本文選題：發(fā)展型國(guó)家 + 全球化��； 參考：《經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較》2017年02期

【摘要】：文章通過(guò)對(duì)既有文獻(xiàn)的梳理與分析,歸納出解釋發(fā)展型國(guó)家興衰轉(zhuǎn)變的兩大視角:"結(jié)構(gòu)視角"與"機(jī)制視角"。前者從"國(guó)家能力"出發(fā),認(rèn)為國(guó)家能力的削弱是導(dǎo)致發(fā)展型國(guó)家衰落的原因;后者從"產(chǎn)業(yè)政策"入手,認(rèn)為產(chǎn)業(yè)政策在發(fā)展早期有效而后期無(wú)效,這才是問(wèn)題的關(guān)鍵。在此基礎(chǔ)上,文章進(jìn)一步建立了"信息"與"規(guī)模"的框架,完善了上述"機(jī)制視角"。在"機(jī)制視角"的邏輯下,"發(fā)展型國(guó)家"這一政府介入的形式雖然在東亞國(guó)家終結(jié)了,但是對(duì)于廣大仍處于追趕階段的后發(fā)展國(guó)家而言,仍然值得借鑒。
[Abstract]:By combing and analyzing the existing literature, this paper sums up two major perspectives to explain the rise and fall of developing countries: "structural perspective" and "mechanism perspective". The former starts from the "national capacity", thinks that the weakening of the national capacity is the cause of the decline of the development-oriented state, and the latter starts with the "industrial policy", and thinks that the industrial policy is effective in the early stage of development but ineffective in the later stage, which is the key to the problem. On this basis, the paper further establishes the framework of "information" and "scale", and consummates the "mechanism perspective". Under the logic of "mechanism perspective", "developmental state", a form of government intervention, has ended in East Asian countries, but it is still worthy of reference for the majority of post-developing countries which are still in the catch-up stage.
【作者單位】： 華東理工大學(xué)社會(huì)工作與社會(huì)政策研究院;浙江大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院社會(huì)學(xué)系;
【分類號(hào)】：F112.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 曹海軍;;試論國(guó)家能力建設(shè)的科學(xué)內(nèi)涵[J];內(nèi)蒙古民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年06期

2 霍建國(guó);;后金融危機(jī)時(shí)代的國(guó)家能力建設(shè)探析[J];新視野;2012年02期

3 朱安東;李民騏;韓野;;國(guó)家能力與中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的可持續(xù)性[J];政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年04期

4 韓毓海;;中國(guó)發(fā)展五大戰(zhàn)略基石[J];國(guó)外理論動(dòng)態(tài);2011年12期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 李巍;福山的憂慮[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2104330