俄羅斯產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變分析
[Abstract]:Industrial structure and economic growth interact and interact. A good industrial structure will inevitably promote the sustained and healthy development of the economy. The study of the situation of industrial structure in different periods and the economic policies implemented by the government in view of this industrial structure situation will help to deepen the analysis of the main factors affecting the industrial structure of Russia, so as to formulate correct economic policies. Realizing the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure lays a foundation for the adjustment of industrial structure in China. This paper analyzes the different economic policies adopted by different governments in different periods and their influence on the industrial structure. The main reasons are as follows: the former Soviet Union government adopted the economic policy of militarization of the national economy because of its erroneous estimation of the international situation. Heavy light industry caused serious imbalance of the industrial situation, and lead to economic development difficulties. In the face of these economic problems, the Yeltsin government adopted "shock therapy", rapidly shifting from a planned economy to a market economy, adopting an economic policy of accelerating the privatization of the national economy and fully opening up to the outside world. But the transition was largely unsuccessful, not only to alleviate the imbalance in heavy and light industry, but also to reduce high inflation and output. Putin's government pays attention to protecting the private economy while increasing the state's support for key industries and key fields, and actively creates a good environment for the development of the market economy. While Putin's period was still dominated by heavy industry and the trend towards energy and raw-material exports has not changed, the economy has been growing at a high rate, and poverty and unemployment levels have fallen. The Mayp era suffered from the global economic crisis, the economic growth rate fell, but high inflation rate also fell significantly. The government put forward "the development mode of social innovation" to replace the traditional energy type and modernization plan, attach importance to the role of science and technology in the adjustment of industrial structure, and use advanced technology to reform the traditional industry. Although the development direction of the Meip period is correct, its industrial structure and export structure energy, which is dominated by heavy industry, has not been improved. After introducing different economic policies in different stages of Russian government and their influence on industrial structure, this paper briefly analyzes the main factors affecting Russian industrial structure from the aspects of supply and demand. Based on the analysis of these factors, this paper puts forward the prediction of the main indicators of Russian social and economic development in 2020-2030, which determines that Russia should take an innovative development plan and is supported by data to prove it. Then, according to the influence factors of Russian industrial structure, this paper analyzes the obstacles and challenges of innovative development schemes, including economic system, high inflation rate, efficiency of scientific and technological transformation, population factors and international division of labor. Subsequently, the enlightenment of the Russian industrial structure to China (such as the industrial structure, the relationship between government enterprises and the market, etc.) was analyzed, although the readjustment of the Russian industrial structure and the development of the economy have found the right direction. However, there must be many obstacles and challenges in the process of development, which can be said to be full of difficulties and need to be explored in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:蘭州交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F151.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 戚文海;;對(duì)梅德韋杰夫時(shí)期俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式的分析與預(yù)測(cè)[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐市場(chǎng);2008年09期
2 郭連成;;普京時(shí)代俄羅斯轉(zhuǎn)軌經(jīng)濟(jì)論析——兼論后普京時(shí)代俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展走勢(shì)[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2008年05期
3 程偉;殷紅;;俄羅斯產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演變研究[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2009年01期
4 郭曉瓊;;葉利欽時(shí)期俄羅斯產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)研究——以經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型為視角[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2011年04期
5 徐坡嶺;韓爽;;梅普組合下俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與政策趨勢(shì)分析[J];俄羅斯研究;2008年03期
6 關(guān)雪凌;宮艷華;;俄羅斯產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的調(diào)整、問題與影響[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期
7 郭連成;楊宏;王鑫;;全球產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動(dòng)與俄羅斯產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整和產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2012年06期
8 郭曉瓊;;“梅普”時(shí)期的俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì):形勢(shì)、政策、成就及問題[J];東北亞論壇;2012年06期
9 肖輝忠;;“俄羅斯的發(fā)展前景:新階段、新機(jī)遇、新挑戰(zhàn)”——2008年全國(guó)俄羅斯形勢(shì)例行研討會(huì)綜述[J];俄羅斯研究;2008年04期
10 高萌;;前蘇聯(lián)演變的經(jīng)濟(jì)根源[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年19期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 高云輝;普京時(shí)期的俄羅斯經(jīng)濟(jì)振興與經(jīng)濟(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年
本文編號(hào):2141600
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2141600.html