本文選題：京津冀 + 高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)結構��； 參考：《北京交通大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)是驅動國家技術創(chuàng)新和經(jīng)濟增長的新極點,發(fā)展高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)對提升國際競爭力、推動經(jīng)濟結構轉型升級,激活經(jīng)濟疲態(tài)具有積極作用。京津冀作為我國在北方地區(qū)培育的經(jīng)濟中心,承擔著成為既長三角、珠三角后,我國高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展第三極的重大使命。合理的高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)結構,對京津冀地區(qū)高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈的分工協(xié)作、創(chuàng)新資源在區(qū)域內(nèi)部的流動及輻射帶動周邊區(qū)域創(chuàng)新發(fā)展與產(chǎn)業(yè)升級都有促進作用,也是推動京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展的重要著力點。因此對高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)結構展開研究,了解其產(chǎn)業(yè)結構現(xiàn)狀,發(fā)現(xiàn)產(chǎn)業(yè)結構中存在的問題,對實現(xiàn)產(chǎn)業(yè)結構優(yōu)化,促進高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展具有重要意義。本文運用1998-2014年高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)相關數(shù)據(jù),首先對京津冀地區(qū)高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展狀況進行梳理并對其產(chǎn)業(yè)的內(nèi)部結構和空間結構進行分析,指出了高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)現(xiàn)存的結構性和制度性問題。然后在對高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)結構合理化的實質和目標研究的基礎上,選取了三個切入點對高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)結構進行評價。一是基于產(chǎn)業(yè)生命周期視角,通過構建Logistic曲線方程,對京津冀地區(qū)高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)各行業(yè)的成長階段進行研究;二是運用區(qū)域分工指數(shù)和地方專業(yè)化指數(shù)對京津冀地區(qū)高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)的空間結構進行了測度,探索京津冀高技術區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)分工布局;三是結合數(shù)據(jù)包絡分析法(DEA)對高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)投入—產(chǎn)出結構進行了分析。最后得出研究結論并就高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)結構存在的問題提出了相應的對策與建議。研究表明:(1)近年來京津冀地區(qū)高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)得到了較大的發(fā)展,形成了以電子及通信設備制造業(yè)為主導產(chǎn)業(yè),醫(yī)藥制造業(yè)快速增長,醫(yī)療設備及儀器儀表設備制造業(yè)和航空航天器制造業(yè)穩(wěn)步上升,計算機及辦公設備制造業(yè)發(fā)展減緩的行業(yè)格局。產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展存在:①結構性問題包括:各行業(yè)發(fā)展水平差距明顯,主導行業(yè)利潤率低;研發(fā)投入要素利用效率不高,產(chǎn)業(yè)化轉換能力不足;高技術企業(yè)研發(fā)能力不足多且處于全球價值鏈和產(chǎn)業(yè)分工低端環(huán)節(jié),貿(mào)易逆差嚴重;京、津、冀三地高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展水平差別明顯,區(qū)域合作協(xié)同不足,高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)模式單一。②制度性問題包括:高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的政策環(huán)境仍需要改善;缺乏具有風險管理經(jīng)驗的高技術企業(yè)家。(2)京津冀地區(qū)電子及通訊設備制造業(yè)處于成熟期,計算機及辦公用品處于成長后期,醫(yī)藥制造業(yè)與醫(yī)療設備及儀器儀表制造業(yè)均處于成長前期,處于不同成長階段的產(chǎn)業(yè)對產(chǎn)業(yè)結構的影響和調(diào)整方向不同。(3)京津冀高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)空間結構不存在嚴重的同構現(xiàn)象,北京市高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)各行業(yè)發(fā)展較為均衡,天津市的電子及通訊設備制造業(yè)、河北省的醫(yī)藥制造業(yè)在地區(qū)具有明顯優(yōu)勢。但區(qū)域內(nèi)部帶有明顯的發(fā)達地區(qū)和欠發(fā)達地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度分工方式,即地區(qū)間產(chǎn)業(yè)雖然存在一定程度的互補性,但依然具有較強的依附性。(4)京津冀高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)總體投入—產(chǎn)出結構不合理,資源配置效率低,各主要投入要素均出現(xiàn)冗余,尤其是創(chuàng)新要素投入利用率偏低,利潤產(chǎn)出不足情況也較為嚴重。從行業(yè)內(nèi)部來看,處于成熟期的電子及通訊設備制造業(yè)和成長后期的計算機及辦公用品制造業(yè)的要素利用率低,產(chǎn)業(yè)步入規(guī)模遞減階段,產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展呈現(xiàn)疲態(tài),利潤產(chǎn)出不足的情況嚴重。處于成長前期的醫(yī)藥制造業(yè)與醫(yī)療設備及儀器儀表制造業(yè)的技術經(jīng)費投入內(nèi)部結構不合理造成的冗余嚴重,因其主要以技術引進和改造作為主要的創(chuàng)新手段,自主創(chuàng)新能力相對較弱,產(chǎn)業(yè)的核心技術對外依存程度依然嚴重,更多是跟隨模仿或移植國外技術并進行國際產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈低端環(huán)節(jié)的產(chǎn)能擴張。從地區(qū)間來看,京津兩市的投入冗余主要集中在RD投入及人力資本投入,而河北省的投入要素冗余則主要存在于固定資產(chǎn)投入,地區(qū)間資源配置不合理,創(chuàng)新要素在區(qū)域間流動不暢。
[Abstract]:High technology industry is the new pole to drive national technological innovation and economic growth. Developing high technology industry has a positive effect on promoting international competitiveness, promoting economic structure transformation and upgrading and activating economic fatigue. As an economic center in the northern region, Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei bear the high technology of China as the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. The important mission of the third pole of industrial development. The rational high-tech industrial structure, the division and cooperation of the high-tech industrial chain in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei region, the flow of innovative resources in the region and the radiation driving the innovation and development of the surrounding region and the industrial upgrading, are also the key points for promoting the coordinated development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. The study of industrial structure, the understanding of the status of its industrial structure and the discovery of the problems in the industrial structure are of great significance to the realization of the optimization of the industrial structure and the promotion of the development of the high-tech industry. In this paper, the development status of the high-tech industries in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is combed and the industry of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is first reviewed with 1998-2014 years of high technology industry related data. The internal structure and the spatial structure are analyzed, and the existing structural and institutional problems of the high-tech industry are pointed out. Then, on the basis of the research on the essence and the target of the rationalization of the high-tech industrial structure, three entry points are selected to evaluate the high-tech industrial structure. One is based on the industrial life cycle perspective, through the construction of Logist IC curve equation, the growth stage of high-tech industries in Beijing Tianjin Hebei region is studied. Two is to use regional division of labor index and local specialization index to measure the spatial structure of high-tech industries in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei region, explore the regional industrial division of industry in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province, and the three is the combination of data envelopment analysis (DEA) for high technology. The investment output structure of the operation industry is analyzed. Finally, the conclusions are drawn and the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward on the problems of the high-tech industrial structure. (1) the high technology industry in Beijing Tianjin Hebei region has been greatly developed in recent years, and the manufacturing industry of electronic and communication equipment is the leading industry, and the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry has been formed. Rapid growth, medical equipment and instrumentation equipment manufacturing industry and aviation and spacecraft manufacturing industry steadily rising, computer and office equipment manufacturing industry development slowed down industry pattern. Industrial development exists: 1 structural problems include: the development level gap of various industries is obvious, leading industry profit rate is low; research and development input factor utilization efficiency is not high, production The ability of industrialization conversion is insufficient; the R & D ability of high-tech enterprises is insufficient and is in the global value chain and the low end of industrial division of labor, the trade deficit is serious; the development level of high-tech industries in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei three areas is distinct, the regional cooperation and cooperation are insufficient and the high-tech industrial park mode is single. The policy environment still needs to be improved, and the high-tech entrepreneurs with risk management experience are lack. (2) the manufacturing industry of electronic and communication equipment in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is in the mature period, and the computer and office supplies are in the late growth period. The pharmaceutical manufacturing industry and medical equipment and instrument manufacturing industry are in the early stage of growth and are at different stages of growth. The influence and adjustment direction of the industrial structure are different. (3) there is no serious isomorphism in the space structure of high technology industry in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Province. The development of Beijing high-tech industries is more balanced, the electronic and communication equipment manufacturing industry in Tianjin, and the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry in Hebei Province has obvious advantages. The industrial gradient division mode in regional and underdeveloped areas, that is, although there is a certain degree of complementarity in the inter regional industry, but still has strong dependence. (4) the overall input and output structure of the high-tech industry in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is not reasonable, the efficiency of the resource allocation is low, and the main input factors are redundant, especially the input and utilization of the innovative elements. In the industry, the factor utilization rate of computer and office supplies in the mature period of electronic and communication equipment manufacturing industry and the later growth period is low, and the industry has entered the stage of decline in scale, the industrial development is exhausted and the profit output is insufficient. The internal structure of medical equipment and medical equipment and instrument manufacturing industry is seriously redundant. Because it mainly takes technology introduction and transformation as the main innovation means, the ability of independent innovation is relatively weak, the core technology of industry is still serious, and more is following imitation or migration. From the regional point of view, the investment redundancy of two cities in Beijing and Tianjin is mainly concentrated on RD input and human capital input, while the redundancy of input elements in Hebei mainly exists in fixed assets investment, the allocation of resources between regions is unreasonable, and the flow of innovation elements is not smooth between regions.
【學位授予單位】：北京交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F127

