strength, innovation support strength and innovation comprehensive output strength of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration are only inferior to those of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, but the gap is bigger, and the gap is not big compared with the urban agglomeration of the middle and long reaches. Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration has the highest potential of knowledge innovation and comprehensive output of innovation, and its potential of knowledge acquisition and innovation support is second only to the long and middle reaches of urban agglomeration, which shows that Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration has a certain innovation foundation, but there is still much room for improvement. The innovation potential of each member city of the city group is not much different, and the innovation growth space is huge. There are fewer regions (cities) with high innovation strength and high innovation potential. Chengdu, Mianyang and Yubei are the first and second regions with high innovation strength. Neijiang and Suining are the first and second regions with high innovation potential. Some districts (cities) belong to three or four types of regions, including Neijiang City, Suining City, Jiangbei District, Shapingba District, Yongchuan District and Banan District. The cluster centers of these two types of cities are 1.23 and 1.22, respectively. The gap is very small, so the innovation potential of each district (city) is not very different, and the member cities have great innovation growth space. This paper puts forward some policy suggestions from the aspects of encouraging the innovation activities of enterprises in regional central cities, strengthening the cultivation of talents in regions with high innovation potential, encouraging innovation exchanges among internal regions, enhancing the supporting capacity of innovation and encouraging invention and creation, in order to provide practical reference for improving the innovation ability of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李存斌;魯平;;基于云模型的電力企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];科技管理研究;2017年02期

2 趙艷華;趙士雯;;基于灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度的京津冀區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力影響因素比較分析[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年01期

3 徐永智;衣保中;;中國(guó)東部各省市區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)[J];黑龍江社會(huì)科學(xué);2017年01期

4 蔣振威;王平;;海南區(qū)域技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)與空間差異性分析——基于2009—2014年海南18個(gè)市縣面板數(shù)據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2016年11期

5 劉瑋;李逸飛;李靜;;“十三五”時(shí)期中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題的研究動(dòng)態(tài)[J];區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2016年04期

6 張永恒;郝壽義;;從區(qū)位論的演化看區(qū)域的本質(zhì)[J];區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2016年04期

7 蔡繼明;張圣君;;論國(guó)家四大區(qū)域發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的耦合[J];區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2016年04期

8 趙炎;徐悅蕾;;上海市區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)[J];科研管理;2016年S1期

9 李濤;孫研;;我國(guó)西部區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力影響因素的空間計(jì)量分析——基于西部地區(qū)面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年01期

10 趙文平;徐勁松;;絲綢之路經(jīng)濟(jì)帶區(qū)域創(chuàng)新效率評(píng)價(jià)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2015年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 呂國(guó)輝;長(zhǎng)江三角洲區(qū)域創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

2 王鵬;新經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)理論與臺(tái)灣經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 薛源;成渝城市群產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演進(jìn)與城鎮(zhèn)化協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展研究[D];西南大學(xué);2016年

2 石婷;四川省區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建與實(shí)例分析[D];成都理工大學(xué);2012年

3 甘蓉蓉;湖南省區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

4 姜小冉;區(qū)域技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系及評(píng)價(jià)模型研究[D];山東科技大學(xué);2010年

5 王彥博;區(qū)域性產(chǎn)業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建與實(shí)例分析[D];天津大學(xué);2012年

6 李小鋒;陜西省區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];西安科技大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2243901

suoshi