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐永利;;國際競爭力視域下京津冀區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)分工研究[J];河北學刊;2016年05期

2 張杰斐;席強敏;李國平;;中國高技術制造業(yè)空間分工結構的特征及效應[J];山西大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2016年04期

3 劉浩;馬琳;李國平;;1990s以來京津冀地區(qū)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展失衡格局的時空演化[J];地理研究;2016年03期

4 吳愛芝;李國平;張杰斐;;京津冀地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)分工合作機理與模式研究[J];人口與發(fā)展;2015年06期

5 彭媛;徐長樂;;長三角地區(qū)高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展狀況研究——基于江、浙、滬的比較研究[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2015年08期

6 魯金萍;劉玉;楊振武;孫久文;;京津冀區(qū)域制造業(yè)同構現(xiàn)象再判斷——基于分工視角的研究[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2015年07期

7 馮玫;裴小丹;儲兆鈺;;京津冀高新技術產(chǎn)業(yè)協(xié)同發(fā)展路徑研究——基于產(chǎn)業(yè)生命周期的視角[J];統(tǒng)計與管理;2015年06期

8 黃杰琪;文宗川;;基于S曲線的我國風電產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展階段研究[J];資源開發(fā)與市場;2015年04期

9 劉川;;三維視角下高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)升級能力與升級策略研究——基于省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];經(jīng)濟問題探索;2014年08期

10 周燕萍;徐長樂;秦可德;;基于DEA的上海高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)結構優(yōu)化研究[J];科技管理研究;2014年04期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 劉春濟;我國旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)結構優(yōu)化研究[D];華東師范大學;2014年

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 張文慧;環(huán)渤海地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)分工與合作研究[D];山東師范大學;2013年

2 李龍;遼寧省旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)結構優(yōu)化研究[D];沈陽師范大學;2013年

3 楊笑嫣;吉林省農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)結構評價[D];吉林大學;2011年

4 劉，

本文編號：2088414